Simply download Ollama and run a few cellphone-sized models locally.
you can see exactly how Fing useless this whole idea will be for nearly all cases of trying to get anything useful with ah high degree of inaccuracy from it.
If you're stupid enough to hand any control of your life to Openclaw, then you deserve all the bad things you will inevitably get. Let's just call openclaw "Darwin in action"
No what is un-slashdot worthy is posting a reply while clearly being completely uninformed about the subject.
OK Mr. smarty pants. Please inform yourself about the case, (watching Moment of Contact is a good entree) then you provide a rational alternative hypothesis to us all.
I suggest you inform yourself about the case, perhaps watch "Moment of Contact" first, before you make a fool of yourself by posting a derisory "noting unusual happened" post.
A lot of apparently credible people (including doctors etc) have a common story. A cop actually died as a result of handling the alien. You can;t simply make a death up and it's clearly being covered up by governments. There are too many credible witnesses to say nothing happened at all. The only question is what.
Yes it really has.Just some (far from all) more recent examples where Dems have tried to remove personal freedoms:
Gun ownership and Second Amendment Rights, Healthcare Mandates (The ACA), COVID-19 Mandates (Vaccines/Masks), Environmental Regulations, multiple Labor and Economic Regulations.
Before you incorrectly label me a Republican, I don't support them either.
You mean Unreal Tournament 3? That was 19 years ago, and it sold well and got good reviews.
It's pretty depressing what happened, actually, because on paper, it was awesome. The base game was free, and it even had a new game mode called Blitz. The amount of maps it shipped with was pretty meager, but the goal was to have modders sell their maps/mods/skins/etc as IAPs within the game and then they got a cut. The game still allowed for private/dedicated servers, and while it lacked some of the polish of UT3, the framework was there and it really worked well as a de facto tech demo for UE4, and was surprisingly stable for an alpha release.
The problem, of course, was that Fortnite quickly became their money printer, limiting how much effort they put into developing the base game, before they finally canned it.
I'm still really bummed about it; I really liked the pre-alpha version I got to play with some friends for a bit.
History has shown us that if anything, Democrats are even less inclined to personal liberty than Republicans.
All it takes is one "think of the children" argument and all the Dems will be lining up to sign.
..with only US-made gear, the NSA can get their hooks and backdoors in everywhere?
China isn't the one running a ham-fisted trade war, starting multiple shooting wars wars and threatening to annex their supposed allies. The USA is screwing over everyone. China looks like the safer bet at this point.
>> these monsters to persuade others (or even believe) they are authorized by god
This is just one more reason to not be religious (I mean besides the complete lack of empirical evidence that any gods even exist).
You may not like it, but they are part of what they consider their product features, and they won't simply gimp them.
The request isn't to "gimp" the product features, it's to GIVE USERS THE ABILITY TO OPT-OUT. Users should have the ability to say "no thanks", and Microsoft should allow Windows to behave accordingly. If the argument is that an opt-out control is "gimping product features", then it implies that Microsoft believes users MUST have them, which is a faulty premise that should be corrected...because a $599 Macbook doesn't require iCloud.
Yahoo Mail is still a thing, and they run news aggregation sites in a bunch of regions, often partnering with a local TV station or newspaper.
So the (elected) president (is supposed to) act in the interest of the country/American people. So yeah there is a rationale for a law there. whether you personally agree with what he decides is basically irrelevant to the law. Your only say comes at election time.
Re: murdering people being OK as long as they are overseas. Of course murder isn't ever OK but rightly or wrongly it is generally held by every government and nearly all religions that a) people die in war and b) it's not the same as murder. Presumably because both governments and religions like to be able to start and also justify their wars.
Also my admittedly vague understanding of US law (I'm not American) is that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 does allow Trump the freedom to unilaterally act for up to 60/90 days before he has to pull out or get congressional authorisation to continue.
Again if you don't like it, tell your congressman and use your vote.
I'm not on either side, I'm just trying to be fact-based and informed rather than simply base a ranty argument only on feelings, and who I like/dislike personally.
>> But what *is* 'illegal' really?
You seem to be implying that "illegal" is just based on some arbitrary line, such that it's morally ok to cross the line as long as it benefits you. I know this is common thinking in the USA but I think it's very wrong.
It seems to me that mostly what "illegal" boils down to is "doing things that (directly or indirectly) hurt other people in the same society that you live in".
The finest eloquence is that which gets things done.
