Comment Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him (Score 5, Insightful) 201
Well, to make a not so subtle point, there WAS an armed revolt, but it was in defense of all this, not in opposition.
Well, to make a not so subtle point, there WAS an armed revolt, but it was in defense of all this, not in opposition.
It's none of those things. It's just seething vitriol. Republican voters, who are predominantly poor, sick, and uneducated, have been told for years that they're poor and uneducated because of the only people on this earth who don't want them to be poor, sick, and uneducated. The GOP can't succeed without a huge tribe of victim voters who can only be trained in base instinctive behaviors like hate and violence.
Thats cute. Now put it in front of the public without the person on the other end following your demo script...
All of the sudden its shit.
My company has done this as well, and it works great for the guy who made it, who talks to it with knowledge of its capabilities and nuances... but then as soon as anyone with a slightly different choice of words comes along
Plus it never even occurred to the police or the prosecutors that they may have made a mistake. In their thinking that is not even possible.
Though, to be fair - this really isn't an important announcement - its just an improvement developers will appreciate - and a few guys that truly understand hypervisors. The rest of us, at best will say
While not entirely true in desktop land yet - increasingly, more and more things are containerized, then run inside virtualization
An remember, in order to type "<", you have to type "&lt;", and in order to type that you have to type "&amp;lt;", and in order to type that...
I wish this was completely true but I had a monitor I brought in from home to use on a work computer, and a mid-stage upgrade within Windows 11 caused the monitor to stop working at its native resolution and only work at 640x480. It was an older monitor and natively DVI on the monitor itself. I couldn't find a ready solution to the problem. Work ended up giving me an extra to replace mine.
I can only suspect that some kind of security setting was not being met, but either way it was really irritating.
It's a goddamn monitor. It should be compliant with video interface signaling standards and to be able to notify the system of what standards it complies with through the video interface itself or with minimal drivers that are basically just an FYI. Even if it has other features like audio capability, USB passthrough, or even some kind of software-based control of the monitor for some other reason, that shouldn't require crazy amounts of permissions to accomplish.
This sort of crap is what I hate about modern consumer electronics. It used to be that most peripherals didn't require much to function, and either software that ran at the user-level with minimal drivers or else features functioned directly onboard said device let it be controlled. This modern era where everything requires copious permissions and comes packed with malware is truly awful. And frankly Microsoft shares some blame here, for even allowing this in the first place.
If only there was a way to not connect these things to your network...
That will likely work for now, but it's only a matter of time before they do what cars do and include cell network connectivity. I'm sure the only reason they don't already is that it's harder to justify the cost on something in the $1k range (rather than the $30k+ for cars), but someday one of them will figure that ongoing revenue streams justify the connectivity costs.
I'd think that tractor tag-axle replacements could be a next logical step, even with no onboard batteries on the tractor and using an umbilical to the trailer's batteries, or else a small set of batteries in the truck, supplemented as needed by a large set of batteries on the trailer.
Nuff said
The whole process that split AT&T's System V and BSD should bear some weight here, at some point there was an agreement that, once BSD rewrote the few offending portions, AT&T had no claim anymore.
Frankly I'm surprised that the settlement between SCO and IBM didn't include verbiage that this was a done deal with no right for any successor-entity to bring this up again.
There are tons and tons of pathogens with high mortality rates without medical intervention. There are tons of pathogens that only see minimal death rates without active medical intervention because vaccination reduced the penetration that those pathogens have into the community and may have even forced evolution for increased transmissibility in lieu of virulence in order to spread at all.
I didn't get the feeling that the GP post was claiming it was valueless. I got the feeling that the concern was it would get out of the control of its creators, manage to mutate or evolve past a death in five generations, and become a threat to everything we know and love.
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.