Comment Re:Why do people want bigger vehicles? (Score 1) 250
You know as well as me that people use their cars to compensate for their deficiencies.
You know as well as me that people use their cars to compensate for their deficiencies.
Car manufacturers should be taken to the woodshed over this awful decision.
Why not the car buyers? The manufacturers are only responding to what buyers want. The petty arms race in our streets needs to stop!
It is deeply embarassing that Microsoft needs produce so many patches in a single month.
But consistent with past behavior (it's not a bug, it's a feature!), Microsoft is again twisting the truth.
3) a man with no arms and one leg will be a reminder for decades.
Haven''t you learned anything from Russian history? Don't you really know how Stalin dealt with many of the cripples from WW II? Putin will most likely do the same, so public life will not be tainted by the presence of war invalids.
Your constant hunger is as much a result of habits or boredom as of an empty stomach.
When I did my masters, I was forced to use the crappy MS Fortran compiler of the day, and resolved I will not go to lunch before the code compiles. Turns out that I reached this state only at 3 or 4 in the afternoon when the canteen had long closed. Did that for a week and felt no hunger around lunchtime anymore.
So your habit of stuffing something in your mouth every two hours makes sure you will feel hungry after the next two hours. Yes, it does cost some discipline to break that habit, but you will be surprised how quickly you will adapt and will be able to work for a longer stretch. Same with boredom - your visit at the fridge is as much a result of desiring variety as of being hungry. Kick that habit, do something that keeps your mind occupied, and you will go without feeling the need to eat something for much longer stretches.
It is a matter of eating less, after all.
What [the National Design Studio] is doing is taking the parts of the federal government that touch you directly, your prescription, your voter registration, your passport, your federal login, out of the agencies that legally own them and rebuilding them on White House infrastructure. Vote.gov belongs to the Election Assistance Commission, and the studio built a copy. Passports belong to the State Department, and the studio is building a replacement this week. Login.gov belonged to GSA, and the studio’s guy runs it now.
Trump has said publicly that this infrastructure is for other presidents, and he is right about that. It is the one thing in this story I take him at his word on. The infrastructure outlasts him. Whoever wins in 2028 inherits the websites, the vendors, the data, and the hardware, sealed and waiting.
NDS Infrastructure Map — my live working github map of every National Design Studio subdomain I have found, filterable by status, registrant, and parent domain. If you want to retrace this investigation or watch new subdomains appear in real time, start here.
Airbus has a flight laws system. That flight laws system which would have told the pilot they were in a stall failed because of ice accumulation during a thunderstorm.
The pilot didn't know they were in the stall because the otherwise highly redundant system which should have warned him didn't work.
WRONG. The system was off, precisely because the sensor had faulty readings. Any pilot with a bit of Airbus training should have been able to read the state the autopilot was in (Direct Law), because there is an illuminated indicator for this. In an Airbus A340, a reversion from Normal Law to Direct Law is explicitly indicated to the crew on the FMA (Flight Mode Annunciator) at the top of each Primary Flight Display. In Direct Law, most protections are off and the stick commands are directly used for control deflections precisely because the basis for the proper functioning of the protections is not present anymore. This is to protect the pilot from computer errors. Of course, this assumes a halfway competent pilot at the controls and not a complete idiot.
To use a car analogy: You are basically arguing that the car shouldn't have skidded with the brake pedal fully depressed, because the antilock system should have worked. But in that case, the equivalent to the antilock system had switched itself off because the inputs for its proper operation were not available.
Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and think what nobody else has thought.