Geek Flavor 155
snowphoton told us to check out http://www.geekflavor.com. "It seems to be an 'open source' Web site, in that people are allowed to ftp anything they want to the site, or use ssh to modify the contents." I took a quick look at this, and it looks like a really cool net experiment. The word 'geek' is getting kind of over-used (CT:KIND of overused! Sheesh), but this seems like a lot of fun, and a nifty way to waste time when you should really be working.
You have obviously not been to the movies lately.. (Score:2)
Vermifax
Excuse me... (Score:1)
Re:The true spirit of mass human communication? (Score:1)
On another level, "The hedgehog's dilemma" is another condition that impairs human contact. 2 hedgehogs try to approach each other, and the closer they get, the more they hurt each other. So they stay far away from others for fear of getting hurt, sound familiar?
wow (Score:1)
It didn't last long (Score:1)
Let take it back from script kiddies!!!
^--- Mod Parent Up!.. (Score:1)
Yet another example of how bad the moderation system works. Some idiot rated this "Overrated" when it wan't even rated... Taco, you should fix this. If a post hasn't been mod:ed it shouldn't be possible to mod it over/under-rated.
Thank you.
//Frisco
--
"No se rinde el gallo rojo, sólo cuando ya está muerto."
Re:Structure/Free For All (Score:2)
Says quite a lot, unfortunately, about your average Slashdotter. :(
Re:Message from the Admin (repost) (Score:2)
Re: Here's the text of index.html (Score:1)
Am I the first to modify this? -Sean
Hey, look at me, I'm famous (-:
I figured the index.html file was uneditable because nobody else had modded it yet, and it turns out that I'm not a lame first poster. And I didn't even think of it that way (-:
Text picture of Tux (Score:1)
Re:It didn't last long (Score:1)
Re:I hate to be a wet blanket... (Score:1)
What a way to go, virtually ensuring the isps box gets rootkitted...
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:1)
Now, $5 to the first person who figures out what program's sourcecode was used for the text
-- Sig, 120 chars --
Your friendly neighborhood mIRC scripter.
if (ismoderator(reader)) hidecomment(this);
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:1)
-- Sig, 120 chars --
Your friendly neighborhood mIRC scripter.
if (ismoderator(reader)) hidecomment(this);
Re:crowley-it-rhymes-with-holy dept. (Score:1)
using it the way that Crowley was.
Not that it matters much.
Re:MetaBaby (Score:1)
Wrong choice of servers (Score:1)
I have something to say about all this:
If you're going to open a server to the world, at least use your own server.
A little bit of research revealed that this server probably belongs to an ISP and and snowphoton (who submitted the URL to /. in the first place and who is also the administrative, technical, and billing contact for geekflavor.com) is not likely to be in a position of authority at that ISP. Therefore, he/she/it should not have opened the server to us.
How do I know that the server is most likely owned by an ISP? Because it is hosting sites for multiple domains. www.messagerieradidex.com is at the same IP address as www.geekflavor.com.
How do I know that snowphoton is not somebody at the ISP that would be allowed to do whatever he/she/it wants? The ISP in question (WebHosting.com) is in Toronto, ON, CA. Snowphoton is in Mesa, AZ, US. That's a long commute.
Now, even is snowphoton happens to own WebHosting.com, he/she/it should never be so reckless with a server that hosts multiple customers' sites.
Re:Another Idea for Keeping the Page Up... (Score:1)
Re:It didn't last long (Score:1)
Emmett had to know this would happen when he posted the story... way to go Emmet, very resonsible of you
Hmmm.. (Score:3)
I'm specifically worrying about Signal:Noise ratios and illegal content...
Geekflavor NOT so cool (Score:1)
Cute (Score:1)
Re:Danger Will Robinson! (Score:1)
Format (Score:1)
Simply place all html files in the /htdocs directory, and cgi scripts in the /cgi-bin directory.
What is somebody wants to put a 'format c:' script in there or something else very malicious. What's then?
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:1)
I wrote something similar in C (that interfaces with convert; I didn't write any *real* image code if you're wondering
A later version attempted to do sub-pixel anti-aliasing, and optimizing for size by ignoring close colors, but it wasn't incredibly successful. Also, I could probably rewrite the whole thing in Perl now, and it'd be tiny. (and then backport it to C again if I need the speed.
