Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:No (Score 2) 388

I saw that, it doesn't provide a solution, the file is not in the latest git pull nor in the tarball download. If I was really ambitious I gues I could start downloading & searching prior tarballs, but that really should not have to be done. It would be nice to know what source files generate the library. I have a sneaking suspicion they have renamed, as they did with the "provision" command and the code/library is really there, just not with the name in the import statement. I went through all the names with 'kdc' in them and it was not intuitively obvious that any of them correlated with the policy library. I am not stupid and tried really hard to use other avenues to resolve the issue before p*ssing and moaning, I would imagine things will get better once they start making a .deb package. At this point, the only PPA's I could find were for the alpha releases, sigh. I am really surprised there are not yum/apt/etc nightly packages available. Automating the package release seems like a no-brainer for either the SAMBA or Ubuntu team.

Comment Re:No (Score 3, Interesting) 388

Not expecting a drop-in but I would like it to at least provision a domain or have some response on irc or the samba maing list as to why it fails. Having the wiki howto up to date would not be a bad idea either.
The wiki and most other online resources indicate the one should use the "provision" command. This command is no longer available in the S4RC you must use samba-tool to accomplish the task.
sudo samba-tool domain provision --realm=new.example.com --domain=NEWDOM --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --adminpass=badpass --server-role='domain controller'

Unfortunately, attempting to provision on a fresh Ubuntu 12.04 install with the following additional packages:
build-essentials python-software-properties build-essential libacl1-dev python-dev libldap2-dev pkg-config gdb libgnutls-dev libblkid-dev libreadline-dev libattr1-dev openssl (please note these pre-requisite are not documented in the wiki) gives the following error:
"libkdc-policy.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
and I cant get an answer as to where to find or build this module or find such info in a web search. All in all, it has been a very frustrating experience.
Iphone

Submission + - Anybody know of any other products like this?? (alphynind.com)

harveydent2 writes: This company Alphyn makes these jeans that have a flap specifically designed for an iphone. They're kinda expensive tho, so I was wondering if you guys knew of any other similar products?

They're called Delta 415s btw. They're cool jeans but like I said they're kinda pricey. I would get these in a second if they were a little cheaper...

Hardware

Submission + - Raspberry Pi revision 2.0 board announced (geek.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Raspberry Pi finally saw a release on February 29 this year and is thought to have sold 200,000 units, with a million expected to ship before the year is over. That’s a lot of tiny PCs, but it’s also been an opportunity for owners to feedback any problems or tweaks they’d like made to the board. The Raspberry Pi Foundation has taken the feedback on board and today announced a revised design is being put into production. The new Raspberry Pi, known as revision 2.0 PCB, is expected to start shipping in the next few weeks.

The revision includes a number of changes, but is essentially the same board. To summarize it includes a new reset circuit, a replacement for the reset fuses allowing for more reliable USB hub power, two GPIO pin changes for JTAG debug support, four redundant GPIO signals have been removed, and a new connector has been added for attaching a range of boards including a clock or audio codec. Two of the more easily noticeable changes include a fix that stops the HDMI connection interfering with certain operations of the Raspberry Pi, and the addition of two 2.5mm mounting holes to allow for easier mounting.

Comment Not suprised (Score 1) 109

I kinda enjoyed playing and was even willing to pay for the privilege.
I'd buy 60 day cards online at a discount and it brought the price down to under $13/month. Suddenly you couldn't get 60 day cards, only 30 day. So in addition to the higher price/day you had the additional PITA of manually updating your subscription every month. I stopped playing.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...