Comment Re: Why aim for shrinking Market share. (Score 5, Insightful) 381
Why is this marked insightful? Are even 1% of users spoofing their user agent string? Are 0.01%?
No, but it made the poster feel better about his personal biases.
Why is this marked insightful? Are even 1% of users spoofing their user agent string? Are 0.01%?
No, but it made the poster feel better about his personal biases.
Or there are a bunch of young boys living nearby.
Plaid.
I don't have a 5S - can it be easily shown that there are no fingerprints stored in it yet? If so, I'd think one could fairly convincingly demonstrate, using two people, that this exploit works.
I wondered that as well. It would have been more conclusive if he'd had a second person come in and use the fake to unlock the phone.
Yup - I have no argument at all with your statement.
I think the NSA believed it was okay to weaken cryptography because they assumed they would be the only one who knew about what they'd done and specifically how they'd weakened it.
So really, what I believe is they were very clever and, at the same time, very naive... Or perhaps sophomoric and arrogant would be a better fit.
An interesting scenario just came to mind...
1) RSA intentionally weakens their crypto at the behest of the NSA (this is fairly certain)
2) Chinese hack RSA - the only question is just how thoroughly (a known fact)
Now comes the speculation.
3) China analyzes what they got from RSA and discover the crypto is weaker than expected.
4) Quietly, China also begins to take advantage of this breakable crypto the NSA foisted on US companies and citizens.
5) China deduces why it was done and starts looking for weaknesses in other US crypto products - possibly succeeding, given they have a decent idea what to look for.
Followed by
6) China successfully and quietly penetrates most US defense contractors and financial institutions.
or put it another way, a simple switch on a nuclear bomb failed as it fell to earth, rendering it inoperable. doesn't inspire much confidence for when it is used in war.
Well, if you choose to ignore the fact that the US has successfully used two nuclear bombs in war...
Yeah, I went looking that setting pretty quickly because you're absolutely right - it went from "interesting" to "meh" to "how the heck do I disable that?" over the course of a couple hours.
It perhaps works better with their own wallpapers, but I use my own photos and it got annoying pretty quick.
(I think I've seen that movie...) What could possibly go wrong?
As long as the killbots have a preset kill limit, I think we'll be okay.
Given all the other contraptions the Professor managed to put together - do you really think a bicycle-powered electric razor was out of the question?
Works for me on a regular 4. You cannot launch new apps but previoulsy opened apps that are running are accessible.
When I tried it (on an iPhone 5), it does seem - as in the demo video - the apps have to have been opened very recently.
This seems to be related to how iOS 7 handles multitasking. I wonder if disabling background updating of apps would fix it? Later yesterday (after I played around trying to replicate this bug) I disabled background updating, mainly to try to address the poor battery life suckage iOS 7 seems to have introduced on my phone...
Turn in your geek card.
No, it just means he's at least 25 years old.
Do you know who else also breathed? Hitler. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
I only breathe in Gandhi fashion - if Hitler style is the only one available, I don't breathe.
"Luke, I'm yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser." -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"