Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Good post, I'd mod you up if I had points (Score 1) 476

You're literally advocating for socialism.

Actually... The subsidies we currently have are socialist. Likewise the public option.

Mind you, I supported the ACA as Obama drafted it, when it included the public option. I also believe he should not have signed it as it returned to his desk.

Perhaps, if you'd address the first part of my post, the real point I was making, which was made in the first paragraph, you'd understand what I'm actually advocating for. Rather, you chose to cherry-pick a part of my post which appears to support your position only when taken out of context; then, you go ahead and completely mis-state your own argument on top of it.

Bravo. I now get to profit by selling popcorn to the audience ahead of the argument I'm sure you're gearing up for.

Comment Re:way too generous (Score 2) 476

Part of me wants to think that Trump is purposely setting himself up to fail. Why would he do this? Because if he, with all of his money and influence, can fail, maybe we as a nation will see that money does not, and should not, equal "right", and will finally vote for change.

Of course, then the rational side of me speaks up to remind that this would be the most un-Trump thing ever and that he's going to fail despite his best efforts. We're fucked.

Comment Re:Or it could be globalism (Score 2) 476

Meanwhile, I wasn't afforded the opportunity to put my life in the line for my country. Why? An ADHD (mis)diagnosis when I was 11. Why? Because any kid who's not doing their schoolwork must just not be paying attention; fuck the fact that I wasn't doing it as the year went by because I worked through all of my courses in the first couple months of the school year. It's not possibly anything to do with the fact that I was so focused, driven, and intelligent that I had already done the work by the time it was assigned and, instead, chose to occupy myself furthering my learning beyond where the school system wanted me to be at that point. No, the boomers in charge couldn't be assed to pay attention to what was really going on and, instead, labeled me as unable to focus, and lacking drive, though they did acknowledge my advanced intellignece.

Why? Because taking opportunities away from me and filing me away as a problem was easier than promoting my abilities.

And here's where I differ from most who shared my experience: I fought it. I took back the opportunities that were taken from me. At least, as much as possible; I still wasn't allowed to serve my country the way I wanted, despite being fully qualified to do so.

Comment Re:Or it could be globalism (Score 1) 476

Right. I seem to recall, as a child, having a 4% interest rate on my savings account. Maybe that was a CD, I don't fully recall at this point, but what I do know is that those rates are a thing of the past. Gone are the days of putting $500 (what I had saved by age 9) into a CD and having $520 to roll over a year later. Now? The best I can find leaves me rolling over a balance of $1042.90 after 3 years on a $1000 minimum deposit. That's $507.50 on $500 after the first year, a 62.5% reduction in earning potential.

But no, millenials have all the same opportunities today as their parents did 30 years ago, what with interest rates not pacing inflation so things we save for end up costing more than if we buy them today. How? Because the $40,000 car we start saving for today at 1.41% APY is gonna be a $24,000 car in 5 years (assuming the 1.7% inflation rate doesn't increase, which has been the trend) by the time we've saved up the $44,000. We'll be a few hundred short by the time we save up the additional $4,000 but, after 7 years, we can finally buy our $45,000 car. Contrast that with the $13,000 price tag our parents had on the same class of car, coupled with interest rates nearer to 4% and inflation nearer to 3.8% and, well, you can already see the interest rates outpaced inflation 31 years ago (I would have said 30 years, but inflation was only 1.1% in 1986 and I'm trying to be fair to my parents), and that's before you consider that, without a degree, the average salary is the same $36,000 today as it was back then, no adjustment for inflation so that $36,000 only goes about half as far after 31 years of inflation. No, really, go look up the data and do the math, we're up 44.519% over 1985 prices.

Anyway, since our parents could stretch the same $36,000 twice as far, they could also save twice as much each year for a car that cost less than 1/3 as much meaning that, even without interest, they could save for their $13,000 car in less than 2 years, at which point they'd have saved $16,000 for a car that would then cost $14,000. Again, before interest. With interest, they'd have closer to $17,000 in the bank, so they could not only afford the car, but also all the options and maybe take their folks out to a nice dinner the night they bought it. And that in less than 1/3 of the time we millenials could do the same.

