Second quarter Open Source Awards announced 106
JohnGrahamCumming writes "The Open Source Initiative has announced its Q2 award winners here. Three people/projects got $500 Merit Awards: Martin Pool for distcc, Tom Lord for GNU Arch and The GIMP. OSI is currently looking for nominations for the Q3 awards to be announced at OSCON."
See!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:See!!! (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand, the recognition may land them jobs as developers or as managers of a group of developers.
Re:See!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:See!!! (Score:1)
Trust me on that one.
Re:See!!! (Score:1)
That depends. Are we talking about Top Ramen? Or one of its close cousins: Bottom, Up, Down, Charm or Strange Ramen?
(Mmmmm. Strange Ramen!)
My local store sells ramen for about $1 each. If you bought 500 packets of ramen and ate them all, one after the other, what would happen? Well that is something to which we already have the answer [twiztv.com]. You would enter a sort of mental fugue, and your perception of time would slow down to the po
Re:See!!! (Score:1)
Re:See!!! (Score:5, Funny)
All they need now is another $199.
Re:See!!! (Score:1)
Oh for some mod points...
Congrats (Score:1)
Re:I thought The Gimp was a Tarantino character? (Score:1, Offtopic)
I'm sure many people have downloaded both forms of the GIMP over the years, however....
Re:I thought The Gimp was a Tarantino character? (Score:1, Funny)
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?i
That might confuse you even more...
Re:I thought The Gimp was a Tarantino character? (Score:1, Interesting)
awards 4 times a year (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:awards 4 times a year (Score:5, Informative)
John.
Re:awards 4 times a year (Score:3, Insightful)
People will probably send these maintainers the email equivalent of a slap on the back, and thumbs up.
Also, it draws attention to the developers. Some of these guys might end up hired as a result of these announcements. Tom Lord especially, since two of his projects won.
Re:awards 4 times a year (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:awards 4 times a year (Score:1)
Re:awards 4 times a year (Score:3, Informative)
See the Open Source Awards Charter [opensource.org] for more details.
Wide open (Score:3, Funny)
"OSI is currently looking for nominations for the Q3 awards to be announced at OSCON."
I nominate these (wide) open sourcers [securityfocus.com] from Washington state.Speech... (Score:5, Funny)
Some worthy projects in my opinion (Score:5, Interesting)
Imgseek classifies bitmap images based on similarity . http://imgseek.sourceforge.net/
Both would be awesome if converted into libraries used by other programs.
Actually (Score:1)
Re:Some worthy projects in my opinion (Score:3, Informative)
It's not hard, all it takes is sending an email!
John.
Re:Some worthy projects in my opinion (Score:3, Insightful)
Hear hear! There are so many great programs that are really just front-ends for some service, and yet aren't implemented as such. A classic example is netpbm, a great set of image manipulation programs to crop, rotate, convert formats etc - just the kind of operations that would be perfect in a general-purpose image manipulation library. But alas, all the logic is bound up in the program.
No award for Eric Raymond? (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't know this as fact, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
It would seem to me that the awards go to people/teams that have created great Open Source software, not evangelists.
I could be wrong though.
Re:I don't know this as fact, but... (Score:2, Interesting)
Arguably the award for Gnu Arch was made to evangelists. They even go out of their way on their opening page (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch) to slam those who aren't true enough in their beliefs:
It is somewhat well known, these days, that some of the core developers of the Linux kernel are using a revision control system which is not free software. There is a need to create a free
Arch is also a great project in its own right. (Score:2)
You might note, by the way, that the gnu.org Arch site is not the primary Arch site (certainly not the most frequently updated), though that's the one linked by the article. (www/wiki).gnuarch.org are Arch's primary frontends to the world.
...and just to reemphasize... (Score:2)
Re:No award for Eric Raymond? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:No award for Eric Raymond? (Score:1)
OSI Board of Directors [opensource.org]
Re:No award for Eric Raymond? (Score:1)
Pearpc for Q3 (Score:3, Informative)
pearpc.sourceforge.net because that project acommplished what many people tought to be imposible.I mean a ppc emulator that runs OSX deserves a prize.
