Microsoft Drops .NET Name For Next Windows Server 490
metamatic writes "C|net is reporting that Microsoft is dropping the name "Windows .NET Server" and going back to "Windows Server 200x" (where x is currently expected to be 3). Other products with .NET in the name are also being evaluated for renaming. Analysts are being quoted as saying that slapping .NET on so many Microsoft products has confused people as to what .NET actually means. Or could it be that customers know what it means, but nobody wants to buy it?"
Obiwan Kenobi points out a similar article at ENT News
buzzword compliant? (Score:5, Interesting)
I kinda thought that naming something ".net" was kinda stupid after the bad taste left in Joe Public's mouth after the whole ".com" thing..
but Im far from a rabid Microsoft supporter anyway.
I still think it should be "Microsoft.ownsU" for the truth in advertising requirements.
Maeryk
Misunderstanding (Score:5, Interesting)
Microsoft forgets its failures quickly (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:.NET slapping. (Score:4, Interesting)
It is similar to Java, the big difference being that many many languages could all be compiled into the same bytecode.
What was spiffy was you could very easily use different languages for different parts of your program. Business logic in C, interface in VB, etc.
I know you could do this before but
Re:This is hardly news... (Score:4, Interesting)
Surely a disapointment for ms? (Score:2, Interesting)
The fact that they change the name to something NOT containing the magic term '.NET' must mean, at the least, that all the expensive PR has failed.
microsoft need to actually demonstrate an actual use for
Re:Misunderstanding (Score:3, Interesting)
It sounds like you're taking about WebObjects when you say that...
This is the blurb from the WebObjects site:
"A powerful rapid application development environment, backed by Web service, data access and page generation capabilities, extends the reach of developers and reduces the cost of ownership by ensuring flexible, maintainable design. WebObjects is the ideal way to develop, deploy and extend powerful web services."
The difference being that WebObjects is 5 versions and 3 OSes old now, stable, and based on 'open' technologies, and
What is .NET? (Score:5, Interesting)
in any case, the semantic shift of the label
Re:Confusion? (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html is a good faq (in english, not geek ;)
A sample ----
2. What does TCPA / Palladium do, in ordinary English?
It provides a computing platform on which you can't tamper with the applications, and where these applications can communicate securely with the vendor. The obvious application is digital rights management (DRM): Disney will be able to sell you DVDs that will decrypt and run on a Palladium platform, but which you won't be able to copy. The music industry will be able to sell you music downloads that you won't be able to swap. They will be able to sell you CDs that you'll only be able to play three times, or only on your birthday. All sorts of new marketing possibilities will open up.
TCPA / Palladium will also make it much harder for you to run unlicensed software. Pirate software can be detected and deleted remotely. It will also make it easier for people to rent software rather than buying it; and if you stop paying the rent, then not only does the software stop working but so may the files it created. For years, Bill Gates has dreamed of finding a way to make the Chinese pay for software: Palladium could be the answer to his prayer.
There are many other possibilities. Governments will be able to arrange things so that all Word documents created on civil servants' PCs are `born classified' and can't be leaked electronically to journalists. Auction sites might insist that you use trusted proxy software for bidding, so that you can't bid tactically at the auction. Cheating at computer games could be made more difficult.
There is a downside too. There will be remote censorship: the mechanisms designed to delete pirated music under remote control may be used to delete documents that a court (or a software company) has decided are offensive - this could be anything from pornography to writings that criticise political leaders. Software companies can also make it harder for you to switch to their competitors' products; for example, Word could encrypt all your documents using keys that only Microsoft products have access to; this would mean that you could only read them using Microsoft products, not with any competing word processor.
Re:My theory... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Confusion? (Score:3, Interesting)
Its really just a buzzword laden branding strategy, that MS is using to try to convince people that web services, are all that and a bag of chips. Web services seem to be a fancy name for using xml to provide more useful data to end users of the data.
Re:This is hardly news... (Score:3, Interesting)
Analysts are being quoted as saying that slapping
Your comment:
They are changing the name because people are getting confused about what
Where's +5 Insightfull coming from?
Win XP has something to do with it (Score:3, Interesting)
Whatever happened to XP??? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:.NET is a flop!: On the contrary (Score:2, Interesting)
The cats out of the bag......... (Score:2, Interesting)
To quote some of the artical for those who cant be bothered to go.
