Andreesen No Longer AOL CTO 103
j_hylton writes "Reuters reports that Marc Andreessen is stepping
dow as CTO of AOL. See the report at
The Washington Post (and surely elsewhere).
Sun's chief strategist will replace him, which is another sign of the growing cooperation between the two companies." The story says, "Andreessen will shift to become a part-time strategic advisor focused on boosting the Dulles, Va.-based company's investment activities."
Whos Idea was this (Score:2)
I always wondered what kind of fit the Netscape ubergeek would be at AOL--it seemed somehow out of place, like if Linus Torvalds were to go work at Microsoft (well, maybe not THAT out of place--but you get my drift)
What has Andreeson really done? (Score:1)
Musical chairs (Score:2)
The last two weeks of managment shuffles have looked like a soap opera. SGI to MS, Sun to AOL, AOL to, er, wherever... Is it possible that all of these executives changing positions all at once could put enough stress on the San Andreas to finally trigger "The Big One?" Maybe we should get a map out, find the headquarters of these companies, and calculate the torques?
Being briefly serious, does anyone think this might bode ill for Mozilla?
A Magic Crystal Ball... (Score:2)
Is this a lateral movement, intended to just shift resources to a new area, or is this a demotion of sorts? (I can't hardly imagine it as a promotion...) Or is this Marc just starting to let up a little and enjoy a few of his millions? (part time position was mentioned)
Sometimes it's so hard to see through the market-speek!
Does it sounds like the death bell for Netscape? (Score:2)
Then again, does AOL have an interest in seeing Microsoft's power weakened? I wonder what ties AOL has with Microsoft now. As far as I know IE is still their default browser. And then again AIM is still installed over ICQ.
I'm actually looking forward to the next major version of AOL - as it should contain software for my mother that I would be proud to run. AOL can only lose if they fail to produce their product fast enough. But isn't that just sad? It's a good thing that Netscape is open-sourced because it's main pressure is no longer timely releases - but excellent software.
Joseph Elwell.
All in the corporate plan... (Score:1)
I'll bet Andreessen is happy about it though. How fun could it possibly be to spend your days politic-ing with the AOL execs? I'd much rather be scouring Silicon Valley for the Next Big Thing too....
--Mid
Andreessen to devote time to Merriwood (Score:1)
Raise your hand if... (Score:1)
You are surprised by this.
What? No hands showing?
Jack
Re:Andreesen's Homecoming... (Score:1)
Re:What has Andreeson really done? (Score:2)
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:44025499&d
What did he do anyway?? (Score:1)
I think this is probably the last we will hear of him for a long time. Like others, I really hope he stashed away his millions so he can live well. His position in history is solid and we all owe him some thanks, I guess, for being part of "Netscape-The early years."
Let's be honest. Does anyone here believe Andreeson and Steve case are equals? Not even remotely close.
THE END
Re:Does it sounds like the death bell for Netscape (Score:2)
With that being said, I am in no way putting down their products - they are excellent (IMHO). I merely stating my interpretation on how Sun feels about Linux.
Re:Andreesen's Homecoming... (Score:1)
Not much, i think.... (Score:1)
No, I can't spell!
-"Run to that wall until I tell you to stop"
(tagadum,tagadum,tagadum
-"stop...."
AOL might have cut this deal at merger time (Score:5)
So, what they did was negotiated a deal where Barksdale would go almost immediately but stay on the Board of Directors, and Andreesen would stay for indefinitely in a fairly nebulous but senior role.
Now, sufficient time has passed where this is no longer on the public's RADAR screen. Sure, some will be interested, but most people won't see this as a big deal. After all, to the typical consumer, not much has changed. http://home.netscape.com/ [netscape.com] is still there.
With respect to us (slashdot fans), many of us hadn't liked Netscape for a while anyway. We always suspected that Mozilla didn't have as much support as we would have liked. But, AOL hasn't actually killed it either.
I hope it doesn't make people mad to hear this (or to hear it again), but the AOL-Sun-Netscape deal wasn't about the browser anyway. Everyone knows that Micros~1 killed that market a while ago.
