Network Solutions to Sell WHOIS Ads 67
Wired 2000 writes "A news article on InternetNews reports that Network Solutions plans to sell ad space on the WHOIS database, which raises the question whether NSI is allowed to profit off a database which they no longer own, particularly the highly trafficked WHOIS database. "
Re:Heard of phone books? (Score:3)
The telco will slap you with a lawsuit so fast it'll make your head spin if you duplicat a phone book, or use it to build your own list for business purposes.
Companies such as telesurveying organizations sometimes end up using photocopied telephone book pages, but only with a waiver from the client stating that the client is liable and not the surveying org.
I got lectured to about this while in my indenture at Western Wats, years ago when i was just out of highschool, flat broke, and $5.50/hr sounded pretty good.
The companies that make these CDs with huge telephone directories go to great lengths to compile phone lists from other sources, and document those sources.
Case in point: My mother has never, ever had a telephone number in her own name, but is listed in nearly every one of those cd-rom databases, on some of them not only in Utah but also in New York and Hawaii at the numbers the family once occupied in those states.
True, the telco does sell advertising space on the cover and in the back of the phone book, but they don't make you sit through a promotional message with every 411 call, do they?
If you thought NSI was expen$ive, try ARIN (Score:1)
I moved a while back, and just noticed that ARIN didn't have my current address - and had constructed a new NIC handle from my old one when they spun off.
While I was there I took a look at their fee structure - and was floored. $2,500 for a class-C - IF you qualify. And then $30 a year to maintain it, too. This is on top of my domain name, of course. Don't like it? Rent some numbers from your ISP, or THEIR ISP, or the one above them. And pay their markup. Of course if you move, or change ISPs, you'll have to change your numbers. (A private block is now called "portable".) And the ISP will want you to pay for all those numbers (that THEY have to pay for) whether they're routing packets to them or not.
And if I want an ASN (Autonomous System Number) so I can participate in the more advanced routing protocols, that's ANOTHER 500 bucks, and ANOTHER $30 annual fee.
They've started allocating IPv6 addresses, too. You know, the new version of internet protocol with about 10**39 addresses - enough addresses to assign a big block to every atom in the lithospere. (Or is that enough to give several to every subatomic particle in the known universe?) But they want to conserve those, too (maybe encoding routing information into them - and thus casting it in concrete and recreating the pre-dotist mail routing problems). So pony up a few kilobux if you want an allocation. And keep yet another $30 annual fee coming, forever.
I wouldn't mind the ads at all... (Score:1)
Why can't... (Score:1)
now there's an idea.
Embedded Advertisements (Score:1)
This information bought to you by Pepsi(tm) :
COKE-DOM
Coca Cola Corporation..
..
..
..
:)
"Binaries may die but source code lives forever"
-- Unknown
SkyHawk
Andrew Fremantle
ANDOVER.NET already putting ads on WHOIS! (Score:2)
Visit www.askreggie.com [askreggie.com] and you'll see one of many WHOIS web page interfaces with adverts. AskReggie happens to be owned by Andover.net, who also own Slashdot.
The point? Well you have to realise that Network Solutions are talking about doing exactly the same thing; putting adverts on their WEB PAGE INTERFACE and NOT, I repeat NOT, on the actual WHOIS data itself.
So if you continue using a command-line or desktop WHOIS utility, or use the same web page outside Network Solutions that you already do, then you'll get no more or less adverts than you ever did.
In short: this is a NON-STORY.
Which makes me wonder whether the people who wrote the story and submitted it understand the difference between a WEB PAGE INTERFACE and real, proper, raw WHOIS query. FFS.
--
Re:0h my gawd (Score:1)
By Elizabeth Wasserman for 'The Industry Standard'
March 26, 1999
Network Solutions' decision to reroute traffic from InterNIC.net puts speed bumps in the road
to competition.
The brazen move by Network Solutions Inc. last week to reroute traffic from the InterNIC to the company's homepage and redirect the popular "whois" directory annoyed the government,
prospective competitors and many others in the Internet community.
It also exposed potholes along the road to competition in the market for registering cyberspace addresses. The "whois" directory enabled anyone to check who owns a particular domain name. NSI's action means that the public and competing registrars can still check whether a name is in use, but now they must hunt for it at NSI's site. It also means the considerable "brand" equity of InterNIC now reverts to NSI.
