Laptop Pentium IIIs 124
jued0001 writes "A new Pentium III for Laptops running at 600 Mghtz is being released. Once called "Geyserville," now known as SpeedStep, it runs at 600 Mgthz when running on AC, but drops to 450 Mghtz when running on a battery. "
Kind of cool (Score:2)
Bad Mojo (Score:1)
--
Wow, innovative (Score:1)
#define X(x,y) x##y
Geyserville? (Score:2)
By the way (Score:1)
doh! double post :( appologies... (Score:1)
#define X(x,y) x##y
Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:4)
I believe that this is the reason that the heat-sensitive fan on my laptop stays off when running Linux, but goes on with Windows.
pricing? (Score:1)
I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:5)
I'd be quite happy with a 400mhz laptop with good *connectivity* options - if someone came out with a P2/400 that was fairly simple in the performance ratio department, but had 128k radio connectivity within a 4 to 6 mile radius back to a home base unit I could put on my network, I'd be in total geek heaven.
I don't understand why this isn't more of an issue for people these days - I guess in a nation of commuters (I walk to work every day), this is not as important as having the 'latest and greatest processor' to cart back and forth, but I'm hoping that in the coming year or so we'll start to see more innovation in the WAN department for portable computer users than we will in processor designs...
In fact, if laptops *DEVOLVED* into simple video/screen/mouse interfaces with extremely good spread spectrum radio connectivity back to a home base unit that could be connected to a Monster P3/1Ghz system, that would be *ideal*.
Why bother engineering to take all that luggage with you, when we could just engineer to leave the luggage at home and just take a
These new wireless WedPad type devices are more and more becoming an attractive occupation of time and geek attention, in my book... They'll surely evolve to something closely approximating what I described above. Hopefully, anyway.
What about Linux jiffies? (Score:1)
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:1)
BogoMIPS effects? (Score:1)
It is a nice feature (from experience) (Score:2)
I get to keep working for an hour longer on a single battery. And this does bring up one more note on this, whenevery you think about the battery life figures now, remember that they are baseing this on the most power-conserving settings...
Why does the type of power source matter? (Score:2)
What a lousy story (Score:1)
New processor models (Score:2)
Ooooh, the new Geezerite processor. sounds like what geologists will find when excavating the Intel prefab plant about 3 millenia from now with nanobots. "Wow, it's unbelievable - they actually used *silicon* to power their computers!"
Has this instability been actually documented? (Score:2)
Re:I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:1)
void recursion (void)
{
recursion();
}
while(1) printf ("infinite loop");
if (true) printf ("Stupid sig quote");
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:1)
It's not the first Laptop to do this as far as I'm aware, I know many Toshiba laptops will do this with a special setting using the Fn (blue) hot keys or a third mode (the best i think) that runs at full speed and runs the fan based on a thermostat. They also implement other things like reduced power to the screen, causing less brightness but more battery life, and being more careful about spinning down HDs and cdroms which are idle. That being said, i'm not sure I want a processor that forces this on me as opposed to letting me choose, does anyone know which this does?
Looking to get a new laptop soon for college...stuyman
Re:I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:1)
Also, what would these idealized communications network you wish for cost? It sounds like it would be like a cellphone, but with much higher bandwidth. Who's going to pay for the new infrastructure for that?
Batteries my friend (Score:1)
The airwaves have too little bandwidth available (Score:2)
A better solution would be short-range base units scattered 200 feet apart in all civilized areas (perhaps on top of all light posts) that have a fibre connection to the internet. Thus lower-power radios can be used, and since there would be only at max 200 notebooks in a 200 foot radius to one of these stations, there would be plenty of bandwidth for all! Then you would just securely VNC into your home computer for all the juicy processing tasks you need to do...
CPU Speed Throttling? (Score:1)
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:1)
Can't wait for Mozilla and/or Opera to come out.