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [ncsu.edu].
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:1)
Re:Humans get along remarkably well (Score:1)
Real cool idea .. (Score:1)
I love the idea of content management going free for all... but considering that we are in a society where freedom does not necessarily lead to productive activities.. how will someone like geekflav keep the sanity of the site
I mean you wouldnt want someone to change links to point to useless (read porno, other undesirable ) links
Does anyone have a clue ?
-/r
Could this really work? (Score:1)
try a wiki (Score:1)
For a more open freeforall on the web, try playing around with a wiki:
http://www.joyful.com/zwiki/ [joyful.com]or the original:
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki [c2.com]
Re:Cute (Score:1)
geekflavor.com, where's the beef? (Score:1)
Webhost (Score:1)
Re:Another Idea for Keeping the Page Up... (Score:1)
is it still up? (Score:1)
Re:Message from the Admin (repost) (Score:1)
However, I was going to do it on my own machine, the second one which I have and which is pretty open to potential destruction.
The idea, however, was not to 'open source' it. I'd read a long time ago (back in '92, probably in the book 'Hackers') that rms fundamentally opposed the idea of introducing passwords into the MIT AI lab. I knew that doing this under the current circumstances would result in major destruction (it's always easier to tear down than to construct), but I wanted to see what would happen anyways. I wanted to see what would _eventually_ come about. It _is_ a great experiment. The box will be trashed initially, but what would happen _eventually_? Would the constructors get in eventually and build-up the necessary walls against the destructors? Would the forces of light prevail? A communal space on the Net?
It'll be another 2 months before I'll be back in Toronto. I do hope that someone else wil give this a try in the mean time.
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already--solution? (Score:2)
No. There exists a solution! The basic idea is to give the people who want to use it the means to observe what others are doing and to secure the system against abuse.
In fact, that is exactly what people did in the ``good old days'' in the AI lab before ``strict security'' was built into systems as a standard.
In a lecture [gnu.org] about the history of GNU, RMS even complains about the use of passwords and "strict security". He writes about people damaging the system by accident and about outsiders using MITs computers:
On ITS [the old, anarchist Incompatible Timesharing System -- Yaakov] we evolved other means of discouraging people from doing those things by accident, but on Twenex [the new "secure" system -- Yaakov] you didn't have them because they assumed that there was going to be be strict security in effect and only the bosses were going to have the power to do them. So they didn't put in any other mechanism to make it hard to do by accident.
Maybe we can reconstruct some of the features that the AI lab used to secure ``tourism''? Maybe we can develop new mechanisms?
Of course, nowadays the job is harder than it was. Now, more people have just bad intentions and the ability to act anonymously and fast. Worse, the ``save tourism'' features haven't been developed for a long time.
Here are some suggestions how ``save tourism'' could be revived.
The following features would give a responsible person an advantage over intruders: First, allow spying what others do and save logs on another server where they can be read but not destroyed.
Second, create alerts and delays when important files are changed: Say, the changes take effect only after ten minutes during which observers have the right to veto the change. Once one person vetos another one, a trusted person can override the veto if it is not a matter of an attack.
This policy would not stop legitimate users from working with and improving the system. But an attacker would be noticed before he can take over control.
A third feature would be to back-up data on a safe account (which just serves the files) so that an original state can be rebuilt quickly after an attack.
One way to combine these features would be to request users to keep their sources and configurations on another (their own) WWW server. 10 Minutes after they notify the free system about changes, the changes are downloaded and installed. Checksums of the installation are stored safely so that the same files can be re-installed without delay when the user wants to roll back.
Finally, we would need some distributed system of trust such that a person can loose his reputation by attacking the system or recommending attackers to be trusted. Here, the PGP trust system springs to mind.
Any more ideas?
Yaakov
Re:Danger Will Robinson! (Score:2)
you can get more information on hotline at http://www.hotlinesw.com or http://www.bigredh.com
used primarily for pirating. created by a teenage australian, but then he got in a shady deal with a canadian co. (that now owns the product) and there was a huge legal battle, rumors of his sister being kidnapped, and the original programmer on the run.
Cracked? (Score:2)
Christopher A. Bohn
Re:his own machine? (Score:1)
err, well if it's a standalone box at his ISP (which I what I'm assuming), all they have to do is unplug it from the network and reinstall an OS or something. I would assume that any ISP worth their beans has ways to defend against damage to the rest of their network caused by a rogue box.
