Didn't Biden lie about intentionally letting in 20M illegal aliens without background checks, and without even counting them, and claiming had no way of stopping them anyway? Just before Trump did it on his first day?

How about the thousands of lies Democrats have pumped out over the last 13 years about Trump? Have you ever visited the propaganda factories that are Reddit, MSNBC, or Vox?

Yeah, politicians and their media allies lie when their mouths are open. Trump can never tell enough lies to catch up to the left.

If you cared about the little guy, you'd oppose a union that's going to accelerate them losing their jobs.

The future is EVs and driverless cars. Tesla's cabs are $~8 per ride, not even half that of an Uber, and you don't have to tip them!

Who is gonna want to to pay for an Uber when they top $30 per 15 minute ride to pay for union demands, or the company becomes so inflexible they can't make changes without union permission?

Have your head examined, please.

When they start demanding higher wages, they'll ensure their own demise at the hands of driverless cars. Probably whey this got through a state congress so notoriously hostile to the little guy.

So their claim is they don't "continuously" record and send your conversations back to the CCP?

Good, that would have been completely different. /s

This message brought to you by the CCP.

Love that clip! Unfortunately the "the world is sinking" crowd still adamantly refuses to build boats.

If everything is expanding at the same rate, it's the only possible conclusion. If it really were a 'bang' (an explosion with a single source) acceleration would be slower the further away from the source of the bang. And it's not.

Every point in the universe is expanding away from every other point, at the same rate. That means the source of the expansion is in the empty space between us, and there is no way to detect the center of the universe this way.

And yet their problems are not cause by racial discrimination. White people live there, too, and have the same issues, and other areas with white people are poor as well.

It's almost as if racism is not the problem, other things are.

2. California... I see, you also hate the bureaucracy in, say, Norway, etc. California does *more* for its citizens.

Just never the poor ones. But they sure do promote a lot of black chicks.

It's almost as if they care about appearances and not solving real people's problems. A perfect microcosm of wokeness.

Name one instance of "systemic racism" that's actually racism, not just economic inequality.

Oh, and stop looking at your dick.

The correct approach would have been to laser focus on actual directly racist policy inequalities, better education for all, and on broader economic opportunity in economically depressed areas.

Instead, we blamed everything into race and did affirmative action instead. Now we're making it worse with DEI programs, which are just quota based affirmative action, plus Soviet style forced indoctrination programs (or you lose your job).

And still no one can name any evidence of institutional racism. Economic inequality is not racism because it affects all people.

Focus on economic opportunity, not race, and you'll see race inequality start to disappear.

Affirmative Action has been around for 2-3 generations. The cost has been enormous, it's getting far more extreme, and it's done nothing that wouldn't have happened quicker without creating huge negative incentives and cultural problems.

BTW, AoC sure loves to talk about "woke." :D

It's "whitewashing" if you do it, "anti-racist" if they do it. :D

The problem is the "systemic inequalities" are economic inequalities, NOT race inequalities. DEI focuses on the wrong problem and therefore makes it worse, not better. But it sure does employ a LOT of extremely well paid race hucksters across the government and corporate America, and so has grown into a disgusting beast with a dogma all its own, as you expressed with your "breaking a bone" nonsense.

Because those southern states had been required by law to artificially increase black representation for decades. The Supreme Court said there's no longer any evidence of insititutional racism in voting there, so they removed the artificial inflation of black representation.

Black participation in the next elections didn't fall, hence proving your characterization of this as institutional racism was false.

But you'll stick to your story, damn the evidence. That's how dogma works!