So... (Score:2)
Re:What about Linux jiffies? (Score:1)
--
Laptops should not be treated like desktops... (Score:2)
the *interface* to the laptop, what you use to work with it, the keyboard, the screen, the mouse/equivalent, are all components that suffer through miniaturisation, due to their having to interface with our eyes and hands. small, unresponsive keyboards (still using the unwieldy qwerty layout! a disaster, sizewise), poor substitutions for the mouse, and a small screen, all hinder its usage.
coding on it is passable, non-type-intensive applications are better, but anything demanding accurate mouse-control is difficult, graphic design nigh-on impossible. the laptop should not be performing any of these tasks though - by implication, the environment it should be used in is quite unsuitable to these sorts of developments - it should be used on the move.
on the train/bus/etc while commuting, in a restaurant on a lunch break, so on and so forth - a non-work environment. as such it should be used primarily for supplemental tasks... anything from catching up on email to reading documents, filing things, noting down ideas, and so on and so on.. work that can then consolidate the work on the regular computer.
this is probably what has lead to the increasing popularity of palmtop computers - they offer a similar range of functions as detailed above, but are all the more portable. people are finding laptops unwieldy for anything more. it is likely people could make more use of a portable computer than they can get from a palmtop, but in its current incarnation, the laptop is unable to fulfil this role to any great extent.
ideally, the ultimate goal would be to produce a "portable computer" (i refrain from using the term laptop here) whose interface system is not an adaptation of the desktop computer's, but rather one made for the job, ie working on the move. speculation here could end up in the fantastic, but the technology, from voice-activated commands through eye-tracking pointers to thought-control, can't be too many years away.
Fross
Re:CPU Speed Throttling? (Score:1)
I use every MHz they clock these puppies up to, and I like this new function because it will accomplish a lot, believe it or not.
Power consumption is reduced a great deal by shifting down the voltage, and a lot of battery life is added by the power down.
Having worked quite a bit with these new FC-PGA pIII's, I can tell you that from 400-600MHz the productivity scales very well.
Re:What about Linux jiffies? (Score:2)
My haiku comment is deep.
Won't be minus one.
Well, if Apple are doing it... (Score:4)
http://www.apple.com/ibook/airport.html
Won't be long before this becomes a commodity in the PC market, and when that happens, as all new technologies that enter the PC realm, it'll become faster, cheaper, lighter, and more and more powerful within a very short period of time...
So
:)
Re:I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:2)
Now what we really need is... (Score:2)
Re:What about Linux jiffies? (Score:1)
Re:I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:2)
My question is why would you want to leave it at home?
I have a P2/400 Laptop and want it to replace [sinasohn.com] my existing 486DX2-66 [sinasohn.com]. My laptop is my main machine; any non-portables I have are pretty much single task machines. (There's the web browser in the bedroom (IMDB!), the Quicken machine, the web browser/MP3 player at my desk, etc.) If it's important, it goes on the laptop, and it goes with me.
When I travel, I don't have to rely on some hotel's idea of a decent machine (win95/98), or what's available at a client site (not my files). My commute time turns into productive time. I can take my system, configured the way it should be, and set up in advance to demos and meetings.
Four to six miles might be adequate for some people, but it simply wouldn't work for me.
Re: Laptops should not be treated like desktops... (Score:1)
A laptop is my desktop.
Computing power is cheaper than bandwidth. Until that changes, I want the most powerful laptop I can afford.
I've got a 400mHz IBM Thinkpad 600E with all the bells and whistles. It docks into a wonderful base station which gives me access to a 21" monitor and an ergo keyboard. When docked, it might as well be a desktop.
When undocked, I've got all the power of a desktop but in an easy to carry package. But most importantly, I've got the bulk of my data close (seven gig of it anyway). And that, my friends, is why laptops rock.
If I could trade CPU cycles for bandwidth, I would. The best laptop I ever owned was a Tandy 100. It was light, ran on double-A batteries and was more reliable than a tank (the 100 still boots, unlike the four laptops I've since owned).
At the time I was using the TRS-80, bandwidth was less expensive than power or storage so it made sense to use the 100 as a dumb terminal to the data center.
Times have changed. Now bandwidth is much more expensive than CPU cycles and disk space. So it makes sense to keep the data close.
Should the pendulum swing back the other direction, I suspect I'll be working from a Palm Pilot.
InitZero
Re:Batteries my friend (Score:1)
Will this NC drivel ever stop? (Score:1)
I want a freaking fast portable computer!!!
