Comment Re: Messages app? (Score 1) 77
* NOT AVAILABLE FOR SYSTEM APPS
(Samsung preinstalled apps are classified as system apps on Samsung phones)
False. Nearly all Samsung pre-installed apps are not classified as system apps.
* NOT AVAILABLE FOR SYSTEM APPS
(Samsung preinstalled apps are classified as system apps on Samsung phones)
False. Nearly all Samsung pre-installed apps are not classified as system apps.
If you campaign against that, then you are evil (and an airhead virtue signaller). Full stop. BLM, the worship of criminals, is over.
OMG ICE arrested Trump? Why I have not read about this!
Never mind, there's no having a rational conversation with you.
Alternatively your world view has a fragile basis in reality and you're too confronted by the idea that I may actually have a point.
Tell us more about how your religion doesn't have a fragile basis in reality.
We're talking about the impact feminist control over reproductive policy has had on the falling birthrate that has occurred. It would seem you are not capable of having a rational discussion with me when you come up with a non sequitur like that. I could talk to you in hard numbers however it clear your not prepared to have a sincere conversation about them and what it means, which is a shame because I actually respect some of your views.
It seems you think I'm against abortion, I'm not. What's concerning is if you look at the abortion rate for the last year it makes up about 90% of the falling birth rate when excluding all other considerations. That tells me that there is a serious issue in western society regarding reproductive policy so it is only logical to look at where the control of that is.
Here are some things for you to consider. "The time to fix the roof is when the sun is shining" and "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable" both from JFK. The fundamental inequality in reproductive law against men and children is the driving factor here and it's not even possible to discuss it.
As for your unrelated comments about religion, I'm not particularly religious however you'd have to be a fool not to uncover the wisdom encoded there. It was the ancients that said "There will come a time where ignorance is celebrated as virtue and lies celebrated as truth", it looks like we are living those days.
Yes, for European ethnic groups. There's a reason for this too. Africans in US don't volunteer to being medically experimented on for historic reasons nearly as much as europeans.
It's a lesser version of a large problem we have with medicine being more poorly suited for women than men. Because women have a much lower risk tolerance, and so they don't volunteer for medical experiments of treatments and medications either.
Those who volunteer are the ones who medicines and treatments are optimized for, and who's medical problem patters end up as medical benchmarks.
I.e. "geriatric pregnancy starts at 35".
Dear retard. These women can't have children via fucking. That's the starting point of the tragedy.
"Oh shit, here we go again".
No, normal groups do it via conquest. This whole "suicidal sympathy" nonsense, where parts of elites within your own group intentionally genocide the lower classes through importation of foreign conquerors is a fairly rare phenomenon.
Last documented time it happened was when Roman Empire collapsed.
It's about both. Women are now indoctrinated to "wait until career is solid", i.e. their 30s.
For some ethnic groups, that's the age when they can't have children. For others, it's age where they have severe problems having children.
Biologically, women are primed to start having children in early to mid teens (easiest birth in terms of complications, but low viability of fetus and baby size making it suboptimal). Optimal window is where ease of birth is going down, but still very high up, while viability of fetus and baby size converge on optimal. That's between 16 and 22 (depending on ethnic group). Everything past that is reduction in all three, and the curve's downward trajectory rapidly accelerates when geriatric pregnancy stage starts, ending at zero marker (sterility).
Women are the carriers of culture, meaning they enforce the norms. That's their biological role in our species. So when the norm is "do not have children until you have a solid career, be a boss babe so you can provide best possible life for your children", they prioritize career and shame women who don't. And then when they finally get set in life, they try to have a child.
Find out that they're not getting pregnant. Get to a doctor. Get tested. Find out they're well into geriatric pregnancy range. Get scared, harvest eggs (far too late, you want to harvest eggs when you're in your early 20s at the latest if fertility is your goal, and even then success rate is not great). Do the first round of IVF. Nothing. Second. Nothing. Go to the doctor again, and get reminded that deep into geriatric pregnancy means that even with IVF, chances are low.
Get desperate, depressed, often borderline suicidal. "I've lived my life the way all other women told me I'm supposed to live it, and now I find out that it was all a lie, a weapon they deployed against me to prevent me from having children so theirs don't have to compete with mine?"
That realization is for top 20%. The rest just get depressed and don't understand why reality doesn't bend to their socialization. That's the stereotypical millenial woman in her late 30s and early 40s, doing all the drugs and all the alcohol and all the SSRIs to just drown away her misery, and then complain on tiktok about everything.
But a lot of women can still have that one child with IVF, as long as they start in their thirties, and they're not of african descent.
Genetic Men cannot have children and are basically slaves in this society
We are all slaves or potential slaves in this society. Don't be such a snowflake.
