OpenSUSE 10.1 Review: "Versatile but Uneven" 38
capt turnpike writes "Calling it 'solid,' the eWEEK.com lab boys tested OpenSUSE 10.1. The upshot? FTA: "We appreciated the ambitious scope of OpenSUSE 10.1's configuration tools, but we also ran into some areas in which Yast's reach frustratingly exceeded its grasp." What does that mean for Novell's newest version of Linux? And when will it catch up numerically to Apple, which is already at 10.4.6?"
Re:numerical catch up (Score:1)
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2)
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2, Funny)
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2)
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2)
Firefox 2006.4 etc.
thus you kind of avoid the version number problem , you can always append A or B is it is an alpha or beta.
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2)
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2)
Re:numerical catch up (Score:2)
Sounds very stupid to me. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sounds very stupid to me. (Score:3, Informative)
Eh? I don't see no jump [wikipedia.org]
Re:Sounds very stupid to me. (Score:2)
10.4.6 - 10.1 (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What is OpenSUSE? (Score:1)
Re:What is OpenSUSE? (Score:2)
Why can't it read the raw ISO files without having to do a loop back mount? Why can't I specify a port for the http method? Why isn't there any really good documentation on how to actually set it up, especially if you're trying to boot it from a non-SuSE or *gasp* a non-Linux box? Telling Joe Admin to run yast2 instserver doesn't do much good if you don't actually have a place to run it from.
I'd love to find a way to make the default console show up in monochrome as wel
Re:What is OpenSUSE? (Score:3, Informative)
I downloaded the OpenSUSE CDs and net boot image from here [opensuse.org]
I followed this item [opensuse.org]
Followed by this [opensuse.org] one
Then I did this [opensuse.org]
I then booted off of the cd made from the net boot image. I adjusted the mount points and exports to fit my local enviroment
On a side note: I did the X86_64 install to see how OpenSUSE got the Java plugin to work in Firefox. It was easy
Re:What is OpenSUSE? (Score:1)
Re:FTA ? (Score:2)
Re:FTA ? (Score:1, Funny)
Fuck the article? I must not be in a good mood today....
Novell's ZenWorks killed SuSE 10.1 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Novell's ZenWorks killed SuSE 10.1 (Score:1)
My impressions of SuSE 10.1 (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:My impressions of SuSE 10.1 (Score:1)
An A/C poster mentioned this and you mentioned that the autoinstaller has been disabled. I hope its not true and its just a troll.
Re:My impressions of SuSE 10.1 (Score:4, Informative)
Go to YaST -> Installation Sources
Check each source to make sure that Refresh is set to "Off"
They made "ON" the default in 10.1, presumably in response to many folks' complaining about the installer's handling of broken repositories such as Packman. (Great repository for selection, but it's perpetually broken).
Livecd? (Score:2)
Dude, go with (k)Ubuntu (Score:2)
If you'd like to get a feel for Linux before installing, try out Mepis [mepis.org] (which I'm pretty sure is a LiveCD) or Knoppix [knoppix.org] (which is not very polished, but does give you a KDE desktop to play with
My2 cents on Suse 10.1 (I'm using it now.) (Score:4, Informative)
( http://img436.imageshack.us/img436/7408/dscn20214
Anyway, Suse 10.1 SUCKS.. SUCKS with a capital SUCK.
This weekend I will be downgrading it to 10.0 (I was not too thrilled with 10.0 but it's better than this crap)
Unless you want a miserable hellish nightmare trying to install *other* apps stay away.
The Zen thingy is a piece of crap. It won't let me install apt/synaptic which is what I have been using for a few years now.
I am afraid that this will be my last hurrah with Suse. I'm going to have to bite the bullet and learn Gentoo. Before this year is out I plan to be dual booting OSX and Gentoo..
Buh bye Suse, you f**ked it up.. It was fun though..
One thing someone pointed out to me is the "smart" installer. Go to yast and search for "smart" then install it. It's similar (but not the same) as apt/synaptic. It will at least let you get some of the basic packages installed, you also have to paste this into a console, 'smart channel --add http://divine160281.di.funpic.de/smart-channel.tx
But all in all, I'm very unhappy in general with Suse 10.1 and will be downgrading to 10.0 no matter what. And forget about bling-bling compiz, that's a freaking disaster. You like to torture yourself? Play with compiz. Guaranteed to crash more often that M$ winders..
Once they get compiz and Xgl debugged I'll be thrilled to play with it again but it's way to unstable for me. I need stability. I have no tolerance for buggy crap.
Re:My2 cents on Suse 10.1 (I'm using it now.) (Score:2)
The first nasty surprise was the replacement of susewatcher -- zen-updater took its place. I am a KDE user, and it made no sense to me that a KDE oriented desktop distribution would commit the major blunder of replacing a working Qt application with a half-baked
SuSE 10.1 = Package management from hell (Score:3, Informative)
Doing production (Score:2, Informative)
It's OK, I guess (Score:2)
I always hated YaST for package management, so the option of using APT is a big win. I haven't tried the ZenWorks or 'smart' package managers everyone else is talking about.
Basically, for a server it's OK. I'd rather be running Debian, but the software I need to run is built for SLES.
sdgasdf (Score:1)