Comment Oh, boy! (Score 2) 21
Another YouTube "epic reaction" video! I can't wait to see how this three-plus-hours-long one differs from the 37 billion other epic reaction videos!
Another YouTube "epic reaction" video! I can't wait to see how this three-plus-hours-long one differs from the 37 billion other epic reaction videos!
Web browsers are absolute hogs, and, in part, that's because web sites are absolute hogs.
Yeah, I was gonna say... it's probably not Gnome itself that's the memory hog, it's almost certainly the demands from the web browser and / or email client. *
We have a computing lab which runs Linux + Gnome. Students are in the GUI almost all the time, but they're mostly running various engineering applications - they're not checking their personal email, and typically they're not randomly browsing the web. If there's only one or two students on there (remote access does get used a lot), htop typically shows < 2GB of memory usage - and almost no load.
* Not that I particularly want to defend Gnome; I think, design-wise, it's become a rather user-hostile window manager.
I think I understand why he never got anywhere with these. And no, it wasn't because of the web...
Not really. Care results fairly closely match Sweden’s once adjusting for confounding factors like weight, addiction, crime, genetics, and various statistical quirks (for example, Sweden doesn’t nearly as aggressively count premature birth deaths as infant mortality).
I agree with the last part in parethenses. Do you have citations for the rest?
Core vaccine schedule recommendations remain unchanged, and there’s zero proof of significant impact or negative impact.
Not for lack of trying. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/judge-blocks-rfk-jr-from-scaling-back-childhood-vaccine-recommendations.
Canceling federal funding for one particular research program at arguably the richest university in the world - with literally billions in endowments that it’s free to use - isn’t “cancelling all the mRNA research ”.
Bwah? The article I linked to is on Harvard's news site. It is not just about Harvard. As that article notes there's been about 500 million dollars of contracts canceled. Note that even if that were all Harvard (which it isn't) that would be a sizable chunk even in their endowment. And this has on top of that had a major chilling effect causing corporations to stop doing mRNA treatment research in general.
Apparently Waze exists for the sole purpose of avoiding speed traps.
I never knew that... guess I've been using it wrong all these years. I use it to minimize the time I spend on my daily commute.
As more and more datacenters were being announced, some skeptics kept asking about how datacenters would be powered and cooled. There was concern that the infrastructure was not adequate. "Trust me bro," always seem to be the answer. It turns out building megawatt datacenters requires a great deal of meticulous planning. Who knew?
I completely agree with this. My state was all about banning ICE vehicles and gas stoves and furnaces in about a decade...but had very few plans to handle the terawatt capacity requirements...and this was *before* datacenters got a seat at the table.
Something else that has been brought up is that with delays, the hardware in these datacenters might be obsolete by the time they are built.
I'm...not quite sure I agree with this one as much...
AI always needs the latest and greatest processors.
This...I think, has some wiggle room. Sure, training new models requires greater amounts of compute power, and as newer models and services develop, there will be a need to increase compute power. However, that doesn't mean that older models are useless. They may not be front-and-center, but they can still be used in lesser capacities. ChatGPT 3.5 isn't quite as awesome as v5, but if it's what is used to serve up ads in ChatGPT sessions, the hardware is still perfectly fit-for-purpose. Same goes for Google or Microsoft - older boards may not be front-and-center, but they can still do boring, smaller-scope tasks that are still useful.
Investors might start asking too many questions about what happened to their investments.
...we can only hope.......
It baffles the mind that Microsoftware - known for decades for being unreliable shit - is allowed on space missions at all, no matter how uncritical the role. The potential for malware alone is ludicrous. "Hey, pay us 2500 bitcoins if you want your space capsule back".
Then again, I figure the days when NASA did the right stuff are long past.
I mean, that's what people said about Michelle Obama when she proposed a lot of this stuff a decade or more ago...
Seems IT is amateur-hour even in space.
Look, they JUST finished their migration away from Lotus Notes...
"Skyrocketed" above 5%, you say?
"As this shocking graph indicates..." (sorry, I couldn't find a larger image)
Memory fault -- brain fried