Woman's Choices in society:
1. Work
2. Stay at home and have children
Man's choice in society:
1. Work
2. Work
It's quite obvious when you simply look at reality for what it is. Don't be such a White Knight.
When was the last time we had a draft?
Vietnam as I recall 60,000 men died. Are you saying another 60,000 men should die just to make it relevant? Or have the laws changed, did I miss some landmark new laws that ended this practice?
Never mind, there's no having a rational conversation with you.
Alternatively your world view has a fragile basis in reality and you're too confronted by the idea that I may actually have a point.
I can't comment on your masculinity. I don't know you.
Exactly and since I don't have to put up with your shit the real question here is are you capable of a rational discussion?
But it seems like you're wounded, so let's cauterize it.
Yes, I am alive, I am male and I have suffered wounds, 42 physical and a confidential amount of emotional wounds that I have spent time processing and resolving. I grew up in a family of mostly women and got an up-close look at the dark and light side of female nature.
I saw how vicious mentally unstable women can be. I saw how nurturing mentally stable women were. I've saw callous bullying females going after the humble feminine females up close. I learned early that filtering crazy bitches out of my life led to peace and abundance.
That's why your rage bait seems so stupid and disappointing compared to some of the comments you make later. I regret to inform you that you too have been brainwashed.
In a very strange sense, it is true that males are disposable,
No man, woman or child's life is disposable. A consciousnesses right to existence is indisputable, unalienable basis of all human rights.
but this fact is built into sexual reproduction by evolution itself. In virtually all species,
In nature some females eat the males. If you are actually a human being capable of having/had children, you are displaying the very dark side of female nature I'm talking about by not engaging your rational mind to evolve your worldview simply because it is not convenient to acknowledge and overcome this part of female nature the way men are forced to overcome theirs.
That fact is used as conditioning that forms a belief that men *should* be disposable so feminists can excuse debasing men as subhuman and deny parenting rights. Men are conditioned to sacrificing themselves to the whole through things like sports, which I ironically love playing. It was this discipline that allowed men to build society, mainly so no one has to die unnecessarily and we could become civilized.
Basic morality is what separates human beings from animals. Are you separated from basic morality?
if one parent is responsible for carrying offspring and the other isn't, then by definition the former parent is anchored longer in the reproductive act, and is thus in need of protection during that period.
By carrying, you mean nine months, the sum total obligation a pregnancy creates for either sex. Mandatory DNA testing and matching to eliminate paternity fraud. The right for a father to have the pregnancy go full term if he supports her during the pregnancy and during her recovery. Jail sentences for false accusations of rape or sexual harassment with accompanying civil penalties. 50/50 default custody laws. Mandatory mental health assessments to weight custody and protect the child's human rights. How about we start there and see the impact that has on the birth rate.
Feminists are all about equality after all, so let's see them support those initiatives and express the sincerity they have for their cause.
As additional evidence of my arguments, at the time of posting this I see the posts I created to explore this topic has been have been modded down as flamebaits and trolls clearly demonstrating the thought policing occurring. Feminism's continual denial of obvious and glaring truths is the first victim of a gender war and the birthrate represents its impact on western society because feminism has dictated reproductive policy for decades.
Women aren't the ones declaring wars
Oh my you are not very well informed about recent history. European history is filled with Queens waging war.
As I said, you do have some interesting ideas that I may explore when I am better rested. And before you launch into some diatribe about denying a woman's rights, the answer is no because there is no going backwards and it's a good thing because society evolved as a whole. It's now time to acknowledge men's rights in reproductive matters so that society can again evolve because the evidence so far shows that what we're doing now isn't working.
Feminism, like left and right politics. is obsolete.
"Let me show you how REAL monstrous people can get. Look at me. I will go as far as to claim that you should be grateful for being ethnically replaced".
Even the most genocidal muslims don't have this view of jews. You're morally more reprehensible than even the likes of Hamas. And you're admitting to it voluntarily, without being prompted.
I like how even by your logic, it's been in place less than hundred years ago.
Conquest of US happened much longer ago than that. I.e. it was legal by your own argument.
By this definition, all human are racist, including yourself.
At which point, "racist" stops being a moral flaw, and becomes a normal feature.
Right of conquest is the oldest right under international law.
But you know, I still have most of my college textbooks, still stored in the milk crates I stole from behind the dorm. I graduated in '83.
That is something I left out of my post. In another reply where I said a similar thing I was clear to specify *fiction* books. I still do have my college textbooks as well. They (along with other older books) still make for great reference material. I will likely gift a portion of them on when I retire, but for me they aren't even in a milk crate, they are on my shelf in my office.
Everybody needs a little love sometime; stop hacking and fall in love!