You can always count on the alphabet douche bag to provide his very best commentary.

Why yes! They do have a Joe Biden model, but I think you have weight incorrect. For a nominal fee he will explain that he has hairy legs that turn â" that â" that â" that turn â" um, blonde in the sun. And the kids used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down so it was straight and watch the hair come back up again. They'd look at it. So, I learned about roaches, I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I've loved kids jumping on my lap.

-He is not a rapist, nor does any sane person believe he is. Repeating the lie often enough, doesn't change the lie. Using other people's tragedy to further your own conspiracy theory is evil.

-There are several online. I linked to the authoritative source, which is sufficient. Your lack of belief is irrelevant as you don't get to pick and choose.

-Blaming every issue on the current administration is a well-worn political technique, nothing more. If I were as obtuse as you, I'd dig up the top ten Joe Biden calamities, but sadly I'm not. I recognize that a federal government is a massive bureaucratic body of regulations. There is no such thing as a four year tenure without missteps and teaching moments.

As to Iran, he's doing exactly what I voted for. Much like you, Iran will not just quietly learn from their mistakes and modify their behavior. It's going to take punitive action, which I'm happy to see. We started this endeavor in February of this year, only a partisan hack would complain that the mission has yet to be accomplished, as of July.

It makes me happy to see you so upset as it's a symptom of course correction. Trump is a sign that the democracy is working as intended. If you wish to find signs of western decay, simply turn to Europe, where Henry Nowak was stabbed, handcuffed and subsequently died because a Sikh decided to murder him and then cry racism. Because of the policing policy, the man's last moments on earth were in handcuffs, because words are a crime in England. That is western decay. Men in dresses invading women's spaces is western decay. Open border policies designed to allow in the worst of this world, is western decay. No my friend, President Trump is not a sign of a declining democracy. He is a sign of a government functioning for the people, by the people, as intended all along. The people of course, being the citizens of the United States.

You're never going to be able to reconcile the fact that President Trump has never been convicted of a crime, of a sexual nature.
DOGE saved my country 10s of billions of dollars. despite the Democrats best efforts.
Sorry, bro. There's nothing you can do about it.

Folks, this is a wonderful example of why I still visit Slashdot. I find it interesting how mental disorders manifest. It's not simply that an individual has a skewed world view, it's the details within that view that interest me.

You were sold a lie and you bought it. There is no Jan, why can't you reference the correct person? The E. Jean Carroll matter was a civil case, nothing more. Civil cases shift the burden to the accused and are utlized when a criminal case would otherwise fail due to lack of evidence. There is no pardon money flowing through the whitehouse. It's a smear campaign to discredit the process. A president has wide latitude to pardon, period. For example, President Biden pardoned James Biden, Joe's younger brother; Sara Jones Biden, James' wife; Valerie Biden Owens, Joe's younger sister; John T. Owens', Valerie's husband; and Francis W. Biden, Joe's younger brother. He also pardoned his son Hunter and several members of Joe's administration. I didn't have a problem with these pardons as the president can issue a pardon at his discretion, but it is amazing how the man pardoned a significant portion of his family and his political allies without complaint from a single Democrat. It's almost as if a political process is at play here.

Cherry picking half truths and then leaping to an erronious conclusion is not healthy for you. You have linked to political stories which at best, mildy prop up your contorted logic. Why switch gears with the q&a. You and I both know the answer is no for both questions.

Do you really believe what you wrote? There is a pattern here, both in your responses and the responses of a small set of SD users. Much of what is stated is treated as a foregone conclusion. There is nothing left to discuss beyond why others fail to see what you see. Why do you think so many people are blind? Is it that you and a select few are privy to some keen insight? Or are you just defective in processing information? With so many puported crimes, why has no one prosecuted? Are you sure people have died? Your screeds have more than a slight odor of conspiracy theory. What concerns me is that you honestly believe the US government has killed people. That the evil trillionaire bumbled through cleaning up fiscal malfeasance. A task that is arguably trivial to complete. Every sane person understands that large government bodies lean towards fiscal waste. It's a by-product of an unwieldy set of regulation.

Nope, not like Elon's trillion at all. The number came from a liar who complained about corruption. The irony of lying when complaining of a government lie. The reality is that Elon and his committee saved the US taxpayer on the order of 10s of billions. Not the targeted goal, but a lofty effort none the less.

I see. None of the links mention 3 trillion. In fact, the articles go out of their way to mention significantly less numbers, but that's ok. It appears to be prefectly fine to make up your own numbers when you disagree with the accounting metholodology.

The money was returned to the agencies that originally held the affected budget, why pretend otherwise. No idea what orifice you pulled 3 trillion from.

Pearl-clutching is an idiomatic expression used to describe a reaction of shock, disapproval, or moral outrage in response to something perceived as scandalous, outrageous, or indecent. The term "pearl-clutching" is believed to have originated from the image of clutching one's pearls as a physical manifestation of shock or alarm. The idiom is typically used to mock or criticize individuals who overreact or feign surprise at something deemed commonplace or trivial by others.