Now this means you will probably spammed with a geocity type pop-up when you do a whois search on their page... groovy baybee
March 29 was supposed to mark the deadline for applicants seeking approval of the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers to compete with Network Solutions in the business of registering domain names for a two-month test. Even if NSI decides to reverse its position, ICANN President Michael Roberts said the deadline has been extended until April 8, and the decision on the five new registrars will be delayed until April 21 due to the questions raised by NSI last week.
The move by the Herndon, Va.-based company, which has had an exclusive government contract to administer names in the popular
Many players bombarded ICANN and the U.S. Department of Commerce with questions about what
was going on. If NSI, without prior notice to the U.S. government, could boldly claim as company
property what many have come to view as a public resource, what would prevent the company from
taking other actions to thwart competition?
Definitely seems that they're taking other actions now. Unethical actions upon a trusted system which logically isn't their property.
"It was a shot across the bow," says Rich Forman, founder of Register.com, which has become one of the largest registrars of cyberspace addresses and plans to apply to become an ICANN "test" registrar. "The InterNIC and the 'whois' database were almost like the U.S. Postal Service. It was quasi-public and had a lot of trust built up in it.It was a public entity that people had trust in, and now they've turned it into a private vehicle."
NSI said in a statement that the move was designed to "help customers more easily find the information, services and tools they need." NSI spokesman Chris Clough said the company's action
was customer driven.
cough...bullshit "The intent was to make it simpler and easier and to consolidate the services we offer," he said. NSI combined the InterNIC domain-name-addressing site with its own homepage and said the new site was both faster to download and easier to reach.
But the rerouting of InterNIC also left potential competitors raising questions that U.S. officials had failed to resolve during their own negotiations with NSI. Under a cooperative agreement signed in October, NSI basically consented to operate the registry system for the most popular domains until 2000.
The registry function is akin to a wholesaler. Competition is being introduced initially by ICANN on the retail side, where registrars - including NSI - will compete for customers.
But the cooperative agreement left open certain issues, even though the countdown to competition
has already begun. In particular, companies that are considering entering the field still don't know what price the registry will charge registrars for each domain name sold. Another outstanding issue is the technical specifications for the electronic interface between the registrar system and the NSI system, as well as the terms of the contracts that will be entered into between registrars and the registry.
"From our position, we have to depend on the DoC and ICANN to work out what is the ongoing
relationship," says Sean Brophy, VP of corporate development at Verio, NSI's largest customer and a
major Web-hosting company. "This has not been terribly smooth," Brophy adds. "We are now seeing
a set of actions by people who are trying to position themselves very strongly."
Verio has not yet publicly announced whether it will apply to be a test registrar, but it is considered a likely candidate. Among the big-name companies that have inquired about entry to the domain-name marketplace, although they may not submit applications for the test, are MCI-WorldCom, America Online, Deutsche Telekom, France Telecom and even AT&T.
Meanwhile, smaller companies that have been acting as intermediaries between NSI and consumers fear they will lose out as InterNIC becomes associated with NSI's brand. "It's like being channel 3, 6
or 10 as opposed to 57," says Larry Erlich of Domainregistry.com.
Re:Interesting. Do they plan to sell ads by query? (Score:1)
--patrick
Re:Why this is actually a Good Thing (tm). (Score:1)
And no "revolution" is coming to stop NSI. Just the same shitty-ass market forces that say those with big money will make even more money.
Sure they can do it... (Score:1)
(first post?)
They must own the database... (Score:1)
By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree that you will use this Data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this Data to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail (spam)
They are just trying to piss everyone off... (Score:1)
Gordon
Just the web page! (Score:4)
I don't see anything wrong with that. Whois isn't a web service, it's a service that uses the whois protocol. NSI has a gateway to it up on their page, and seeing as NSI has a quasi-monopoly on domain registration, it's a very popular page. But anyone else can create a gateway to whois just as easily, and tons of people have - for instance just about every web hosting company which registers domain names. Many other whois gateways on the web already have ads, and there shouldn't be a different policy for NSI's.
Of course, if they start limiting direct whois access or placing text ads on results, that's another story. From everything I've read, though, they're not planning to do that.
