
IgNobel Awards 95
how_would_i_know writes: "I've always suspected there was a coconut conspiracy... now there's proof. :-)" We might as well follow-up on our earlier story with a list of the IgNobel Winners. Stalin World! A study of glee! And of course, a true breakthrough, the solution to the shower curtain mystery.
The Shower Question? (Score:1)
Good to see the great mystery in life are always being pondered. Now lets try and figure out Dick Clarks true age.
Patented the WHAT?! (Score:5, Funny)
I'll patent the wheel composed of a high number
of flat sides arranged as a regular polygon.
That'll get him....
Re:Patented the WHAT?! (Score:1)
Bumpy on the flat, but fairly smooth on a corderoy road with the right size logs.
Re:Patented the WHAT?! (Score:1)
Oh, there must be a prior art.
Truly comic touch (Score:3, Funny)
"Don't reinvent the wheel. Searching worldwide patent information can help you avoid wasting time and money duplicating work done elsewhere"
(from here [ipaustralia.gov.au])
Re:Truly comic touch (Score:2)
You would think they would give some thought to non-patented prior art too. Next thing you know, they'll let someone patent communications satellites... 8-)
Re:Patented the WHAT?! (Score:1)
You do realise that it would wear round very quickly.
SQUARE wheels (Score:4, Funny)
No, really. A square wheel will ride over a surface made of a series of half-circles (think: one long string of speedbumps) as if it were a round wheel going across a flat surface.
Square wheels are not as good as round wheels. (Score:1)
Alternate address for results... (Score:5, Informative)
...and try this address for winners...
http://www.improb.com/ig/ig-2001-winners.html [improb.com]
Oh, so that's what it's calld.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh, so that's what it's calld.... (Score:1)
Welcome to the unfunnest place on earth!
2.5 percent of injuries... (Score:2, Funny)
This is a preventable accident, and measures should be taken to halt these needless coconut injuries!
Black Holes (Score:1)
Great so judjing by the article Bill Gates now has a mnopoly to black holes too.
Oh dear god! (Score:1)
We must move immediately to protect our children from the perils of falling coconuts! I hereby propose a law requiring saftey fencing at least ten feet larger in diameter of any tree bearing coconuts or similar fruits. Any owner of such a tree will blah, blah, blah...
</sarcasm>
Ok, if he can patent the wheel, I'm going to patent the use of "<sarcasm/>" notation to prevent the
Funniest statement in the article (Score:4, Funny)
Gosh, how insightful! Never in a million years would I have known that group glee cannot happen when you're alone!
really? (Score:1)
So, who were you with, Saturday October 06, @12:23AM?
You've never seen a kid watch Barney then (Score:2)
Anyone else thinks... (Score:2, Insightful)
Bleah, maybe the guy who managed that just wanted to be funny, but I find it rather chilling myself...
Re:Anyone else thinks... (Score:4, Informative)
Does US5443036: Method of exercising a cat [delphion.com] qualify? (IIRC, this won an IgNobel in a previous year)
Abstract:
A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of invisible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall or other opaque surface in the vicinity of the cat, then moving the laser so as to cause the bright pattern of light to move in an irregular way fascinating to cats, and to any other animal with a chase instinct.
Re:Anyone else thinks... (Score:1)
In that case I would like to file this patent...
A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of visible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall
Science History (Score:5, Funny)
To test them, knowing that adult's might be too polite to be honest or too dignified to participate, he gathered together a group of children. The test's were held in a shower to handle any accidents that might result from forced farting. It worked brilliantly. The children tried them in turn's, and not an unpleasant whiff escaped.
For a final test, Stalin tried them on himself and stepped into the shower and strained with all his strength. Unfortunately, his mighty blast destabilized the black hole, causing him and the shower curtain to be sucked into it. At first thinking it all part of the fun, the children were overjoyed at the spectacle.
He was awarded an Ig Nobel Prize posthumously, though this is likely no consolation as he is presumed to live in an eternal hell of contained fart's.
(I swear it sounded like a good idea when I started writing...)