Bigger pipes? Yippy for that too!! I love it. But I'm sick and tired of people telling me that the future will find me slowly circling the mother ship like some kind of semi-concious droid.
Simple physics: things which are closer together can communicate faster. No NC will *ever* match what a stand alone device can muster.
Ever notice how the people who sell NC's the hardest also sell servers? And also want to run the servers?
The NC is just a modern version of central planning. Don't be fooled. Do things your way, not someone else's.
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:1)
Come to think of it, I wonder how much advantage there is. I mean, say I want to do X numbers of computations. If I slow down the processor speed I decrease the number of computations per second, but I increase the number of seconds per battery. I suppose they aren't related the same (probably battery life is increased much faster than computations are decreased, but I have no idea if that's true).
Just my 2c
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops... (Score:2)
My six-year-old laptop has a full size keyboard, as does my new one. Among the well over 150 portable computers [sinasohn.com] I own, there are indeed some with very substandard screens, keyboards, etc. There are some with even worse features, though. You pick whats important to you when you pay your money.
My laptops work great in those situations, but I am not limited to "supplemental tasks" -- because my laptop is my main computer, I am fully functional where ever I might be. I don't have to worry about jotting down notes to update something later, I can update it right then and there. Heck, with my wireless modem [ricochet.net], I can update a web page, upload it, and view it off the net without leaving the coffee shop.
When I get somewhere where I work a lot (such as my home office, or my main client,) I plug into a docking station connected to a MS Natural Keyboard, a Logitech Trackman Marble, and a 17 inch monitor. For trips, I have a bag packed and ready to go with a network card, serial card, another trackman, a ballpoint mouse, and various keyboard and monitor cables.
The point is, where ever I am, I don't have to sacrifice. I have the best of all worlds, instead of sacrificing for a good machine some of the time!
Again, I think you are flat out wrong. Perhaps you find them unwieldy, but from what I've seen, laptops are replacing desktops in the corporate world left, right, and center. Fifteen years ago, I was about the only person I knew who owned a portable computer. Today, it doesn't surprise me to see two or more other people on the train with me working on a notebook -- at 9pm, going against the commute.
I have no problem carrying a large laptop -- it beats driving somewhere to walk on a treadmill the way people do -- but there are smaller, lighter ones that still have full-sized keyboards and screens.
Of course, portable computers aren't for everyone. My wife doesn't use hers anywhere nearly as often as I think she should. But for an awful lot of people, they are the future.
Re:So... (Score:2)
What you missed is the way laptops are used. On the bus/train, you're running on battery power, so it would switch to low speed to save battery life. When you get to the office, you would plug it in, probably to a docking station/port replicator (with attached keyboard/mouse/monitor), and use it with AC for high speed. When you travel, you bring along the power supply, and maybe an external mouse or keyboard. When you get there, you borrow someone's monitor/kb/mouse and do your work at high speed. On the plane home, you're back to low speed and the built-in kb/mouse/screen.
So, it is a full-blown, high-speed, ergonomic system at home/work/etc., and a normal-speed laptop on the bus/at the restaurant, etc.
Re:Rah, laptops! (Score:3)
Wanna place a bet on that? Portable computers have been around for over 25 years [sinasohn.com] -- I don't think they're going anywhere anytime soon. In fact, my experience has been just the opposite -- they are replacing desktops like crazy.
Well, not everyone does 3-D rendering all day; you might be surprised to find that 90% of the population can get by just fine with a 450mhz processor. Meanwhile, portability -- being able to work where ever, whenever you want -- is far more important than cutting a few milliseconds off that spell check.
As for cost, the relative price of a laptop to its comparable desktop counterpart is much closer than it was 10 years ago, and it continues to drop. In a few years, the price will be very nearly the same (but your desktop computer will come with an LCD screen.)
Wander down to the airport some time and check out how many folks you see waiting for flights with their laptops out. Take the bus some time during the rush hour and look around. Have lunch in Palo Alto or Mountain View and see what's on the menu. Heck, take a look in a CompUSA ad some Sunday and count the number of laptops versus desktops shown! I think you'll find that laptops are definitely not disappearing.
