Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Constructive responses anyone? (Score -1) 70

So it couldn't possibly be that the new software simply isn't as good and lacks important or useful features?

I've worked on government software projects before and my guess is extremely little of the allocated funds got to the contractors actually writing the software. They probably hired one or two programmers maximum and gave them a two or three months to throw something together, then said 'oh no, the money ran out' and shat out what they had percolating.

$10M spent, maybe $50K in the developers' paychecks.

Comment Re: Pay people better (Score -1) 191

Why would it stop at 4 if we can't make it stop at 8, before the economic calamity of population collapse sets in? And how do a handful of children pay for the benefits of a massive glut of old people?

Or is this another problem sticking your head in the sand will solve, like the national debt and climate change?

Comment Re: Pay people better (Score -1) 191

We aren't facing resource and climate collapse, and the choices aren't so apocalyptic.

The first is a really stupid claim that people have been saying since the 60s and it never seems to get any closer because technology keeps advancing.

As for climate collapse, if that happens, first, blame the environmentalists for making nuclear near impossible to build in a reasonable time frame (except in China, for some reason). Then, shoot youself cuz no total reorganization of society is gonna help.

Yes, the question is always a political one, but it's not cataclysmic, yet.

Comment Re:Not enough (Score 0) 191

People can get sex from porn, and without string attached. It's way easier, everyone's way hotter, and it makes normal sex seem not worth the effort.

It would destroy my personal life, but it seems the only solution in this entire comment section that seems even remotely doable and which hasn't been tried and failed.

Comment Re:Pay people better (Score 0, Interesting) 191

Luckily a world of 8 billion human beings doesn't need a high birth rate. And a future with automation and AI won't have much use for cheap human labor, which is really where population growth is economically important.

A world of 8 billion humans and very low birth rates isn't going to have 8 billion humans for long without higher birth rates. And without consumers, what are those robots gonna make, or sell it to?

Anyway, the real, immediate danger is entire social safety net is entirely based on having way more young people paying in than old people taking out. With so few kids being born, how's that supposed to work?

Slashdot Top Deals

The only way to learn a new programming language is by writing programs in it. - Brian Kernighan

Working...