Re:third comment! (Score:1)
*sobs*
Heard of phone books? (Score:2)
Things would get a little more complicated if they decided to disallow queries to their version of the database. That would be a somewhat different issue, though.
Re:What's with the WHOIS db anyways?! (Score:1)
Oh, the places you'll sell (Score:1)
NSI's Recent Track Record (Score:1)
You're not quite understanding this . . . (Score:3)
If you're using whois from the command line, you will likely not see those animated GIF banner ads, am I right?
So now let me ask you again -- do you really care?
New "whois" binary (Score:1)
Why this is a Bad Thing(tm) (Score:2)
Later tonight there will be a letter and petition for ISPs to sign on the website. The letter will be directed to the Dept of Justice and the Dept of Commerce asking them to look into this and stop NSI from acting in this fashion, and the petition will be an open petition to all registries and registrars calling for Domain Registration sites to be safe havens from this type of activity, and will spell out why.
ISPs are the the single source more responsible for funnelling domain registrations to NSI, and if another registrar caters to them, by providing a safe and easy way for ISPs to funnel their registrations through them, they will use their influence with their customers to show their dissatisfaction.
--
William X. Walsh
william@dso.net / william@dnspolicy.com
DSo Internet Services
(IDNO MEMBER)
Support the Cyberspace Association, the
constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org
what about the alt= tag? (Score:1)
Re:third comment! (Score:1)
Re:Sure they can do it... (Score:2)
(joke)
Re:Heard of phone books? (Score:1)
AT&T and other companies copy the information out of phone books in order to fill in their own lists. I'm not sure of the court case that made the phone book information public domain, but it has was within the last 3 years.
Lando
Missing the point (Score:2)
Re:NSI can go scratch my balls. (Score:1)
N$I (Score:2)
"Hey! Let's sell ad space on a government-owned database! That'll further the conception that it's our property!"
Notwork Delusions [min.net] strikes again. They're rising quickly on my "companies that must die" list, joining the ranks of Microsoft, Bell Atlantic, and UUNet..
---
Hell, they're selling the contents of the database (Score:1)
You can't even register for a domain name anymore without getting on a mailing list, and that's just f***ed up.
This just in... (Score:1)
In an effort to make a profit, god has decided to advertise on all newborn human beings. The ads will start appearing on children as soon as next month. More details later. Heh.
Anyway, this doesn't sound like such a bad thing. It is only on their webpage, which I can't say I've ever used anyway. Just don't visit. Or if you must, use junkbuster [junkbusters.com].
my $cents = $penny x 2;
Re:Heard of phone books? (Score:1)
There are lots of directories already that use a subset of the yellow pages.
Re:Heard of phone books? (Score:1)
--
Re:Why this is a Bad Thing(tm) (Score:1)
Incidental Traffic (Score:1)
Mycroft
Re:Why this is a Bad Thing(tm) (Score:1)
Besides, while I agree that being forced to send you customers to pages that show competing banner ads is somewhat tacky (especially considerint NSI is banning competing registrars from advertising), "thems the breaks." If you are sufficiently uncompetitive to retain customers when they see ads for other ISPs, that is pretty lame, too.
Re:They are just trying to piss everyone off... (Score:1)
I don't have a problem with them putting ads on their webpage to make cash...after all, if it was easy to make money on the internet (like all the spams say) then we'd all be spending our days rich and carefree instead of whining on Slashdot.
Now.....if they were to put ads trailing everytime I ran a whois command, I'd blow a fit.
TheGeek
http://www.geekrights.org [geekrights.org]
Interesting. Do they plan to sell ads by query? (Score:1)
I realise they could just put a random ad every time you pull up the page, but there does seem to be some potential for targeting of advertisement here.
Would that be illegal?
Re:TLDNS (Score:1)
Is the guy who wrote the registry for Windows out there reading this? Come one, I know you're into some serious voodoo and black magic, how about doing the world a favor and having NSI fall into a hole in the earth?
"Companies have voted with their feet [on the issue of domains], they want
to have domain names that are international or at least country neutral.
The same freedom should apply to individuals; all individuals should be
able to have and own their own domain names".
-- Paul Mockapetis, creator of the DNS, in On the Internet, September/October 1996.
~Kevin
:)
Re:Incidental Traffic (Score:1)
---
Openstep/NeXTSTEP/Solaris/FreeBSD/Linux/ultrix/OS
Re:Missing the point (Score:2)
To get directory assistance for a different area code, you dial xxx-555-1212, where xxx is the area code you wish to get information about.