It would be different if it were a shared server, which can't be the case because then he wouldn't have been able to give access to everyone.
but it seems more likely to me that it's HIS box at HIS home and he's simply got a high bandwidth connection or something.
Shame. Slashdotting is a bad thing. (Score:1)
This site has sat there for a while. And then it was slashdotted. Some moron has put a huge text file of a penguin up. Great, fly the mascot and show that the Linux community is a collection of script kiddies and lamers.
Earlier the author had replaced the index.html page that they had asked not to be removed. Which has once again vanished. All that this person's experiment has proved is that the people that frequent Slashdot aren't the wonderful people they claim to be.
Get a life guys, and read the advocacy HOWTO.
Re:Danger Will Robinson! (Score:1)
Re:Failed already (Score:1)
Re:Another Idea - Keep it open to all (Score:1)
Re:The true spirit of mass human communication? (Score:1)
$ cat < /dev/mouse
Begging for a lawsuit? (Score:1)
And they actually are hosting the files unlike Napster.
Refrag
Re:And now that somebody changed the index.html (Score:2)
Login: geekflav
Password: dnzvmsii
FTP site: ftp.geekflavor.com
It died. (Score:1)
the 7 minute long story (Score:1)
/james.
Men is inclined towards evil (Score:1)
Sad, isn't it...
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:1)
Re:Is slashdot legally responsible for this? (Score:1)
Re:Nice turn of phrase, that (Score:2)
Not a chance (Score:1)
There is no way this would have been fun or cool. People just can't be trusted with any sort of anonymous forum. I mean, moderation was invented here because of the ACs, and there are still ACs posting volumes of off-topic junk.
Anything like this would require some sort of moderation or regulation. And even then, a post on /. would probably lead to someone cracking into the system. People are jerks.
Re:his own machine? (Score:2)
sig:
Re:Cracked? (Score:1)
Please wait. Brain evolving... (Score:1)
Additional Ports? (Score:1)
3138/tcp unassigned
3306/tcp unassigned
6010/tcp unassigned
6011/tcp unassigned
These ports are open on geekflavor.com, as well as the SSH/FTP/HTTP ports.. one of them (3306) actually sends stuff to you, and reports "Bad Handshake" after you type anything in
Re:Collaborative webs are old news (Score:1)
Re:Format (Score:2)
sig:
Geekflavor (Score:1)
It's made me wonder whether hooking an old p60 of mine up to the university net connection with open acess would be like. Could be an interesting research project into the psychology of 31337 hax0r script kiddies. Just a shame I'm an electronic engineer althought that does mean I can monitor the box from a hardware level so if they trash it I can still find out how.
Re:Humans get along remarkably well (Score:1)
I would also venture to say humans have a bit more tendency to *create* things that are useful to everyone.
Let me know when the dogs finally settle on a routing protocol to get howls from Dallas to Tibet.
Re:Media destruction (Score:2)
saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaLASHDOT!
cache of index.html (Score:2)
Re:Useless, possibly interesting... (Score:1)
The only thing this says to me is; (Score:1)
Give away a site like this for free, and it'll be rooted and destroyed. How many people do you think wanted to know the connection speed for warez hosting? or shell account trading? (or mp3s or porn, what have you..)
Redundant? Perhaps. But some days I feel Slashdot's readers are so clue-resistant as to need every little redundant post beaten into their skulls.
Do you want to create a site like this? Then don't let the Slashdot crowd see it. It'll be 'hot grits!-ed' within the hour. (I refuse to say 'hax0r', My IQ is a positive integer.)
Nice Try geekflavor. I'll give you points for trying. You just got the bad fortune to be on Slashdot, the aqua regia of free geek items.
Re:Failed already (Score:1)
index.html (Score:1)
Re:Format (Score:2)
Somehow I don't think that this is even all that relevant, you ALREADY have root access. You can delete/modify anything you want.
Rami
--
10 mins and the account's disabled (Score:1)
Was it locked out or did someone just change the password? :)
===
Re:Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:1)
"Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain."
It's closed. (Score:5)
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/16) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 07:59:59...
At least you can't change the password easily
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/20) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:00:14...
Is kill -9 -1 stupid enough?