So, that's assuming no college education. What about that college degree? Well, according to the data at hand, the median wage for someone with a college degree in the 1908's (regardless of debt - take the average of those numbers) falls just shy of $72,000. Today? Just over $56,300. Remember that $72,000 today would stretch about half as far as it did back then. $56,300? That goes about 40% as far as the $72,000 of 30 years ago. That's right, college educated millenials are worth about 40% as much as their college educated parents; that's worse than those without a degree. Sure, they can save up for that car in 5 years instead of 7, but that sure as fuck ain't no 2 years, and doesn't include all the extras, or dinner for Mom and Pop.

Yeah, we have all the opportunities our parents had. For sure.

I'm just happy I was able to position myself, without a degree, to make twice what my dad did with one, so I can continue almost living the same life he did earning $50k before he had me. I also realize that I possess exceptional intelligence (top 5%) and a very strong drive for success; I can't imagine the average millenial, even college educated, even driven, having what I have today, and the numbers support that. I know a lot of people in my age group who are equally successful, no special snowflake here, but they're all of similar intelligence and drive; the other 95% aren't going to achieve what I have.

That's depressing, because I haven't achieved anything of note.

Comment Re:Good post, I'd mod you up if I had points (Score 1) 476

and insurance companies charging whatever the hell they want

Well, TBH, insurance was cheaper before the ACA, so that wouldn't be so bad. When I say cheaper, I mean I now pay more for barely-there coverage than I was paying for a no-deductible, no-copay plan pre-ACA and, while the best plan I can get costs nearly 4x as much as I was paying previously, I get to choose between a $2600/yr deductible or a 10% copay at that level. I can't get what I had at any price, so I can't even tell you how much more expensive it is; we'll say 5x, though, if you count the deductible simply as additional premium.

Sure, if you're poor enough that you qualify for subsidies, it's "cheaper", but the insurance companies are still charging more, even at those levels; taxpayers are simply picking up the tab.

The ACA would be great if, instead of subsidies for the lower classes, it set pricing limits on insurance and, in order to make those realistic, the procedures covered by said insurance. If that turned out to not be enough to make health care affordable (you know, actually lowering the real costs of a thing is usually a much more effective methodof making that thing affordable than simply shifting those costs to a different line item on the same invoice), we could still offer subsidies; and much smaller ones, at that.

Instead, what we got is the poor paying out of pocket*, the middle class paying full price for the coverage the poor get at a discount and still not being able to afford the deductible after the premiums, and the rich paying out of pocket as they always have, while Congress is exempt from all of it.

* Or, rather, failing to pay the $6300 deductible and $75 copay on top of whatever amount of premiums they also can't afford, effectively changing nothing as they can't afford to use the insurance they already couldn't afford to pay for. Remember, the subsidies only cover premiums, not deductible or copay amounts, and the largest subsidies only mostly cover the cheapest plans. For example, the $6300 deductible + $75 copay plan I found through Kaiser, literally the cheapest plan I could find, costs $239.14/mo, or 70 cents/mo with the largest possible subsidy in my state (if you make enough to qualify for a larger subsidy, the state already has programs that fully cover you). For reference, that is the state of California, where someone earning $20,000/yr and paying 70 cents per month for insurance won't be able to afford a single $75 copay, let alone the $6300 he must pony up before that $75 copay even applies. Of course, the same can be said in Ohio, where someone earning $20,000/yr and paying 70 cents per month for insurance may be able to afford a $75 copay, but that is rendered totally irrelevant by the $6300 deductible reducing their $17000 net income to $10700, an amount they simply won't get by on.

Llke you, I thought the ACA would be a good thing. Unlike you, I quickly realized it is not.

Comment Re:I'm confused... (Score 1) 88

Speed x Time = Limit

Even without artificial limits, there is still a physical limit to the speed and, well, billing periods are fixed as well, so there's the time limit. Again, Speed x Time = Limit.

At least, that's the argument Verizon customers throw in my face to explain how their 4GB/mo limit on a $90/mo plan (at least, the last time i had the argument) is better than my "unlimited" (on which I use 30+GB/mo regularly) plan for $70.

Slashdot Top Deals

The IBM 2250 is impressive ... if you compare it with a system selling for a tenth its price. -- D. Cohen