This was always about the servers -- not the SuiteSpot which are Netscape's basic server products. This is about the Xpert server series: PublishingXpert, CommerceXpert, etc. These are the Web-based workflow automation products that Netscape developed in a joint-venture with General Electric's EDI business. These are pound-for-pound the most valuable things that Netscape ever developed, from a commercial perspective.
So, if I am right in this analysis, I think that AOL, Sun, and the Netscape shareholders are getting what they wanted out of this deal. We shall see if it truly works to the competitive advantage of them all.
Re:What has Andreeson really done? (Score:1)
Re:Who cares? (Score:1)
washingtonpost.com flooded? (Score:2)
Gee willakers! How come every site that gets a /. link goes the way of windows2000.com? i understand about segfault a few days ago, but the army and now the washingtonpost have gotten it. seems like these sites should be prepared for some high-volume traffic...
plus, are we /.ers really lemming enough to all follow the same link? It's an AP story; there's a copy at CNNfn [cnnfn.com] and a copy at abcnews [go.com], too...
Better (Score:1)
However
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Belgium HyperBanner
http://belgium.hyperbanner.net
Re:Does it sounds like the death bell for Netscape (Score:1)
Besides that, AOL is already using Solaris.. why would they want to switch? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it..."
-s, solaris and linux user.
There was a Vanity Fair piece... (Score:1)
Re:Read my lips (Score:1)
Re:Musical chairs (Score:1)
Marc's move is... (Score:1)
GQ (Score:1)
LJS
News flash... (Score:5)
By Paige Turner
AP Technology Writer
Friday, September 10, 1999; 2:20 p.m. EDT
SAN JOSE, Calif. - America Online Inc. announced a shakeup today in its management ranks, announcing its intention to move figurehead Marc Andreessen, its visionary technology totem, into a glass case in the lobby.
AOL said in a statement from its Dulles, Va., headquarters that Andreessen, who has been founding Netscape professionally since 1994, would be more comfortable in his new location.
"Marc has expressed dissatisfaction with his ceremonial perch over the entrance to our boardroom," said AOL chief executive Steve Case. "We expect with this move we will be able to better serve Marc's career needs, such food, defecation, and petting."
AOL executives insist things have not changed substantially and that morale remains high.
"Marc is much happier in his new felt-lined glass enclosure," stated one handler. He is also on more prominent display here on the lobby, so that he can continue to inspire us all. Regrettably, the construction of Marc's cage renders him unable to make statements of a public nature."
Andreeson was not immediately available for comment. However, he was observed to write with blood on the interior of his cage the words, "Steve Case agrees with me that technology should be free. As a first step, I have recommended eliminating AOL's monthly ISP fees on a trial basis." Handlers covered Andreeson's box with a blanket soon afterwards.
Netscape, best known for its logo, is a leading provider of software and services for online businesses and the operator of NetCenter, a popular entry point to the World Wide Web. AOL is the largest Internet access provider and online service.
-konstant
"marca loves gotos" (Score:5)
"I put this goto here to make marca happy. marc loves gotos."
It just made my day. Sadly, I haven't been able to find it again since then.
Re:What has Andreeson really done? (Score:2)
Beginning of the AOL desktop (Score:1)
Off Topic "moderation error" (Score:2)
I am sorry again.
Ken
Off Topic "moderation error" NO PROBLEM! (Score:1)
Ken
Re:"marca loves gotos" (Score:3)
if(x == LASTCHAR) goto thats_it;
else ++x;
}
thats_it:
exit (0);
Re:Off Topic "moderation error" NO PROBLEM! (Score:1)
With all the changes to the moderation system, it might be wise to let people adjust their moderations within one hour. I know this is yet another layer of complexity, but moderation mistakes could hurt ones Karma, right?
Re:Does it sounds like the death bell for Netscape (Score:1)
remy
http://www.mklinux.org
Pasturized. (Score:1)
It was inevitable (Score:1)
Therefore, the political necessity for having old Netscape hands in AOL at a senior level is over, no matter how competent a CTO marka was (and I don't doubt that he was competent). Offering the position as a plum to Sun was probably inevitable.
