iPAQ 3800 In Photos 77
okiwan points to this review of the H3800, the newest rev of the handheld iPAQs, writing "New pics of the ipaq 38xx. hella neat." The photos also give a good size comparison to other handhelds, including ones you may not have heard of before.
iPAQ 3800 (Score:1)
Re:iPAQ 3800 (Score:2)
iPAQ + Linux (Score:1)
Ciryon
"This is perfect for traveling"? (Score:2, Insightful)
The winner of the PDA game will be the one who finds a way to do without:
Re:"This is perfect for traveling"? (Score:3, Informative)
Think of Bluetooth as USB without wires. Ignore the hypemeisters who want to use it to deliver locale-enhanced portal services, or whatever it is they're trying to sell now.
If Bluetooth succeeds, it will be as a cable replacement first.
Re:"This is perfect for traveling"? (Score:2)
Re:"This is perfect for traveling"? (Score:2)
Yes!! (Score:1)
Re:What about Palm? (Score:1)
I sync it with my laptop with the IR port, and the batteries last months w/o recharging so I already travel cable-less.
It doesn't run Linux, or play Mp3s.
I admit, as someone who travels for a living, and relies heavily on my Palm for business use, I don't understand what the Ipaq is for. Too big to carry in your pocket, too small to replace my laptop.
Linux on these things: (Score:3, Informative)
If they can only make installation a bit easier...
Re:Linux on these things: (Score:2, Interesting)
Dont worry about the installation part... The new bootloader (2.16.x) had dual boot (wince+linux) capability!! It is still in testing, and installing it is not reccomended for atleast another weak...
But just imagine how many more people are going to install linux after the dualboot is perfected!!
Re:Linux on these things: (Score:1)
Re:Linux on these things: (Score:1)
So the 16MB flash can be used for wince, and linux can be stored on the CF card. i think 64 MB CF card will be quite adequate for most purposes.
Re:Linux on these things: (Score:3, Interesting)
I bought my H3660 from such a third-party vendor, and the default GNU/Linux + QPE installation is really usable.
Re:Linux on these things: (Score:2)
Great distribution. But the installation goes through a serial port boot loader and it takes a lot of manual intervention and patience. One can only hope that Compaq will either start shipping iPaq's with Linux or that there will be at least a "one click" installation from CompactFlash.
Qt/Embedded claims are misleading (Score:2, Informative)
Just make sure you understand that many of the claims they make are misleading:
In reality, Qt/Embedded uses about as much RAM and ROM as a handheld X11 installation and there is no noticeable difference in performance on modern handhelds. X11 provides both anti-aliased fonts and alpha-blending. X11 also has ClearType-like subpixel addressing, support for multiple toolkits, and network transparency in both directions, features notably absent from Qt/Embedded.
Re:Very nice, but... (Score:1)
And why on *earth* would you want to do something as silly as that??
</me shudders...>
And I thought people who crammed linux on iPAQs were masochistic...
You're really thinking of breaking new ground, aren't ya
Re:Very nice, but... (Score:1)
And you would want to do this because...?
Seriously though, let's not have full blown desktop OSs running on palmtop devices. Running Linux on them is cool, but do we really need X to provide the gui (I'm thinking of the Agenda here). They're not even much use as portable X terminals as the displays are too small.
Whatever happened to QNX on the iPaq [slashdot.org]? I thought that looked quite promising.
On a different note, if some useful *nix doesn't appear for my Jornada 720 soon, I might just have to sell it and get one of these iPaqs ^_^
Re:Very nice, but... (Score:1)
Personally, I'm waiting until after Xmas, when retailers are DYING to rid themselves of product.
Thanks,
-Craig
ICQ 52356950
hmm (Score:5, Funny)
Whenever I see the phrase "hella neat," all I can think is "What? Hello Kitty? Huh?"
That aside, the iPaq is pretty sexy - and a good device, if your tastes run that way. Me, all I want is everything my Palm IIIxe (still the best Palm-made PalmOS device out there) gives me - addresses, calendar, Rogue, and RTF word processing. (rock on, Palm Portable Keyboard!)
