Not all evidence is admissable in court. Evidence that is illegally obtainted can't be used in a prosecution. And any resulting evidence (like from a traffic stop as described in the article) is excluded as fruit of the poisoned tree
The underlying assumption that everyone seems to be making is that the original evidence was gathered illegally. That is often not the case. The concern the presentation is addressing is that entering the evidence into a court proceeding could compromise classified sources or methods. An alternate but valid evidence trail is then found that will hold up in court without compromising the classified details. That doesn't in any way imply that the original chain of evidence was gathered illegally.
Update 2: Yes, it's 7-bit Bell 202 ASCII. I tried decoding it as such earlier, but must have gotten the bit order wrong! So I just chose a roundabout way.
[In 2010] NASA already had spent $292 million on the A-3 structure. Since then, it's spent an additional $57 million to keep building it, according to a February 2013 report by the agency's inspector general, Paul Martin
Yeah, I ran into that eariler this week. The only thing that solved it was to delete all of my cache and cookies. Hasn't happened again.
Clear the browser's cache and cookies. It's the web 2.0 version of "Have you tried rebooting it?". If you haven't tried it yet, don't even call me.
And if you need personal or professional advise, there's no better place than Yahoo! Answers.
+1 ROFLMAO
So what? Editors are supposed to "edit".
GP claimed the typo was added by the editor. I was just pointing out that it was already there in the submission and the editor just failed to take it out, that's all.
If people who disagreed with the NSA were arrested, or lost their jobs, or were audited, or were deported, or disappeared in the middle of the night, we would know about it. Those things can't be kept secret.
The root post warns of the unstated repercussions of attending this "honeypot" conference. I want to know what those repercussions are.
You mean like when people who develop encrypted messaging systems or encrypted phone applications get added to watch lists and get harassed every time they enter the country even though they are citizens?
What good is a ticket to the good life, if you can't find the entrance?
