Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Legislation... (Score 1) 239

Your question is self evidently loaded with "think of the children" guilt generation attempt.

So answer obviously hinges on "how much are we willing to sacrifice so that people like you feel less guilt when they think of the children".

The question I asked is actually THE answer to your question. But being someone who operates on totalized morality, you have problems grasping that.

Comment Re:Going to cause a lot of fender-benders (Score 1) 244

Except it doesn't. Insurance companies have looked at this and it has reduced the rate of claims overall (both major and minor) to the point where they were the ones lobbying the governments to mandate the feature.

AEB has been a common feature of cars for over a decade. Some car companies haven't produced a car for years which didn't have AEB. In the EU it's been mandated for 2 years already on new cars. Fender benders aren't increasing. There's no data to backup your claim.

Comment Re:Cost vs. benefit analysis (Score 1) 244

Stupid analysis. All cars already have 3 of the things you list (required by mandates for ABS), most cars already have the 4th (forward facing sensors for parking). Critically a majority of cars sold right now already have the AEB in the USA, and several manufacturers don't even offer models without it, so you can't add $1k (over estimated by a factor of at least 10 by you) to the number of cars on the road, but instead only the few models currently sold missing the feature.

Please don't ever use numbers again. They aren't your forte.

Comment Re:Not new, and very useful (Score 1) 244

I'm a better driver than the computer is

A statement said by all horrible drivers.

AEB is a mandated feature on all cause sold in Europe and has been for a couple of years. It was a feature of 25% of new cars sold over a decade ago meaning that right now there's more than 25% of cars on the road that has it.

It isn't causing accidents. It's actively preventing them. The data from literally everyone regardless of which country, regardless of whether it was government, university, or private (insurance companies), all agree it causes a net reduction in accidents.

Do everyone a favour and don't drive with a seatbelt. At least then you'll kill yourself and we won't need to deal with yet another idiot on the road who thinks they are better than the safety features of their car.

Comment Re:I prefer to be in charge of my vehicle's brakin (Score 1) 244

Good luck trying to maintain that distance in any realistic high way driving conditions. Above a certain car density, people will take that gap as an invitation and fill it in as fast as you can create it.

And? Back off a bit. If you're trying to keep close enough to prevent a car merging in front of your, you're not only driving dangerously, but you're also actively contributing to a jam in traffic caused by cars unable to merge freely.

Please stay in America, in many other countries you'll be very quickly pulled over and fined for your idea of highway driving.

Comment Re:I prefer to be in charge of my vehicle's brakin (Score 1) 244

That's partly the algorithm too, though. The speed sensitive cruise control systems should not permit you to choose a following distance which is so excessively close.

They don't. That is one of the chief complaints about adaptive cruise control systems by people - they leave too much of a gap causing other people to pull into the gap... you know... like you're supposed to.

IME, there is not enough road for all the cars which must use it at commute time to maintain a safe following distance.

Nope, that is horseshit. There's more than enough road. In fact when roads back up due to traffic one of the biggest reasons for it is that people aren't maintaining enough following distance to allow cars to merge freely. The more space you have between cars the faster you can safely move on the road in question which also means the higher the road capacity. Many cars moving slowly, or few cars moving quickly results in the same road capacity.

Comment Re:I prefer to be in charge of my vehicle's brakin (Score 1) 244

Something like 25% of cars have had AEB... 10 years ago based on a quick search which started showing results from 2014. It has been mandated for all new model cars in the EU for 2 years already (and starting this year, every new car sold regardless of when the model was designed). Several manufacturers already do not make a single model without AEB.

Comment Re:I prefer to be in charge of my vehicle's brakin (Score 1) 244

Nags at me when it thinks I'm not slowing down fast enough at the car in front of me.
  Nags at me when it thinks I'm too close to the car in front of me.
I can disable it but it re-enables itself every time I start the car.
Another car cuts in front of me - whoops - EBS time!
When I put foil in front of the sensor, it disables the EBS after a while, THEN disables my Cruise Control. Thanks!

You are not talking about AEB. You're talking about a driver assist feature that keeps a following distance. Most people will drive having never had AEB activate. AEB slams on the brakes very hard at the last minute and is a feature of cars even without cruise control or following assist. Also when AEB comes on you will get a big warning flash up in your car that it activated.

You're like a person who had a common cold confusing it with influenza. If you've had the latter you would recognize how silly it is comparing it to the former.

Comment Re:Clearly fiction (Score 1) 132

Black Lives Matter insists that America invented and perfected slavery

No they don't. They just insist that Americans invented and perfected black slavery in America. Why do they not acknowledge European slavery? To answer that ask yourself why would BLM give a flying fuck about what happened in Greece 2000 years ago which is completely and utterly irrelevant to slavery in America?

Comment Re:You mean just like Ubisoft (Score 1) 85

No not like Ubisoft. Ubisoft do not let you buy and play a game for hundreds of hours only to force you to link the account several months later. The deal was known up front, from the first time you launched the game (and critically within the refund window).

Also Ubisoft accounts are generally widely available. Steam just pulled this game from 170 countries due to the game no longer being playable there due to lack of PSN access.

Comment Re:Big Whoop (Score 1) 85

Apparently the requirement has been on the Steam page for a long time.

No it was not listed as a requirement. Steam lists on the page all accounts linkable for any game. A requirement is shown with a dedicated special warning on the right pane with a yellow highlight, an optional account doesn't show the yellow highlight.

But in any case, one of my points has been handled by Valve playing the socially responsible group. They are ignoring all refund restrictions. They have pulled the game from 170 countries where PSN isn't available and are offering refunds beyond the normal 2h play restriction.

Slashdot Top Deals

Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots.

Working...