
LinkedIn Seems To Be Working on an AI 'Coach' for Job Applications (theverge.com) 14
LinkedIn appears to be developing a new AI tool that can help ease the effectively robotic task of looking for and applying to jobs. From a report: According to a new leak, the Microsoft-owned company seems to have a new "LinkedIn Coach" assistant in testing that could support you through the application processes, teach you new skills, and help you network on your LinkedIn network. The news comes from app researcher Nima Owji, who uncovers features from various developers that haven't been deployed yet. In an email, LinkedIn spokesperson Amanda Purvis tells The Verge the company is "always exploring" new ways to improve user experience on the platform. Purvis adds that the company "will have more to share soon."
standardize resumes and submissions for positions (Score:5, Insightful)
If they standardize requirements for job positions and work conditions for the IT field and finally put to be bed what a remote position means they will have made a great stride.
If they put metrics on placement and contracting firms that applicants can see they will change the industry.
None of the above require AI, just requiring the LinkedIN to value the the time of the resource they are selling.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm how do you "standardize" a resume? That makes no sense. Not unless you weaken what standardize means to the point wherein we'd say it's already standardized.
Re: (Score:2)
Conversely, the best interviews I've been in have focused on technical questions instead of "explain a situation where you did blah", especially a se
Not AI (Score:5, Insightful)
The way people use the term now, it seems every automated process, algorithm or piece of logic is AI. It's not Intelligence. It's just getting annoying. AI is the new marketing buzzword, and like most marketing people, they don't know what the fuck they're talking about nor do they care (as long as they get clicks or sales)
Re: (Score:2)
Same as it always is. The marketing geniuses get ahold of a term, and it ceases to have any meaning whatsoever. It's just a buzzword, utterly devoid of any form of actual communicative value.
Re: (Score:2)
There needs to be a 'personal' AI that is trained on every detail of someone's life.... their medical records, financial records, education records, hobbies, interests, family details, calendar, etc that can function as a proxy for that person. It could apply for jobs, conduct interviews, purchase household supplies, handle investments, etc, only asking for occasional confirmation from a human for large decisions. I would subscribe to this, it would free up so much time.
While I agree in some ways, we know that in this world the only way we'd be allowed to have these proxy AIs would be if they were hosted (actually, owned) by some giant conglomerate corporation. And if they have control, which they will, expect them to push each and every proxy AI to do their bidding more and more until people have to seek legal recourse against the owners. The only question would be if the owners could convince the courts that the proxy's "youness" is legally binding. And who is going to w
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the AI could take the job too. Just train it everything you know.
Ouroboros (Score:2)
Microsof Seems To Be Working on an AI 'Coach' for (Score:1)
Undoubtedly (Score:1)