;-)
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/6) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:00:21...
well it took about 10 mins for someone to erase the index.html (spot the twit that can't read). [Mike]
Message from geekflav on vux2 (pts/21) [ Tue Jul 25 08:00:21 ]
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/13) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:00:53...
This takes me back 10 years!
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/4) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:01:03...
And I was watching top hoping to see some major slashdotting.. har when there's no page
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/26) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:01:08...
will you lot shut the fuck up!
Broadcast Message from geekflav (pts/13) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:01:22...
Nah!
Broadcast Message from ??? (pts/4) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:01:40...
root pts/18 7:57am vi
oops
Broadcast Message from ??? (pts/7) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:01:44...
Hmm, root is editing
Received disconnect: Command terminated on signal 9.
And here is some w(1) output:
8:01am up 19 day(s), 3:38, 28 users, load average: 1.27, 1.25, 0.90
User tty login@ idle JCPU PCPU what
amzmusic pts/1 10:21pm 9:26 -csh
geekflav pts/3 7:47am 1 2 -tcsh
geekflav pts/4 7:49am 16 w
geekflav pts/5 7:50am 10 -tcsh
geekflav pts/6 7:54am 1 -tcsh
geekflav pts/7 7:51am 1:06 -tcsh
geekflav pts/8 7:51am 1 2 -tcsh
geekflav pts/9 7:54am 3 more index.html
geekflav pts/10 7:53am 3 -tcsh
geekflav pts/11 7:53am 1 bash
geekflav pts/12 8:00am 1 -tcsh
geekflav pts/13 7:55am 1 wall
geekflav pts/14 7:56am -tcsh
geekflav pts/15 7:56am 2 1 -tcsh
geekflav pts/16 7:56am -tcsh
geekflav pts/17 8:00am vi index.html
root pts/18 7:57am vi
geekflav pts/19 7:57am 1 ftp ftp.bitchx.com
geekflav pts/21 7:58am 1 -tcsh
geekflav pts/20 7:58am -tcsh
geekflav pts/22 7:58am 2 -tcsh
geekflav pts/23 7:58am -tcsh
geekflav pts/24 7:59am -tcsh
geekflav pts/25 7:59am 1 -tcsh
geekflav pts/26 7:59am -tcsh
geekflav pts/27 7:59am vi index.html
geekflav pts/28 8:01am26days
geekflav pts/29 8:01am -tcsh
--
Niklas Nordebo | nino at sonox.com | +46-708-405095
The true spirit of mass human communication? (Score:1)
Humans CAN'T get along, people are impaired from helping each other, one would rather kill his friend to get the big bag of money than save his friend and get a lesser bag. I came across a site yesterday that talks about The Prisoner's Dilemma [spectacle.org] - very intresting reading about human nature. This Geekflavor incident is a clear demonstration of this, script kiddiots and e-tards working together to blast "A Good Thing"(tm) clear out of the water.
Well, on the other hand, it did come out on Slashdot...
Another Idea for Keeping the Page Up... (Score:2)
That's solved easily: any file uploaded becomes read-only.
Now, as far as deleting/editing content you've sent... Can you make a script that allows deleting of files uploaded ONLY if the IP/IP range matches between the uploaded file and the delete request?
Or, of course, you can have registered users each with their own folder. Then again, that's Geocities (or Tripod, etc.).
Bottom line, this doesn't work, and we've been proved right. Anyone else have some suggestions so this DOES work? There has to be some point in-between full/root access and Slashdot moderation/separate accounts where this can work. I'm curious to see if this, eventually, can work.
Re:Message from the Admin (repost) (Score:1)
From the Geekflavor Admin (Score:4)
I will admit that I didn't exactly idiot-proof the project. I was hoping that by giving complete control to everyone, something truly interesting might develop, but I failed to take into account the power of a single ignorant admin.
People have always used technology for destructive purposes -- the thrill of anonymity is intoxicating, and people often lose sight of their everyday code of conduct. Once little Timmy Smith because |)Ar|I never expected this project to amount to much. I just had some webspace and a domain, and decided to give it a shot. I think, though, that perhaps this experiment deserves another chance, although with a better plan on my part.
If anyone out there has some suggestions on how this "Open Source" website experiment could work better, please contact me at ibn_qalb@arabia.com [mailto] (not my usual address, if you were wondering). I'd love to have some help in creating a new, sturdier site that would actually be built to handle something like this.