The only new device I've seriously considered is the ravishingly sexy HandEra 330 [handera.com]. Yee-ow.
Oh no, here come the PocketPC users, eeeee....
Re:hmm (Score:1)
Read The Freakin' word processing? What the heck does that mean?
Re:hmm (Score:1)
Bwaha. Yes, that's exactly what I meant.
Not something more rational like, say, rich-text formatting....
What I'm looking for: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:What I'm looking for: (Score:1)
Thumbing - Keyboards (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Thumbing - Keyboards (Score:1)
-- Shrink the standard QWERTY keyboard, and wait 10,000 years for us to develop super skilly thumbs
-- Cell-phone style keypads. This is great if you like hitting the same key 1-3 times per character.
Why not make a, say, 32-ish key pad. 13 (x2) for characters, 10 for nums, plus enter, meta keys, etc. Set it up 6x5 plus 2 on the side/bottom.
OK then, now that this is archived, I'm off to fill out my patent applications. [uspto.gov]
Re:Thumbing - Keyboards (Score:2)
In that sense, QWERTY is perfect for 2 thumb typing, alternating between hands is the quickest way to type on a device that you have to hold onto with the same 2 hands!
How is this beter than the 3700? (Score:4, Insightful)
- The SD slot. btw, did you know that SD means Secure Digital -- All the Secure media problems come with it. And, it would not work with linux because the specs are not available
- Better display - 16 bit instead of 12 bit display. This is really not worth it unless all you want this for is watching movies. You wouldnt notice it in day to day use, and even in games.
I feel the 3700 seems a better bet right now, specially with X-scale to be released middle of 2002.
Re:How is this beter than the 3700? (Score:2)
BTW, the MMC interface is quite simple; it's the kind of interface you could build in a second EE course on design with microcontrollers. Much simpler design than CF.
Re:How is this beter than the 3700? (Score:2)
Of course, if the "secure" part relies on keys that get embedded in software somewhere, then that needs to be kept secret. But, then, someone will reverse engineer it pretty soon anyway.
Re:How is this beter than the 3700? (Score:1)
Re:How is this beter than the 3700? (Score:1)
12bit huh. (Score:2)
-Jon
What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm waiting for someone to bring out a PDA and mobile phone combined...but wait - not in the style of the Nokia communicator or many of the hybrids (although the 9210 is a nice bit of kit, which is what I use at the moment). I want the GSM technology to be built into the palm sized device, but I want a pen sized/shaped unit to use as the phone component. Communication between the phone component and the base phone could be done via buetooth. Much the way the ericsson headsets operate now - with headset -> PDA instead of headset -> mobile phone.
Also I would expect such a device to have voice recognition, so calls can be made entirely with the headset, without having to pull up the PDA to specify the call details.
Another thing that of course makes or breaks PDAs is the syncronisation software - there is no excuse for sloppy code here - and I really think that this is one area that Nokia haven't done so well with their communicators. I have about 1500 contacts, but once I start trying to syncronise more than about 900 it becomes unbearably slow. come on - why aren't the contact databases transferred as a file to the PC, syncronised on the PC, and thne the files should be transferred back - the PC is vastly more powerful than the device, so it should be doing the donkey work!
I think that the iPAQ's have fairly good syncronisation software though (AvantGO is quite impressive I understand), and this is a point that anyone else developing a PDA needs to bear in mind. the PC interface matters!Bah - just a few random(ish) thoughts anyway...
-- Pete.
Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:1)
Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:3, Informative)
There's also a provision for an earpiece, but I suspect it's one of those el-cheapo crappy ones. I hope someone will write a Bluetooth driver that lets me use, say the Ericsson Bluetooth headset (as seen in Tomb Raider) to talk on the GSM phone.
The iPaq also has IBM ViaVoice for voice recognition.
Not quite what you're after, but close.
Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:1)
a) voice recognition
b) sound quality
c) battery life in both the "ear piece" and the unit
d) sync-capability
e) ergonomics (ease of use issues)
Will get my and everyone elses $$. For something with these capabilities I think that it would be reasonable to pay (and I will gladly pay) $1200.00
At that price though, I'd want transcribing software and an MP3 recorder/player.
*drool*
What sucks is I know I'll have to wait at least 7 years for this to get to production.. *sigh*
Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:1)
Treo: Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:2)
It's the first PDA-phone I've seen that isn't overly PDA-ish with a phone tacked on (Visorphone) or a phone with a PDA stuffed in (Nokia Communicator, various Qualcomm and Samsung entries).
Re:Treo: Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:1)
Hmm, I wouldn't say that I'm married to Microsoft...the Nokia 9210 communicator I use now is based on the SymbianOS (crystal).
I looked at the Treo on the web a couple of days ago. It's not for me though - I can't see anything it offers (except maybe a little size and a touch screen) that I don't already have on my existing phone - and the screen is certainly inferior. Also it's still a device that you have to hold to make calls. I'd love to see the headset get seperated from the main unit once and for all.
However, when I said "pen sized/shaped" in my original comment, I was referring to a fairly chunky pen - I'm not expecting to have a bic biro sized handset just yet! I don't see why something the size of a largish fountain pen should be too much trouble though.
-- Pete.
Re:What I'm waiting for in a PDA... (Score:1)
What would you bring on a Desert Island..... (Score:2, Interesting)
The new iPAQ has this awesome GSM/GPRS mobile phone sleeve, which makes a fully functional Windows CE/PocketPC 2002 organiser and all that *that* allows, plus full GSM, SMS from the sleeve (with a stumpy little aerial at the top).
So while the 560 series was looking cool for a few weeks, the iPAQ can whoopass as a Nokia Communicator beater now, for around the same price. Also, they are releasing a dual PCMCIA adaptor so you could conceivable have the mother-of-all gadgets with a GPS, GSM and 2GB Microdrive with 5 movies and loads of MP3s.
Check Compaq's site for the details on the GSM/GPRS attachment (yes there is a PCMCIA solution from Nokia, but this new one is really really slick because it's built into the sleeve).
HP and Compaq PocketPCs? (Score:1)
Oops, took the wrong pill this morning...
For you Java programmers ... (Score:1, Interesting)
Older iPaqs = good prices? (Score:2)
I always find the best prices for old hardware come out a month or two after the new hardware comes out. Oh, and has anyone gotten Pocket PC 2/Linux running on one of the black and white machines yet?
Too bulky? (Score:1)
I'm not a big fan of having a bulge in my front jeans pocket, especially when I've got my mobile phone and car keys as well.
I just wish they'd slim it down a bit, and shave a few centimeters from the length, while still having it somewhat rugged.
I'm whining, I know.
Re:Too bulky? (Score:2)
"I'm not a big fan of having a bulge in my front jeans pocket, especially when I've got my mobile phone and car keys as well"
Yea! Same here... but for some reason I have been getting a hella lot of dates lately....
Nice, but not killer (Score:3, Informative)
Smaller than the iPaq, yet same power and features (64Mb). Built-in CFII + MMC/SD card slots, no need for bulky add-on ugly black plastic crap for ipaq, thank you very much. Can even run 1G IBM microdrive with 'extra' power saving options specifically aim for it.
Get a WinTV VCR, automate an MPEG4 compression to approatie screen res (320*240>), copy to your 1G microdrive and watch your program on the road. Ok, iPaq can do that, but you have to shell out a hundred bucks for the plack plastic expansion first!
64Mb of 64kbit WMA is good enough while you're travelling, a 32/64Mb MMC card gives you plenty musical enjoyment too!
All in the same tiny shell, now beat that for the same/cheaper price than the iPaq
humps
Re:Nice, but not killer (Score:2)
Uninterested, thanks to Yahoo... (Score:1)
Productivity? (Score:1)
they're huge! (Score:1, Informative)
the Palm V is just about small enough, but these lunkers? no way.