Re: Laptops should not be treated like desktops... (Score:1)
a) laptops easily become as good as a desktop system when placed in a docking station
(for obvious reasons. it's just something i didnt cover in my original post), and
b) the portability of data is the single most important aspect thereof, next to its accessibility en route.
however, these reasons seem to be more of using a laptop as a computer to transport between two working environments, not one to be used anywhere, which is in my mind what portable computing really should be.
i have to say my opinions are (as everyone else's) based on personal experience - the sort of work i do is simply unsuitable for laptops - programming (running something like symantec cafe on a 1-year old typical spec laptop is *not* fun!) and graphic design (where the lack of a sizeable display and good input device makes it nigh-on impossible) - as a result, i can't get much more usefulness from the laptop as i can something like a palmtop, which covers much the same ground on the lower-end of things.
i can understand if someone wants to tap out something under Office, or access large amounts of data en-route, then a laptop is the only option, i simply don't think it's a good enough solution for a number of applications, unfortunately most of the ones i use!
Fross
I'm sorry, but I just /have/ to ask... (Score:3)
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:3)
As it happens, I have an Ultralight portable. External battery packs appear to be quite popular with them. I have a bit of info and some photos at my "drop tanks [geocities.com]" page. I have been able to pull off 8 hours on battery power, but I wasn't actually doing much. If I'm using the external CD drive to rip and compress MP3s, for example, then battery life halves.
Anyway, haven't Powerbooks been able to do this forever? wasn't it called "clock cycling" or somthing...
Bye Bye Bogomips (Score:1)
Matthew
Battery Life (Score:2)
the battery life.
In fact, everything else being equal (ram and disk capacity for instance), I'd really enjoy something like a P200 with a much improved battery life. 2-4 hours doesn't cut it. Give me 72 hours on a charge!!
Geyserville New Instruction(s) (Score:1)
The PAUSE instruction has been added to the cacheability support group of instructions.
The execution of the next instruction is delayed an implementation specific amount of time. The instruction does not modify the architectural state. This instruction provides especially significant performance gain.
The PAUSE instruction is used in spin-wait loops with the processors implementing dynamic execution (especially out-of-order execution), or dynamic power throttling. In the spin-wait loop, PAUSE improves the speed at which the code detects the release of the lock. For dynamic scheduling, the PAUSE instruction reduces the penalty of exiting from the spin-loop. For dynamic power throttling, PAUSE in the spin-wait loop significantly reduces power consumption and prevents throttling.
Since the PAUSE instruction is backward compatible with ALL existing IA32 processor generations, a test for processor type (a CPUID test) is not needed. All legacy processors will execute PAUSE as a NOP, but in processors which use the PAUSE as a hint there can be significant performance benefit.
Re:Blah, laptops. (Score:1)
hardly an innovation. (Score:1)
My RC car plugs right into the wall! (Score:2)
Lame. (Score:1)
Also, you seem very fascinated with the use-less-power-on-battery feature. When I ran a story on the Geyserville on my site PBZone.com, I got a flood of reader mail reminding me that Macs have been doing that since the Duos, so about five-six years, possibly longer.
Feel the power of the Anonymous Coward! (Score:1)
Now, if only I could get an Anonymous Coward to power my PC.
Re:I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:1)
don't you know that the new 600Mhz Intel p3 will make your net access go faster?
seriously though.. i think the increasing laptop speeds are not by any means driven by consumers.. its simply a Mhz war to be "on top" just like with the desktop market. For years the 166mmx was fine in laptops, then along comes AMD with the mobile K6 and we are up to 600Mhz in the space of about 9 months..
smash
Re:BFD. Just disable the power saving crap. (Score:1)
--
Re:Geyserville? (Score:1)
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:1)
Re:Mghtz (Score:1)
Re:BogoMIPS effects? (Score:1)
Re:I have a P3/500 ...stop cancerous radio waves.. (Score:1)
Come-on people, come to grips, vote for safer technologies. Don't be just lured by just walking around with your laptop and boasting of mobility. Stop this wire-less every-where mania. Use it as a scrace resource and make this world a better place...
--
Your-well-wisher!
Re:Irrelevant for Linux? (Score:2)
Re:Kind of cool (Score:2)
Mike van Lammeren
Re:Well, if Apple are doing it... (Score:1)
That darn Apple!