This is really pointless, but what the hell.
Bombing NSI (Score:1)
Oh, right. Carry on.
Re:Heard of phone books? (Score:1)
The telco will slap you with a lawsuit so fast it'll make your head spin if you duplicat a phone book, or use it to build your own list for business purposes.
They may slap you with a lawsuit, but there's no certainty they will win it. In 1991, the Supreme Court ruled that the raw data in a white-pages phone book was not protected by copyright, only the way in which that data is presented.
The case was Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc. [harvard.edu], and the Supreme Court said: "This case concerns the interaction of two well-established propositions. The first is that facts are not copyrightable; the other, that compilations of facts generally are." In the end, they decided that the white pages were insufficiently original to warrant copyright protection.
I have to wonder if the WHOIS database that NSI "owns" is actually original enough to be deserving of copyright protection, but that's not up to me to decide...
Re:NSI's Recent Track Record (Score:1)
Define "lately." :-)
I had to look up this story at CNet [news.com] to know what on earth you were talking about. Gotta love MAPS. They sure deserve my $35/year more than NSI does.
Hmmm, interesting... part of it says: "[Jonathan] Emery [NSI's general counsel] added that far from being spam, NSI's emails were 'vital catalysts to free and open commerce,' and that customers have the ability to get off the marketing list."
Someone tell me where the opt-out page on NSI's Web site is, please, I beg you!
Re:Why this is a Bad Thing(tm) (Score:1)
--
William X. Walsh
william@dso.net / william@dnspolicy.com
DSo Internet Services
(IDNO MEMBER)
Support the Cyberspace Association, the
constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org [idno.org]
Wait a minute. (Score:1)
Where's the news? If you go to http://www.networksolutions.com/cgi-bin/whois/who
Albeit they are merely ads for linking to another part of NSI's site, the fact that they were/are there should have been enough advance warning for anybody with multiple brain cells and synapse function to figure out that they would eventually run full fledged ad campaigns.
The problem being, no matter where they stick the ads, you can't stop them; they're not inserting the ads into the actual whois database, they're putting them on the pages and what not that display and format pieces of information from that database. So they very well could even put text ads into whois replies if they wanted to.
Ads are everywhere. You get them in snail mail constantly just like you get them through email (though notice how nobody goes and tracks down the postal company that sent it to get the sender shut down?), you see them on tv (they fit shows in between them on occasion), you get them in magazines, in the phone book, in your newspaper, you get them driving down the highway.
This particular case is not NSI being evil (though trust me, I don't like them one bit), just them jumping on the bandwagon with everybody else.
--
Mark Waterous (mark@projectlinux.org)
0h my gawd (Score:1)
Secondly this should be unconstitutional being that the whois database is not theirs. Maybe they should advertise that and donate the money to ICANN [icann.org] ooops That'd probably hurt them more then it would help them since they seem to want to monopolize the Domain Registration business.
heh the John Gotti's of the Domain registration world.
Someone should wake them up from their domination fantasies. register.com [register.com] registers more domain than they do.
Maybe they should join in the adverstising business and give NSI (network stupidity inc) a run for the monopolized cash.
home sweet home [self-evident.com]
Re:They are just trying to piss everyone off... (Score:1)
Nah just whip out a perl script to do the whois query's for you and have it remove the ads before showing the information to you. Similiar to junkbuster for webpages
RTFF (Score:1)
In the faq, under the unix section, it tells you to update your DNS server.
UNIX
Edit /etc/resolv.conf in a similar way to the following:
domain your.domain
nameserver 209.50.251.49
nameserver 209.50.251.51
It is likely there are other commands in there that you should leave in place.
Additionally, you may normally only have 3 nameserver commands. In which case you may prefer to just use our first nameserver if you have 2 already. Place ours first.
I'm not very impressed... (Score:2)
[Network Solutions (R) the dot com people (TM)]Home | Services | Find | Help | About Us
No match for "WWW.NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM".
Of course, if you change the query a little, you can find it, but then shouldn't they alter that whole cutesy "Search for a web address" message? Bah.
...and didn't Sun already do that whole stupid "dot com" advertising stunt?
Whois and advertisers... (Score:1)