Damn! (Score:2)
Re:Science History (Score:1)
The test's were held in a shower to handle any accidents that might result from forced farting. It worked brilliantly. The children tried them in turn's, and not an unpleasant whiff escaped.
Aww, look at this post. You have completely butchered the use of the apostrophe. You forgot the poor englishman who runs the Apostrophe Protection Society. He got the literature award and would be horrified by your post. Is that a coincidence? Hmmm...
Where's GrammarNazi when you need him?
BTW, I actually attended the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony, and it was hilarious. I would highly recommend anyone in the Cambridge/Boston area attend next year if at all possible.
Re:Science History (Score:1)
Not being in the area, I watched the live webcast. There were definitely some excellent parts. I think the webcast left a lot to be desired, but what can I expect for free? I'm sure actually being there is 10 times better.
Re:Science History (Score:1)
Sounds like he would have rated a Darwin [darwinawards.com] as well.
Re:Science History (Score:2, Funny)
Simple answer (Score:1)
Re:Simple answer [Ich bin schmutzig!] (Score:1)
Re:Simple answer (Score:3, Insightful)
....dogh!!
Re:Simple answer, but wrong (Score:1)
I am forced to quote a teacher I had once... (Score:1)
Spiritual Remains
Shower Curtain Prior Art (Score:4, Funny)
OK, where the hell is my grant???
Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art (Score:2)
But also, if we used your suggestion then we would get water all over the floor. The whole point of the shower curtain is to keep water from getting on the floor. Moisture hurts the furniture and perhaps the floor. And wettness increases the your risk of falling when you get out.
What I do is use a blow drier to negate the inward forces. With my method there is far less risk of getting the floor wet but the noise may bother some people.
Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art (Score:4, Funny)
In addition to keeping the shower curtain where it belongs, this also forces me to take quick showers, because of CO2 poisoning if I'm in there for more than 7 minutes.
I've thus, killed 2 birds with one stone (or roll of duct tape). Extra benefits are mastery of the 6 1/2 minute shower and being able to shave afterwards while still dizzy.
Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art (Score:1)
It's a lot easier just to stick weights to the bottom of your shower curtain. Here (Ireland) the more expensive shower curtains have folded over hems at the bottom with small weights sewn in. Problem solved - weights are heavy enough to pull curtain flat. You just need to have a firmly attached curtain rail, since the curtain is obviously significantly heavier with weights in.
Even better (Score:1)
Re:Even better (Score:1)
Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art (Score:1)
Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art (Score:1)
If you're in a standup shower, direct it so that the curtain gets hit when it blows it.
but what about the... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:but what about the... (Score:2)
Yes, generally things that beat a nice large anvil are, in fact, hitting a nice large anvil.
The prize for literature should have been shared! (Score:1)
The shameful misuse [angryflower.com] of the apostrophe is being fought [angryflower.com] by others [angryflower.com] as well.
Bob must be ... um ... more irate!
Everyone should read Bob The Angry Flower (Score:1)
Turn off scripting before you read the results (Score:2)
Dr Jack Impe and Rexella (Score:1)
bleh, rejected (Score:1, Offtopic)
Now give me credit, damnit!
A physics question (really) (Score:2)
He had an astronomer relative calculate the force after seeing victims arrive at the hospital where he worked in Papua New Guinea.
How exactly do you calculate something like this? I'm one of those geeks who remember just enough physics to be confused. It seems to me that the force is dependent on the mass of the coconut and its acelleration, which is determined by the rigidity of what is being hit (e.g. a steel plate vs. a foam mat).
It also seems to me that as devestating as a coconut impact might be, it would not be as reliably deadly as carefully placing over two thousand pounds on somebody's head.
Re:A physics question (really) (Score:2)
Certainly a coconut is less reliable, but I don't recall anyone suggesting they use this research for assassination.
Re:A physics question (really) (Score:1)
Re:A physics question (really) (Score:1)
Have a helping of math. (Score:2)
And our unfortunate victim's head is 1.5m off the ground (thus making the distance the coconut falls 33.5m.
After having falling 33.5m, the coconut will be moving at sqrt(2*9.8*33.5), or 25.6 m/s.