"NET is a new way of working things out when using your computer.
With
Given the posibilites
This is a nice idea however and if Microsoft dosn't persue this new strategy some one else will e.g. IBM for example ( just go to google and type Globus).
Re:.NET slapping. (Score:5, Interesting)
What is
If you remember a couple of years ago us Windows developers were doing "DNA" development, which was the title that all the products got (SQL Server was a member of the DNA platform....imagine the outrage when it jumped ship and became a
Re:Confusion? (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Disturbing encounter (Score:3, Interesting)
As my eyes adjusted to the low light, I began to make out a scribbling on the far wall...dot not....dot nut....dot nat....dot nit....dot net??? I couldn't make it out and it worried me. Dot what?
I walked over and traced the ragged letters with my finger tips, trying to imagine who did this...and why. The scrawl was halting and labored. The only thing I could be sure of was that, whomever wrote this message, they were clearly in pain.
I backed out of the room and tried in vain to clear my head...what where they trying to say? Who was behind this cry? Was it a warning to stay away or a dieing request for help?
I went on about my rounds...the day shift would be on soon, and I'd have to return to the future. I'd let them work on this one. I'd heard they had another new open source tool that was made just to analyze these. It was too early and too much for me to consider yet another message from the other side...from the past. The last one took part of my soul, and I need the few little fragments that are left...
Re:Confusion? (Score:3, Interesting)
Sounds good so far...
The obvious application is digital rights management (DRM):
Which, of course, is only of value to the seller.
Disney will be able to sell you DVDs that will decrypt and run on a Palladium platform, but which you won't be able to copy.
Which means I have to buy new hardware to play the new media. This is consistent for a company that will only sell their old movies "for a limited time" to artificially and capriciously drive up demand.
The music industry will be able to sell you music downloads that you won't be able to swap.
Yeah, but I'll need a computer to play them. No listening in the car anymore... unless I buy more new, expensive, and needlessly complex hardware.
They will be able to sell you CDs that you'll only be able
to play three times, or only on your birthday.
No they won't. I would never buy such a product. Of course, the analog hole still exists. I've got a video capture card that does great analog audio capture. I've used it to make nice digital copies of casette recording I made as a kid.
All sorts of new marketing possibilities will open up.
Especially given that companies will deceive, if not downright lie to you. All kinds of new ways to screw the consumer. Of course, all these new electronics gizmos you will _have_ to buy will be complicated to use and prone to malfunctions (at least as first, but always harder to use than their pre-DRM counterparts). You don't need a degree in UI design to play a Victrola, but how many people can use all the features of their stereos or DVD players these days? How much fun will people have when not understanding your hardware prevents you from playing your media? ("I bought this 3-use DVD from Disney (a subsudiary of Evilco) but I only watched the first 30 minutes three times, because my mother called, the power went out, one of the kids wet his pants, etc, etc. Now I can't finish it...")
TCPA / Palladium will also make it much harder for you to run unlicensed software.
So much for software development, one of my hobbies. So much for Open Source software. Oh you say I can become a licensed software provider? For a "nominal" annual fee? Whoopie! I'll pay for that! NOT!
Pirate software can be detected and deleted remotely. It will also make it easier for people to rent software rather than buying it; and if you stop paying the rent, then not only does the software stop working but so may the files it created.
So now companies can take over your computer and arbitrarily delete things. I'm sure that will _always_ work correctly and _never_ be misused, because everyone is completely competent and honest. We should always take every opportunity to give complete strangers control over us, because they know what's best.
For years, Bill Gates has dreamed of finding a way to make the Chinese pay for software: Palladium could be the answer to his prayer.
Not if they keep using Windows 2000 on existing hardware. Recall that these days the primary driving force for selling the latest and greatest hardware is 1.) Microsoft's (and others) increasingly bloated and inefficient software, and 2.) gaming. I use c. 400 MHz processors and don't feel like I'm missing out for 90% of what I do.
There are many other possibilities. Governments will be able to arrange things so that all Word documents created on civil servants' PCs are `born classified' and can't be leaked electronically to journalists.
Remember that joke about the dumb blonde photocopying her monitor to print out her document?
