Apple made that "pledge" in February. The tariffs were announced in March and the "break" in tariffs came in April. If the exemption was meant to reward cooperation, why would it happen like this? It seems completely backwards to how agreements are usually done.

This situation has led to significant consequences for Apple, including a sharp drop in stock value, large costs from urgently shipping large amount of inventory by air (a more expensive option) to get ahead of the tariffs, and potential internal issues as Apple adapts its cope with a moving tariff target. How could any of these outcomes be seen as a reward for Apple for the February pledge?

Are you suggesting that every exempt smartphone, computer, and gadget out there is secretly an Apple product, or that Apple’s recycled promises from 2018 and 2021 are somehow granting everyone a magical exemption card?

Sounds less like the art of the deal and more like the art of false credit.

Apple made the same promises in 2018 and 2021. It's basically a recycled pledge. Classic Trump style - taking credit for something that was already happening and calling it a win.

Trump never changes, talks a big game but can't back it up when someone stands up against him.

Yeah.

Every time I've had to go through a US border, it's like they are purposefully trying to pick a fight, just for their own amusement. No other country does this.

The fact that you're trying to equate harassment with free speech says a lot about you.

I agree with the expel then answer. I see what you are suggesting, but the students weren't using the AI as a tool, but as a way to cheat. This isn't any different then using a camera to take a picture and then claiming it was something you "painted". A tool was used, but not to help, but to completely do.

I'm fine with using the AI to brainstorm, make suggestions, or even help with grammar and spelling. But once you tell it "do the whole thing for me", then you aren't doing any work/learning and are just cheating.

Most likely because it's not AOSP, and only just became available. Same reason why DeX isn't on LineageOS.

You can buy games for an XBox/Playstation from your local game store, they aren't limited to just the online market place. This makes it considered access to a 3rd party (different stores can and do charge different prices for the same game). Apple doesn't allow this, you can only buy apps/games on the iOS App Store.

It was supposed to fly to the Indian Ocean for a controlled re-entry, half the world away. Instead it exploded shortly after takeoff over Florida. It didn't even get close to what it was supposed to test. Tests are supposed to test certain parameters, not explode randomly at the start. This makes it a failure.

I know, it's hard, but you can learn.

Or would it be more GPS-WPA3?

"My battery died"

App doesn't work without power to the phone, and it's not always easy or even possible to charge a phone in the airport. Some just plain don't have charging options, and many that do are just broken because so many others abused the plugs.

And yes, accidents happen and there could be real reasons that the battery is dead by the time they get to the airport/flight (you have to have your ticket scanned before entering the flight.) (I've had a few times that my battery drained very fast because roaming in another EU country had issues connecting to a local network.)

And how is it different?

>> The ARM architecture is based on RISC principles.

Thats like saying Windows and Mac are also based on the same principles (GUI based OS).

I think it's more "You allow China full access to iCloud accounts in China. If you can do it for them, you could do it for us "

https://support.apple.com/en-us/111754