Valve's headset is designed to play 2d games, that will become clearer when the launch titles are announced (Half Life 3 in 2d is the likely launch title). It's essentially a Steam Deck with a portable monitor as big as you want. The fact that it plays VR games is a secondary feature, nothing wrong with that. It's even been reported that the display isn't as good as a Quest 3 for PCVR.

source: https://www.roadtovr.com/steam...

The speculation I've seen for this decision revolves around Google's vast 2d app/gamestore and/or Valve/Steam's vast 2d game store. Valve has already decided that 2d gaming in VR is the future - with VR essentially just a really big monitor pressed up to your face. Likely Lenovo and Asus agreed, or asked to wait and see if Valve was right. If Valve is right then Google's 2d app/game store far outweighs Meta's 3d app/game store. Which means any third parties are best partnering with whatever Google goes with - despite Google having gave up on VR once recently (Daydream anyone?).

They have a "Resolution limit matrix" on their free calculator page ( https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/resea... ) and a 4k or higher resolution is indicated as noticeable by your eyes for more than half of the chart! The summary only works for the smallest of tvs 20 inches and at 30 inches it's 50/50 depending on your viewing distance. But 40 inches or above and you should really be considering something with more resolution depending on your viewing distance.

A meta article on how to change prompt visibility and delete your prompts. https://www.meta.com/help/arti...

Every child, in the class I referred to, is indeed being handed a chrome book. Don't let your lack of knowledge about a specific class make you think you know that there are exceptions in that specific class. I caveated my comment, you did not.

Who care about the cell phones when the school is the one handing every kid a Chromebook and then refusing to supervise their use when in classrooms. I hate when a teacher asks me to help keep my kid from being distracted on their Chromebook. I always just flatly say, take it away from them - I don't want them to have it in class anyways. This is 100% a problem of their making. Yes, they have net nannies, but their software doesn't adapt as quickly as these kids do.
joe.

If you invite one of these into city, say goodbye to what's left of your night sky.

https://gizmodo.com/your-phone...
https://arstechnica.com/gadget...
Yeah, turns out these articles were wrong and Apple was having you gaslight everyone.

This is the last version signed by the original developer. Download it while you can and keep it safe.

https://www.macbartender.com/B... 5.dmg

"I don't see his home address, I see a photo of him in his back garden." Good luck fighting no one.
Joseph Elwell.

I am 100% with you on this. I disagree with doxxing as a principle - not because of who is right or left. I think the proper outcome (although I'm not sure I'd like it) would be for politicians to enact laws to curtail speech. Although honestly, I'm sure the Supreme Court has already ruled (at some point) that this kind of speech is not protected - it's just no law enforcement wants to get involved.
Joseph Elwell.

You did not read the article closely enough. I'm not going to point out the obvious doxxing they did as then I will be participating.

Also, it's been years since I posted on Slashdot. Is this kind of gutter talk the dialogue I can expect here? Is "drinkypoo" a serious username and are their comments to be taken seriously if they're just swearing at people? wow.

"your mind"?
You don't know me. I said nothing of the right doxxing. Doxxing is bad across the board.