Mike van Lammeren
Re:My RC car plugs right into the wall! (Score:2)
Marketing (Score:1)
Of course it makes a difference, you get the same amount of work done, but it takes longer. Therefore the company can hype longer batterylife, which will make more people buy the product.
Basicly equivelent to working slow because you charge by the hour. Dishonest perhaps, but if it makes a buck go for it!
Re:This moderator is an idiot.. THIS is interestin (Score:1)
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux? (Score:1)
Re:It is a nice feature (from experience) (Score:1)
Re:Batteries my friend (Score:1)
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux? (Score:2)
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux? (Score:1)
I think Gateway Solo computers are an excellent choice, and yes I worked with them. Sorry, I am not that fond of Dell Latitude, but maybe it's just me, I have over 500 of them here
The ideal way is to buy something about 2 steps below state of the art. It's usually considerably cheaper and just as good.
In reality, that ultra-high P3 power is simply not necessary. Unless you wanna do video editing (for which Sony VAIO would be ideal) on the fly, don't bother getting monster laptop.
I wouldn't suggest a low-end "consumer" laptop such as Compaq Presario, those are just plain unfit for the job.
If OS or computer system is not an issue, demo an iBook. Put Linux on it and enjoy the envious looks. I certainly want one, once they drop in price a bit, and I've never owned a Mac. Oh, and it has wireless networking capability by design.
Shop around, and do not get excess power. Do you really need that 8gb hdd in your laptop? I have one in my desktop and it's very heavily used and not nearly full, with 5 operating systems.
Remember that the more power - the more your battery will be drained. Sure the Vaios are supersleek, but their battery life is quite limited.
The screen size is a major issue... The 15" monsters do weigh a ton. I find 14" to be quite satisfactory, considering that I get near 100% viewable area. 13.3" used to be standard and they fit in economy class air flights, 14" will have harder time
Before you purchase a laptop, read a lot of information, especially their support forums.
A little checklist
CPU - above 200mhz
Ram - 64mb
HDD - = 4gb
USB - for wintel boxes if you plan to use Win 9x or Win 2000 Professional
Winmodem - just say "No" to that garbage and get a normal 3com Megahertz 56K, perhaps with cellular capability.
Upgradability - you don't upgrade a laptop except for hard disk which is removable and ram. Usually everything else is wired in.
DVD-Rom - optional, but you might want it. I want one
Compatibility - check for Linux support of the components prior to purchase. 90% of the time everything is already supported unless you purchase some utter junk.
Finally, it's been a while since I purchased a laptop, but I had to do quite a bit of research before recommending one.
My e-mail address is valid, should you have any further questions.
--
Leonid S. Knyshov
Network Administrator
Re:Why are cool batteries not avail for gen purpos (Score:1)
I have a Sprint PCS Denso touchpoint. The battery is 2x3 and less than quarter of an inch thick. 130 hours standby time!
I think the xx90 series from Nokia are also using LiON because their standby is about 5 days as well and they are very slim.
FWIW I have NiMH batteries for my personal electronics
--
Leonid S. Knyshov
Network Administrator
Re:I have a P3/500 in my laptop already... (Score:1)
--
Leonid S. Knyshov
Network Administrator
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux! (Score:2)
That's what I did 6 years ago. Six years was stretching it a bit, but you get the idea. My new laptop [sinasohn.com] will hopefully last a while as well.
Personally, I would recommend focussing on (in order of importance):
Well, I went for a ChemBook 7400 [chemusa.com] which is one of the laptops that Linux Laptops [linuxlaptops.com] used to sell. (Unfortunately, they stopped taking orders before I got mine.) There is also a page on running Linux on an ASUS 7400 [uunet.be] (which is the OEM version of the ChemBook). For more general info, check out the Linux Laptop page [utexas.edu].
Re:Mghtz (Score:1)
Re:Does executing halt instr still save power? (Score:2)
My laptop consumes 33 watts at full throttle, but consumes about 12 watts throttling the HALT instruction due to other electronics. You can watch how much your laptop consumes by splicing an ammeter and voltmeter from the power supply. Power in watts is voltage multiplied by current.