Auction sites might insist that you use trusted proxy software for bidding, so that you can't bid tactically at the auction. Cheating at computer games could be made more difficult.
And that will _never_ be compromised, because it's never happened in the past.
There is a downside too.
No, really?
Sure, there will be some benefits, but as with everything in modern life, the trade-off will be much more complexity and hassle to do things that were formerly simple, and still more aspects of your life will be subject to being screwed up by the ineptness or malice of a complete stranger.
Sign me up!
Re:This is hardly news... (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm still a wee-bit confused by the currently available OS's..
Windows 2000 (Professional|Server|Advanced Server|DataCenter Server)
Windows ME
Windows CE (CE||.NET)
Windows XP (Professional|Home Edition|Media Center|Tablet|Embedded)
Imagine if they just had workstation and server, with nice numbers. I'm still not sure what I'd be running all my servers on, if I went to MS.. Luckly, I don't have to decide. I put the same version of Slackware on everything, and just install the parts I need.. Funny, it all fits on one CD, and I don't even have to pay outragous licensing fees for each version, or packages I add on.
I'm just sad that Slackware hasn't released a distribution for handhelds.. But lucky, "familiar" works on my iPaq.
Every software I've seen uses logical version numbers, except Microsoft.. And they used to even do it.. Well, kinda..
Win3.0
Win3.1
Win3.11
Win95
Win98
Win2000
The jumps in numbers are just too big.. Forget the subrevisions. Build numbers. SP numbers.. I feel sorry for the Microsoft techs who have to take tech calls from people who only know "I use Windows." When friends of friends call me and tell me that, it's like pulling teeth to find out if it's Win98 or XP.. "It came on the computer, how am I suppose to know?"
Re:This is hardly news... (Score:2, Interesting)
Remember that Microsoot's marketing efforts eclipse everything else that they are supposed to be doing...
The first time I saw the expression ".net" in print with reference to an MS API, I thought,"These bastards think they are going to appropriate a TLD that is given only to elements of the Internet's backbone!"...
".NET is symbolic of the oracular "insight" of ownership of the Internet envisioned by MS employees who've done too much of the Brown Acid(tm)!"
I still suspect that ".NET" was a symptom of a form of blindnes afflicting those who sincerely believe that they are God.
What's in a name? (Score:2, Interesting)
Finally (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:This is hardly news... (Score:1, Interesting)
I wish I had a dollar every time I was talking about Office XP and someone thought I meant Windows XP.
I think one of the problem is that, honestly, most people DONT know what
Thats ok, because it all just makes me look good when some doofus cant get it to work!
Re:Confusion? (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes trivial hello world ones and maybe other non gui apps which don't connect to a database. I guess that maybe somewhere around
".NET runs in a virtual machine; its entire standard library is documentated, and it uses standardized plain text formats for communication. "
Documented and open are different things.
" Apparently working at MS makes one very adept at wordplay.
You never quit do you? Are you this rude to all total strangers?
1. Some
2.
3. There are no technical barriers that are impossible to overcome which prevent
"4. The only barriers that exisit are in fact legal. We will have to see how they turn out."
Given the past behaviour or MS I think we can take a fair guess at how this is going to turn out.
"Satisified now? Or are you just going to continue to be an asshole?"
I think I will continue to be an asshole as long as MS trolls like you get modded up so high here on slashdot.
Listen cross platform languages are hard but they are not rocket science. Open source developers have written PERL, PHP, Python, Ruby, and a ton of other languages and toolkits that allow you to write cross platform applications. Of course somehow Sun managed to write java which does the same thing too.
Either MS programmers are very very stupid and can't manage to write a cross platform CLR or MS does not want to. My guess is the latter.
Difference is... (Score:4, Interesting)
C++ is C++.
C++ under
I'm not saying that
Part of that is because
For perhaps something more like what you were looking for, you might want to read Ten Top Traps in C# for C++ Programmers [ondotnet.com].
Re:This is hardly news... (Score:2, Interesting)
You also don't address the *use*
What is the problem that
My interpretation is basically that they've gotten a new language, and they are changing all their other languages to be like it. IMHO, NOT a good idea. Why use perl.NET if the only difference between it and VB.NET is the way you for a "for" loop? I would've been better impressed if
Ta.