Re:Pearpc for Q3 (Score:2)
If they get the speed up to something a bit more reasonable, it'd definitely be a worthy candidate.
Re:Pearpc for Q3 (Score:1)
GIMP is all you need. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:2)
The idea of the GIMP is to provide you with the tools to do the job. It is supposed to be extended by plug-ins. Plug-ins that do not necessarily need to be maintained by the few GIMP core developers. "Save for Web" can easily be implemented in a plug-in. Why has such a plug-in not been written yet? Think about it and tell me.
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:1)
Photoshop includes those features by default,
GIMP dont.
Photoshop not leave you wondering if plugin exist, no time waste trying to find plugin.
> The idea of the GIMP is to provide you with the tools to do the job
sure, the GIMP provides basic tools to the job, but that is not the point here
"if you're used to the power of Photoshop"
to be good enough for someone used to the powerf of Photoshop more needs to be included by default.
blame distribut
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:3)
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:2)
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:1)
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:2)
Re:GIMP is all you need. (Score:1)
GIMP is NOT all you need. (Score:1)
While it's nice to see GIMP getting an award, GIMP is NOT all you need.
It lacks 16-bit-per-color (48-bpp) editing support.
"Why is this stupid feature necessary?", you ask?
It's needed because of cameras like the Canon EOS-300D/10D (see the other slashdot article [slashdot.org]). Canon's RAW format is wonderful for people who need to squeeze every last ounce o
CoLinux (Score:2, Informative)
It should get nominated.
$500! (Score:3, Funny)
Comma delimited lists (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Comma delimited lists (Score:2)
Re:Comma delimited lists (Score:1)
Re:Comma delimited lists (Score:2)
Much nicer, no?
Re:Comma delimited lists (Score:2)
Bigger! More! (Score:4, Insightful)
I have no idea (and I did read a bit) how they manage their money, other than their 503(c) status and necessary government reporting. Do they have an endowment, or do they rely on annual donations to cover the annual (and quarterly) awards?
I would hope they have an endowment. If so, It'd be nice to know how one could make small (less than $100!) donations to the endowment. After all, if lots of little guys would start giving to funds like this*, than they could give out mo'bigger awards, resulting in more media coverage as well as help fund good coders in future projects.
So... do they have an endowment? Do they accept small donations to help fund this endowment? Anybody got details?
* as well as the EFF and other "goods"
Re:Bigger! More! (Score:2)
You can always buy some Open Source Swag [cafeshops.com] if you feel like helping out.
John.
Glad to see Tom Lord get the nod (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Glad to see Tom Lord get the nod (Score:3, Informative)
I thought monotone [venge.net], codeville [codeville.org], and darcs [abridgegame.org] all used the distributed repository model as well as arch & bk. They may be a little further behind in terms of features or surrounding tools, but each one does have some interesting theory/philosophy of version control behind it.
And darcs is written in haskell, so it wins points for enjoying the soundness and showing once again that pure FP can be and is used in the "real world"...
I wouldn't discount any of them yet, but I agree that the subversion fa
My favorite open sourced beverage (Score:2, Funny)
#include "barley"
#include "hops"
#include "water"
#include "yeast"
Submit this story? Green Party Endorses FOSS (Score:1, Insightful)
An interesting development in the current Canadian election [elections.ca] is that at least one party, The Green Party of Canada [greenparty.ca], seems to be paying attention to geeks this time around. The Green Party of Canada endorses open source software [greenparty.ca] in the Science and Technology section of their platform [greenparty.ca]. Some of their promises include:
Kudos to Martin! (Score:1, Informative)
Say what you will about the open software community. Some people may be hot tempered, some may be exclusionary or quick to criticize, but I've yet to find a group so willing to accept people from all walks of life.
Thanks to more than Martin and OSI. Thank you to everyone for making open source a
Re:My work... (Score:2)
Don't do it then. Duh.
If it hurts, you're doing it wrong.