Yeah, the privacy aspect of EFF doesn't align with social media in general IMHO.
Are they trying to "earn" some $ from social media? That's a silly goal, but might be a nice side benefit.
It's worse than that, because with proper skill, it isn't even a copy/pasta. It is one app that posts to everything all at once. Even the social media places that didn't make the list.
Buffer, Hootsuite, Metricool, Robopost or Later
One could probably tweak posts for each platform with AI effectively.
Here is the list they are staying with
Bluesky, Mastodon, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube
So, where did the audience go? It didn't go to the existing places from 20-8 years ago. And I doubt it went to the two new kids.
What this tells me is that their audience is aging/dying off, and the younger generations aren't there in numbers. This requires little to no political inferences to understand. It is easy to mistake one for the other.
Yes, I am a Boomer. I don't rely upon AI to tell me what to think. I am also a Libertarian and interested in Privacy and been a long time proponent of Open Source. Maybe figure out what intersections to the younger generations align and go there.
they were able to pass the physical.
Oh, come on, stop harping on Joe Biden's frailty — he's been out of office for over a year now!
But you don't read the generated binaries, do you? Not even the assembly text...
I've been wondering for many years before the first traffic camera appeared, why the toll-roads aren't enforcing the speed limits automatically. The time you enter and exit the highway is recorded down to a second. The distance between these two points is known — your average speed could be computed on the spot even with the early 90-ies technology...
The polite police officers would be standing right behind the toll-booths issuing tickets without the drama of hiding in the bushes, then chasing you at highway speeds...
And, yeah, you could lower it by stopping at a rest area — but it'd still be a tremendous disincentive to speed.
I was and continue to hope, that such universal enforcement, affecting all voters, would cause the limits to go up to reasonable figures — or even be abolished completely...
I've run into these people, they're the worst
When have you last checked your compiler's output?
produces higher quality sperm
That's really important for the sperm destined for the septic system, sure...
Using AI is training AI to replace you. If you can be replaced with AI, you will be, and should be.
If you don't use AI, your peers will be, and you will be replaced by AI anyway.
Good Luck
Lying to yourself is the biggest danger for trying to stay Anonymous. With enough patterns to recognize, the idea that one can hide is a delusional take.
The only way to win, is to run EVERYTHING you post through an AI that changes the tone and words used in all your online activity. But even then that may itself be a lie.
It's Not Enough to "Caution Against".
That language is TOO PASSIVE.
The correct and appropriate phrase is "HELL NO" and start tossing out 1st, 4th, 5th amendment claims IN COURT.
I read that and was simultaneously laughing and angry. I'd call it a load of horseshit, but that would be insulting to horseshit.
What a bunch of windbaggery. Meaningless, feckless corporate speak.
We know. They know we know. We know they know we know. They don't care.
Nothing says "fuck you" like a "well worded" press release. It was only missing the AI EM-DASH.
Climate is notoriously complex set of wild interactions that are unknown at best. Predictions of climate crisis have always been wildly off, because the goal is to scare people into action.
But the boy who cried wolf is a cautionary tale that climate people failed to learn.
Some people manage by the book, even though they don't know who wrote the book or even what book.
