Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"Hate Speech" you say. (Score 1) 50

I find it hilarious how accurate my description of your behaviour was. Yup, accusations of looking into primary sources over spin doctors being a "conspiracy theory" immediately follow.

For a moment, you made me entertain trying to get you to also state that this is a threat to our democracy. That's usually the next mantra in your cult after the conspiracy theory one. But honestly, I just can't be bothered. If looking into primary sources is "suspect" and "a conspiracy theory", so be it. It's not like I'm going to convince a man of faith over the internet that his God is not real.

Comment Re:"Hate Speech" you say. (Score 1) 50

I have no specialist skills to reverse engineer the specific knowledge of software that he used from a sound clip. That would require extreme level of knowledge in field of generative audio models and comprehensive data analysis.

I'm not sure how that's relevant which specific generative model he used either. There are quite a few that are open to all.

Comment Re:"Hate Speech" you say. (Score 1) 50

This is my point. You don't care about what happened. If you did, you'd go to readily available primary sources.

Instead you decided to attack me for referencing primary sources, because spin doctors you're comfortable with didn't mention them. Essentially, your attack on me is an act of maintenance of your ideological bubble against the reality that is more than willing to stare you in the face. It just takes one search on the subject and going on from there.

But you're telling me, straight up with full honesty that you won't do that, because that is something that is associated with primordial horror and death for you. It's a reaction of a cultist sensing something that might damage his faith.

You can take the horse to the water. You can't make it drink. One look at the man's social media accounts and then listening to the AI generated speech will tell you exactly how BLM features into it. It's literally one search away. From where you'll probably quickly run into the local far left militant cells perpetrator successfully mobilized appealing to black lives mattering to attack the white principal.

But you won't do it. Because "ghosts", the feature of a primordial death and destruction awaits should you do that.

Comment Re:Right (Score 1) 18

There was a massive increase in demand for cloud services as well, because of all of the "masses working from home" novelty. So there would be a lot of demand for enterprise as well.

I suspect this is more of it being a long lead product. Or the story is just generally inaccurate on everything, since it also seems to imply that entire chatGPT training data set could fit on two hard drives, and yet that is somehow causing a shortage of hard drives.

Comment Re:"Hate Speech" you say. (Score 1) 50

Have you considered taking a look at accuser's social media profiles, instead of wondering why people who support BLM are being protective of a known BLM activist?

And then cross reference that with the contents of AI generated speeches to reach the self evident conclusion? Remember, you don't have to go to the spin doctors. You can just go to primary sources.

Comment Re:"Hate Speech" you say. (Score -1, Troll) 50

If you read the actual merits of the case, teacher was a far left nutjob who tried to get central left position holding principal fired in the name of the ideological disagreement.

I.e. this isn't a conflict between teacher and principal. This is a conflict within US left wing political movement, where progressive far left is trying to finalize subversion of many institutions, where older people still hold old school liberal politics in spite of younger rank and file being far left.

It's a power struggle between the last vestiges of left wing liberalism and the progressivism laying siege to them.

Comment Re:ByteDance Posturing (Score 1) 159

ByteDance left India in wake of similar legislation. That is a massive growth market with way more users.

Likely reason is that primary value of ByteDance is their massive recommendation algorithm superiority over everyone else. That is where almost all of their value comes from. Losing almost any single nation's market share pales in comparison to having to sell the algorithm to a foreign entity.

Comment Re:What they're really saying is... (Score 1) 159

More accurately, they do not want their algorithms copies by alphabet and meta. Youtube and Facebook/Instagram video recommendations are way, WAY worse than tiktok's. It's why tiktok won the short video war.

Youtube is hanging on the long video first mover advantage, where many long form video producers are dependent on higher revenues Youtube can offer. Youtube shorts are a meme for a reason.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...