Comment A quicker solution may be to (Score 1) 156
purchase the Cyc rule-base/engine and figure out how to integrate it with LLMs. It could then have a degree of common sense that LLMs lack.
purchase the Cyc rule-base/engine and figure out how to integrate it with LLMs. It could then have a degree of common sense that LLMs lack.
Tell me his rockets are not intentionally phallic.
Schrodinger Factor is real! Screw you flat-time-liners!
I'm going to eat your cat for claiming this.
Oh Holy FSM, we worship thee!
The aliens abducted Bill's meds. Not Bill's fault.
Has there ever been a sci-fi series where they were on the last season and the writers ended up explaining the end of everybody being from a ghastly mistake?
It's shaped like a giant KKK hat. Purely coincide, I assure you.
It will morph into Dark String Theory in 3...2...1...
TX: We have more data-centers than CommieFornia, neener neener! You're a bunch of `ZZZzzt *poof*
Wrong anatomy item that horny users want to crank up
No one is using well-known ports for anything legitimate that isn't the associated service. Anything spun up on e.g. 110 that isn't a POP server is going to inherently be questionable.
The Hegnet and Orangenet
The people who block ports pointlessly just because they've been abused in the ancient past are idiots too.
You'll want to amplify on this, because blocking a well-known port for an insecure protocol has no downsides. Nothing legitimate is going to be spun up on e.g. 110, why would you leave it open vs blocking it?
May all your PUSHes be POPped.