Sun had a vision.
Just Java was an inspiration to many.
Oracle bought it up.
And snuffed out all the joy.

We need to start a movement.

Something to bring together everyone who has had enough of prejudice, the calculated prejudice of the left, the mindless prejudice of the right, all of it.

"DND" for "Do Not Discriminate" ?

If Trump is hiring white men because they are white men, please do call him out.
Racism and sexism is wrong, from whichever side it comes.

The more activists pretend to be offended on behalf of other people over shit like this and, as here, *get away with it*, the more likely Trump and co will remain in power forever.

Don't let them get away with it in your workplace - change Main back to Master, call out the DEI hires, point and laugh at beardy men in the women's washroom.
Make society sane again.

New Scientist used to write good, accurate stories about hard science.

Then a female editor took over and at once stage the top was all women. Because manhate.

Under her rule it reported mostly fluffy soft science stories and inaccurately reported science. As here.

Inconvenient facts, and nothing to do with who wrote this story, you hateful fucking misandrist cunt.

1. You started your comments with "Jesus Christ [...]opiniated idiots", you stupid fucking cunt.

2. And in conclusion: You are actually this stupid.

1. This is one observation that shows two merged black holes have an event horizon with an area not smaller that of the sum of the event horizons of the merging black holes.
How is that a PROOF of a theorem stating that "when two black holes merge, the resulting black hole's event horizon -- the boundary beyond which not even light can escape the clutches of a black hole -- *cannot* have an area smaller than the sum of the two original black holes" ?!

It shows that in this case it is not smaller than the sum, it DOES NOT PROVE that it cannot be smaller.

2. Is this theorem really "Stephen Hawking's Black Hole Theorem" ? Did he have no other black hole theorems?

New Scientist used to be good. Then the girls took over.

FFS. Really ? I am not sure if you are pretending to be this stupid or are actually this stupid.

People who buy overpriced, thin, fragile phablets cannot store them in convenient pockets because they will break.
People who buy thick, small, solid phones can. And do. Because that is convenient.
You stupid cunt.
This is an rational response, not an emotional one.

Yes, you're right. People who buy products that last actually want products that don't, but won't admit it.
Fuckwit.

<sigh>

I want a quality, thick, small, solid phone that won't break when I sit on it or drop it.

I don't want an expensive and easily broken phablet, only fuckwits like you do.

"the presence of vivianite and iron sulfide, both of which can be produced chemically, sounds like a really weak indicator to me."

TFA:
"there are ways to produce them without biological reactions, including sustained high temperatures, acidic conditions, and binding by organic compounds. However, the rocks at Bright Angel do not show evidence that they experienced high temperatures or acidic conditions, and it is unknown whether the organic compounds present would&rsquo;ve been capable of catalyzing the reaction at low temperatures."

My phone doesn't break.
Because it is a quality, thick, small, solid phone.
Because it is not an overpriced, wafer-thin, shiny Apple phablet.
I can handily put my phone in my back jeans pocket and not worry about breaking it.
I do not have to look stupid with it in a front pocket or have to carry an equally fucking stupid man bag
Because I am not a stupid sheep.

Oh FFS.

I keep my phone in my back trouser pocket.

That means when I sit down, I might sit on my phone.

A quality, thick, small, solid phone won't break if I sit on it.
An overpriced, wafer-thin, shiny Apple phablet will.

Now fuck off.

Is one with no cars on it.

I want my phone to handle non-delicate treatment, such as not breaking when I keep it in my back jeans pocket and sit down.

It says a lot that there are so many idiot sheep like you who have been brainwashed into thinking that that is an unreasonable requirement of a device costing hundreds of dollars.