Thanks everyone! It was fun while it lasted - Keep an eye out for the Alpha release!
That is cool that he opened sourced it but... (Score:2)
Danger Will Robinson! (Score:4)
Re:10 mins and the account's disabled (Score:2)
Broadcast Message from ??? (pts/7) on vux2 Tue Jul 25 08:01:44...
Hmm, root is editing
> Received disconnect: Command terminated on signal 9.
I doubt his ISP likes having people logged on anonymously.
Collaborative webs are old news (Score:5)
See, e.g., this swiki page. [gatech.edu]
Despite the skepticism, these things work very well and are rarely the subject of abuse. A sandbox is provided for people who just want to play, and folks are generally quite courteous as a matter of practice. We use one for the Squeak Smalltalk open source community, which you can access from the main (traditional) web site page for Squeak. [squeak.org]. The Swiki is one of the primary repositories of information for the Squeak community.
We have found cowebs an excellent vehicle for collaboratively creating documentation for open source projects that have run too long without doco support.. While it is not a great place to build final documents, it is a great place to gather information, and over time mold into the same.
Media destruction (Score:5)
How many times have we seen things like this on cool websites posted to Slashdot: "Well, we got mentioned on Slashdot. Sorry I have to take this down, but my bandwidth can't handle it." Pretty soon people are going to start thinking twice before even creating sites like this. Slashdot will be "stifling innovation".
--
Give us our karma back! Punish Karma Whores through meta-mod!
Ha, only 3 minutes and already (Score:2)
"r0x0r" - that's the content of the index page.
Good luck.
Hey Moderators! (Score:2)
not that new an idea (Score:3)
To set up one yourself, I recommend checking out phpwiki [sourceforge.net].
Re:Could this really work? (Score:2)
Oh, wait, what's this about GeekFlavor? I was ruminating about something else *cough* /. *cough*
Re:Hmmm.. (Score:2)
The true spirit of mass human communication? (Score:4)
Not that I in any way agree with web page defacements, but at least I can understand how taking down or modifying a secured web page that a lot of people will see has a certain publicity stunt appeal to it - defacing Seti@Home and putting your h4x0r nick on it is kind of like spraypainting your name atop the world's biggest water tower. But what does it say about human nature when the very first thing people want to do to a supposed community collaboration project is to anonymously make it unavailable to everyone else?
Here I am, always an advocate of privacy and anonymity, and yet when I see people do stuff like this it makes me want to rethink all of those positions. On the one hand I'm cynical enough to think a whole lot of people would want to nuke a site like this; on the other hand even after I've had my coffee and am no longer quite so misanthropic I realize that with total anonymity even a single idiot can ruin a lot of other people's day with total impunity.
Makes ya think...
Re: Here's the text of index.html (Score:5)
THE STORY
A while ago, I had a great website called Geekflavor, which had daily-updated geek news. It ran on perl, and recreated itself every few minutes to get the latest headlines from other sites. I tried different hosting services, however, but none of them (this one included) were very perl-friendly. So I gave up, and never got around to finding another one. Maybe one day, when I have more time....
SO WHAT?
So -- I have decided to Open Source this website! I am giving away the password and making it a free-for-all. As long as it's nothing illegal or pornographic, you can upload whatever you like. The site has got good bandwidth, so that's not a problem. All I ask is that you leave this page (index.html) intact, with the exception of adding links to additional pages (which you can do with a text editor).
HOW DO I PLAY?
Login: geekflav
Password: dnzvmsii
FTP site: ftp.geekflavor.com
Simply place all html files in the /htdocs directory, and cgi scripts in the /cgi-bin directory. Perl seems to work well, it's just that my site relied on crontab, which was disabled by the admins.
Shell access is also available, but you have to use SSH software (i.e., you can't just telnet to Geekflavor.com). Try PenguiNet -- It's my client of choice. This is useful for editing existing files (such as adding links from this page to other pages), and tweaking scripts.
RULES
Since it's a free-for-all, nothing is really sacred. Anyone can modify anything that has been uploaded by anyone else. This is meant to be creative and productive, however, rather than destructive. I hope that this site will grow and evolve in an interesting way, rather than simply serving as a giant spamwad. Also, I ask that you leave this text intact for the benefit of others.