In preindustrial societies, strategic alliances between family groups were cemented by cross-marriages and exchanges of material gifts. It seems that nothing much has changed.
--
Re:sigh (Score:1)
Marc Andreessen is not just any exec, he's played an important role in the emergence of the web.
Plus he used to be "one of us".
The whole bussiness of AOL and Netscape is also intertwined with the future of the software project that really launched the "open source" moniker in the publics eye, Mozilla.
So I really think it is an interesting article and that Slashdot should continue brining us this kind of news!
EJB
Re:the murdered body of Clinton aid Vince Foster (Score:1)
always thought it was Billary who did that.
Re:Andreesen's Homecoming... (Score:1)
Linux is to Free Beer what Netscape is to Lite Beer?
Marc and Bark (Score:1)
Re:What has Andreeson really done? (Score:1)
While Andreesen is nowhere near as bad as some here make him sound, he's also hardly as omniscient as this poster, steeped in Forbes/Fortune/Herring/Fast Company biz porn, made him out to be either. He's a reasonably bright guy with good hair and straight teeth who was in the right place at the right time.
If only we all could say the same.
netscape dead, AOL in control.. (Score:2)
does this announcement mean i am officially freed from any guilt of supporting microsoft by using MSIE..? at least until icab supports javascript, or Mozilla is real..?
in my mind, Microsoft Guilt and AOL Guilt cancel each other out.. it just kind of feels like all the spirit and streetcred have gone out of the word "netscape".
-mcc-baka
[standards are dead]
Nope. (Score:1)
Andreesen becoming Stand-up comic (Score:1)
Following his latest success at ".COMedy" in the Miller Lite commercials, Marc Andreesen is focussing his full attention on his career as a star. First starring at the DC Improv, with his fabulous act: "Defending the CaveGeek" his aim is to show how geeks can actually be funny, at least one in a million.
Future plans include a movie, directed by gerbil-man Richard Geer, titled: ".COMmunism" where Andreesen will star along with Free Software founder R.S.
The sequel will be called "Internet II:
Re:netscape dead, AOL in control.. (Score:1)
the mac version numbers do not exactly correspond to the windows version numbers in terms of features.
not that it matters.
ok i feel stupid now.
Re:Andreessen to devote time to Merriwood (Score:1)
Re:Does it sounds like the death bell for Netscape (Score:1)
It actually is more of a threat to Microsoft. Microsoft makes literally NOTHING that runs on Linux. However, they don't perceive it as very much of a threat at this moment because the average user couldn't figure out Linux very well, and they've got a 95% desktop OS market share, Linux would have to cut away at that big time for them to get worried.
AOL ships with IE! (Score:1)
Can't blame him for leaving!
Re:Andreesen's Homecoming... (Score:1)
Skill, timing, luck (Score:2)
What makes one a visionary in the computer business? A bunch of "kids" at Stanford decide to take advantage of the new-fangled internet and form a company that is now a major force. Am I talking about Yahoo or Sun? Two guys in silicon valley put together a personal computer and sell it to their fellow nerds. Later, one of them brings the GUI to the masses (and later the personal laser printer). A computer uber-geek decides that software should be free so that the source code can be seen by everybody. A college student wants to work on unix at home, so he decides to create one that he can use. He then makes the source code available for all to see. A nerd in an obscure college in Michigan puts up a web site that caters to an obscure OS, and makes it a meeting place for fellow nerds.
So what makes one a visionary in the computer business. Skill? Timing? Luck?
BTW, there once was a person that was dumped by the company that started. At the time he was dumped it was said that he was not suitable to take that company into the future. This person name is Steve and he is back. The company is improving.
craw, now posting using no score.
Re:What has Linus really done? (Score:2)
Unlike MarcA, Linus still codes. 'Nuff said.
Re:Andressen actualy sucks.... (Score:2)
The Mosaic code is still available from NCSA. The Mozilla code is still available at mozilla.org. Read the two. There's no real similarity.
