Soooo, can we expect long file paths to work in File Explorer in another 31 years ?

Microsoft are great.

"GLP-1s make you go blind" ?

Meh, that's what they said about masturbation.

And this braille keyboard works just fine.

It's total shits Reddit that try to force readers to log in and then to download an app to read a fucking single review on an internet forum.

FUCK YOU.

Return of the Living Dead was full of nasty surprises ?

With you.
The news makes me happy, the misleading headline makes me angry.

If only the "Editors" here could edit.

AFAICT, Mars had lava flows recently ( in geological time ) and we knew that at least 8 years ago:

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia22432-young-lava-flows/

A common giveaway of bias is when a news outlet has headlines like "Outcry over X !", when X is something the news outlet opposes, and "Outcry over NOT X !" would have been just as (un)justified.

Whenever Trump takes a loss, I make it a point to watch Fox News to see how they spin it.

CNN etc have been unbearable since Trump 2. I could only think "YES, WE KNOW HE'S FUCKING AWFUL, FFS, WE KNOW ! TELL US ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE !"

Fox News will be unwatchable if the democrats go full retard woke, but it will be great watching CNN trying to spin trannies and islam as good for women's rights, for example.

Yes, Jensen, of course it was.

> > I WANT THE FACTS OF THE NEWS, PERIOD.
  >
  > Can you name a news outlet which has only facts?

No. I think Reuters comes the closest, but it is often not hard to see that their reporters share certain worldviews.

"When Salon launched in November 1995 [...] A small group of journalists set out to create something original: a publication with a strong voice"

And by "a strong voice", they mean "a strong left wing voice".

There are enough biased left-wing news sites, TV channels, radio stations, etc etc.
And enough biased right-wing ones.

I don't want that. I WANT THE FACTS OF THE NEWS, PERIOD.
Keep your dumb opinions out of it. I will form my own opinions, BASED ON THE FACTS.

Why can't we have that ?

Often the problem is not that they increase prices, but that there is not enough net capacity to supply them.

So choices have to be made between, say, building houses for people or building data centres. And we see who keeps winning that discussion.

Yeah, why do we bother testing our software when we can just skip it and see the problems in production.

As long as we are increasing Sam Altman's net worth, who are we to complain about the price of RAM and the lack of vegetation on our once fertile planet ?

Yes, I don't know how far along Spacex are with ground tests for the tankers and refuelling, but if they don't have ice buildup / boiloff / valve problems, I will be very impressed.

But then again, if they are really launching one per week by 2027H2, they can have plenty of attempts.