If the person's head stops the coconut instantly, the deceleration will be infinite, meaning infinite force. Let's hope this is the case, because our hapless victim will likely die too quickly to feel the pain.
Sadly, the world does not work this way, so let's assume it takes 1/2 cm for the coconut to fully decelerate after hitting his/her head. (It's a soft head.)
Using the equation used above, v^2 = v0^2 + 2a(x - x0), we know that the acceleration will be 656.6m/s/s.
With a 1 kg coconut, that means 656.6 newtons of force into your head. And that's assuming you have a truly soft head.
Free Ignobel Lectures (Score:2)
The IG INFORMAL LECTURES will beheld at MIT room 26-100 on Saturday, October 6, 1 pm.
A half-afternoon of improbably funny, informative, brief (10-15 minutes each), high-spirited public lectures:
A follow-up to a follow-up. Niiice. (Score:2)
Enough with the "shower curtain" stories, Michael. You yourself originally posted the same story back in July [slashdot.org]. Out of the hundreds of submissions for stories given to Slashdot, you picked this one? Come on..
Cheers,
Is Hell exothermic or endothermic (Score:1, Funny)
>The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington
>Chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so "profound" that the
>professor shared it with his colleagues. Bonus Question: Is Hell
>exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)? Most of the
>students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools off
>when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some variant. One
>student, however, wrote the following: First, we need to know how the
>mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate that souls
>are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can
>safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore,
>no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, lets look
>at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these
>religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will
>go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since
>people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all
>souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect
>the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the
>rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in
>order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the
>volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added. This
>gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the
>rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell
>will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a
>rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and
>pressure will drop until Hell freezes over. So which is it? If we accept
>the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year, "that it will
>be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the
>fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her,
>then, #2 cannot be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and
>will not freeze. The student received the only "A."
ADA (Score:1)
The Australian sense of humor (Score:2, Funny)
"Don't reinvent the wheel. Searching worldwide patent information can help you avoid wasting time and money duplicating work done elsewhere."
To heck with patenting the wheel... (Score:3, Funny)
Claim 1: A process for the production of heat by the chemical combination of oxygen with solid, liquid, or gaseous substances.
Claim 2: The reduction in volume or weight of waste material by chemical combination with oxygen.
Re:To heck with patenting the wheel... (Score:1)
Damn! I was about to post that.
I was going to make Claim 1 (heat), I didn't think of Claim 2 (reduction of waste material), but I can still patent this claim:
Claim 3: A process for the production of visible radiation via the oxidation of a suitable substrate. The vital feature being that said substrate enters the process in a favorable energy state and exits in a depleted energy state.
Additionally this process has the advantagous properties of being continous and self sustaining as long as both reactants (oxygen and substrate) are present.
Stalin World Article (Score:2)
Re:Stalin World Article (Score:1)
cold showers and the chimney effect (Score:1)
Water is wet. Really. You can go check if you want.
Now the funny thing about all this wet stuff all over the inside of the shower is that water vapor (H2O) is lighter than air (N2, O2, etc.). Yes, H2O (molecular weight of 2*1+16=18) is about 36% lighter than N2, O2 (molecular weight of 2*14=28, 2*16=32 etc.) This fact is well known by pilots, who have to deal with less lift when flying over large bodies of water and such. I, for one, dismiss the "tornado" theory based on the fact that the shower curtain still pulls in when the shower is hitting my head.
You know funny about that shower curtain mystery.. (Score:2)
I tried the cold shower thing, and the curtain only moved inwards slightly. Not nearly as much as with a hot shower.
And after the water was turned off, the curtains were STILL pulled inwards. As soon as I opened the side a little (to let the air mix) they immediately stopped pulling inwards (hence it would appear to be a temperature difference, not a mysterious mini cyclone effect)
Anyone else tried it?
Shower curtain project (Score:1)
"Cannot, or should not, be reproduced" (Score:2)
Oh, and if you visit New Guinea and there's a storm -- don't take shelter beneath a palm tree.