If you have the wattage, you can express this as kilowatt hours and calculate the cost of running your laptop each month for nonstop use. Its usually 8 cents per kilowatt hour or 2 cents for the industrial rates. Running my laptop while chewing on CSC keys [distributed.net] in the background cost me $1.90 a month.
Re:Kind of cool (Score:1)
In the age of super boredom, hype and mediocrity, celebrate relentlessness, menace to society. KMFDM
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux! (Score:1)
Re:Now what we really need is... (Score:2)
It watches your % CPU use and throttles the CPU accordingly.
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux! (Score:2)
One thing I didn't mention was that with laptops, getting a good vendor is a little more important than with a desktop. If your video card (for example) goes bad on a desktop, you can chuck it and get a new one. Not so with a laptop. That's why I paid a little more for the Chembook name, rather than getting the ASUS version cheaper from some no-name little dealer.
512MB RAM seems like it's way more than anyone could ever need, but I seem to remember people saying that about 64K not too long ago... 8^) Same goes for disk space. In theory, though, disk space should only be limited by available drives -- is there an actual BIOS limit or something at 75GB?
A 15" monitor sounds dreamy, but be sure it's something you want to haul around. I'm 6', 280lbs, and use to carry one of those 40lb suitcase compaq-types, so it wouldn't bother me, but it's probably bigger than my wife. YMMV.
The touchpad is important, but 90% of the time my hands are on the keyboard (I do COBOL programming mostly) and most of the rest of the time I use an external Trackman Marble. My mobile work is mostly typing (web pages, journal, e-mail, etc.) so the keyboard is far more important to me.
Check out the compatibility of the components -- video card, etc. I've not loaded Linux on my new one yet (where are those damn CD's?) but one of the reasons I picked this model was because of the Linux support available.
I've had it running under MS-DOS/Win3.11, Win98, GEM/TOS (Atari ST), and the MacOS. I'm sure I could use it with Linux if I had the time. I know of others who have used it with handhelds as well.
Basically, it's a hayes-compatible modem with a funny dialing string. The only problem I ever had was my Win3 dialer that didn't think "777**ppp" was a valid phone number. Note that for an extra $5/month, you can prepend a 9 and dial any landline modem. (I use this all the time to dial into client sites.) Check out some of my experiences [sinasohn.com] with it.
There are other, similar services, but most of them don't seem as simple or as well thought out as Ricochet. Check to see if a University in your area has coverage: I was travelling through Oregon one time and was surprised to get a signal. Turned out the hotel was right next to the Univ/OR which was wired for ricochet.
Failing that, get a bunch of your friends to send inquiries in the hope that there's enough potential business in your area to get them to set up a network.
I will have mine, btw, forever. When I die, there'll be a little antenna sticking up out of the ground by my headstone -- that'll be my Ricochet modem so I can update my web page from the other side... 8^)
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux! (Score:2)
The 15.4" screen runs at 1280x1024 (or something) which is probably higher than I would want to run it (I like 1024x768, but I could probably be convinced otherwise.) Laptop screens usually can't switch to a lower resolution -- it's a function of the hardware. Check out that screen in person before you buy! The same goes for the keyboard and mouse!
On a desktop, you can toss the keyboard/mouse/monitor and get yourself a nice MS Natural KB (one of the MS products I like, but they didn't invent it!), a Logitech Trackman Marble, and an 17"/19" NEC or MAG monitor (or whatever you fancy), but it's not so easy with a laptop on the road. You also have to weigh how much you'll be using it on the road versus at a desk where you can use an external KB/mouse/monitor.
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux! (Score:1)
Re:Laptops should REPLACE desktops...with Linux! (Score:2)
I know they have WashDC covered. I'm surprised they're not working on Boston, actually. Keep an eye on them, and let 'em know you're interested and they may show up in your area.
Sorry, I was being unclear. The $5/mo goes to ricochet so you can use the ricochet modem to call regular modems. That is, you can sit in the park with your laptop and ricochet modem and dial into any modem-equipped system, such as a BBS, internal network, or mainframe/minicomputer. The $5 covers their cost of an outgoing line, basically.
Aw, shucks. I'd settle for one of those Inspirons... 8^)