Mozilla was very definitely a "second project" (the project that is supposed to be a total re-write "done right", but turns out to be a bloated mess -- read Brookes).
-E
I'm an incompetent CTO, too. (Score:1)
A lot of posters to Slashdot have the same qualities :-) A lot of it is simple "maturity", younger people rarely have it, but usually think they do. Another part of it is understanding a concept from another person's point of view, which few geeks are willing to do.
Business reasons are often like peacock feathers: utterly stupid and wasteful from any logical perspective, yet somehow evolution seems to favor them. Businesses that survive do things in a "business" manner. Geeks in a business environment are always telling management how stupid they are for putting such big feathers on a peacock, when better solutions exist. And geeks know they are absolutely right, thus the problem.
Marc was simply one of those geeks (making assumptions by extrapolating from my own experience). BTW, so were Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Jobs got pushed out of Apple for much the same reasons. In Jobs' case, he conflicted with management until he was pushed out. It wasn't an issue if Jobs was right or wrong, only that his geekness made him incompatible with those who ran the company. However, once geeks like Jobs and Gates start running the place, they actually prove that their non-business-practices have merit.
The problem for geeks/nerds everywhere is that business is much like the military: to become a leader, you have to prove that you are a good follower, even those two skills aren't directly related. For geeks to get into a position of power (in order to implement the ideas that they know are right), they have to stop being so difficult and arrogant, even when it is obvious that management are idiots.
Of course, OpenSource often does an end-run around business, but it doesn't mean you'll get the $$$ or the babes going that route :-)
Re:What has Andreeson really done? (Score:1)
----------------
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein
Offtopic: Redundant code (Score:1)
The "else" is redundant since the object of the if is an unconditional jump. Sorry to be pedantic, and I realize the comment was the point. Still, flawed code posted here ought not to escape silently, lest novice programmers come to believe that such sloppy style has been tacitly blessed.
--
Re:I'm an incompetent CTO, too. (Score:1)
Sigh, more MS weenie work... (Score:2)
Yeah, Linus hacks other contributors' code too, but that's part of being project lead.
IMHO, you either a) don't know what you're talking about, b) are working for the Microsoft "smear Linux" team, or c) all of the above.
-E
Re:Andreesen's Homecoming... (Score:1)
Re:Read my lips (Score:1)
It does begin to look this way, doesn't it? Your Chief Strategist moves over to become CTO of another company with which you maintain a close alliance...
Now, this would be interesting. It would make sense of what McNealey is saying that he doesn't want to see MS broken up by DOJ. AOL is aided by a stable Windows marketplace to ease it's entrance into more and more homes.
Sun/AOL would be a powerful force to challenge MS on many fronts. On the one hand, they'll be able to push MS in certain directions with regard to on-line features, on the other, they'll be able to push thin clients into homes and businesses. Of course, MS would probably respond by backing MSN even more, but MS hasn't been successful fighting AOL in the past...
If Sun/AOL combine, look for the combination to attempt to capture the burgeoning ASP market. Maybe this is why Intel is making noise about getting into the ASP market. They saw this coming and they're concerned that those Application Servers won't have Intel Inside. Even without a real Sun/AOL merger, an AOL ASP entry would probably be on Sun/Sparc based.
if he didn't , someone else would have. marc.fat() (Score:1)
COME ON - if he didn't write the first browser - someone else would have
Re:Skill, timing, luck (Score:1)
Once again posting with no score.
Re:Offtopic: Redundant code (Score:1)
if (x==LASTCHAR) exit(0);
x++;
:P
Re:washingtonpost.com flooded? (Score:1)
Here's an idea: Slashdot Effect as scalability test. Post a link to a site that wants to be tested, and slashdotters will be sure to follow it. Bingo, they get a real-world test (well approximately) of their web server's capabilities under heavy load.
Is this so much different from the LinuxPPC cracking (or W2K-test) site?
--
Re:Offtopic: Redundant code (Score:1)