Have fun!
[feel free to add anything below this line, such as links to uploaded pages, etc.]
Am I the first to modify this? -Sean
Before it becomes too much of a free for all -Mike
Hot grits rule - Andy
www.cyberia200o.org : cyberia : sub-dir on www.geekflavor.com
MetaBaby (Score:2)
It was nominated for a Webby Award [webbyawards.com] last year for best personal site. Slashdot was nominated (and won People's Choice) for Community.
Structure/Free For All (Score:2)
I think this is a very interesting experiment in how much freedom you can give people. Everybody would like to be part of a collective (like this site) where the structure is completely bottom-up and decentralized and everybody has a say, in fact a major say, in everything. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work too well. There will always be the people who for one reason or another would like to mess it up, and because of the lack of structure, can and will do so.
I guess the reason I'm bringing this up is because this whole concept, the struggle between structure and freedom seems to come up again and again in the computer world. Should software design be centralized or Open Source? Should the Internet have laws? Who decides the structure of the Internet/should there be a structure? It seems to me that any system that has no organization or constraints (like this site) will fail. It seems pretty much inevitable that there will always be the few (or sometimes the majority) who will mess up the spirit and the workings of the project because of spite, carelessness, or greed. That's why although institutions like ICANN need major changes, they are still damn important. Let's not forget that the Internet *does* have structure, and it is this structure (some centralization of naming, routing, etc) that has allowed it to grow to the amazing extent that it has.
Flavor ? (Score:2)
I hate to be a wet blanket... (Score:2)
That said, I'd love to see the looks on the faces of the admins right about now, assuming they don't read slashdot.
---
Where can the word be found, where can the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence.
Sounds familiar. (Score:2)
You're right one one count at least (Score:2)
In this case giving away Your account info is just plain dumb. With several hundreds if people uploading whatever they want, giving away the addy for friends, or linking or whatever, and the next guy deleting the files, overwriting them or something else. Nah... This will never work....
Even geeks will goof it...
his own machine? (Score:2)
I am guessing this webhost will be extremely angry at this for having their machine broken into (by some accounts people who sshed in got root, yes?) and possibly try to burn him for violating their terms if they included anything to cover this.
I am not sure if he did it intentionally, but if you were some guy who was mad at you host cause they didn't let you use cron, what better way to get back at them than just running a shell account guaranteed to attract crackers and script kiddies?
So, basically I don't feel sorry for this guy at all. He didn't have any important files he lost or anything, but the workers at his webhost are now going to have to clean up a box because some jackass gave shell access to the readership of slashdot. I would imagine that would be any security team's nightmare, no matter how well they had applied all the latest security patches.
sig:
Message from the Admin (repost) (Score:5)
---------
I'm the guy who did this GeekFlavor thing, and I have to say that I'm very disappointed in how it turned out. It wasn't up for very long at all before some script kiddie had to bust some 1337 moves on it.
I will admit that I didn't exactly idiot-proof the project. I was hoping that by giving complete control to everyone, something truly interesting might develop, but I failed to take into account the power of a single ignorant admin.
People have always used technology for destructive purposes -- the thrill of anonymity is intoxicating, and people often lose sight of their everyday code of conduct. Once little Timmy Smith because |)Ar|I never expected this project to amount to much. I just had some webspace and a domain, and decided to give it a shot. I think, though, that perhaps this experiment deserves another chance, although with a better plan on my part.
If anyone out there has some suggestions on how this "Open Source" website experiment could work better, please contact me at ibn_qalb@arabia.com [mailto] (not my usual address, if you were wondering). I'd love to have some help in creating a new, sturdier site that would actually be built to handle something like this.
Useless, possibly interesting... (Score:2)
Here are the top referrers to the site. You can get all these stats by going to geekflavor.com/stats [geekflavor.com]. Oh, and although ssh is apparently down, ftp is still up.
Top 23 of 35 Total Referrers
# Hits Referrer
1 954 36.82% - (Direct Request)
2 28 1.08% http://slashdot.org/article.pl
3 8 0.31% http://cgi.zdnet.com/zdpoll/savevote.html
4 7 0.27% http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3
5 6 0.23% http://www.nerdperfect.com/
6 5 0.19% http://slashdot.org/yro/00/05/31/1534236.shtml
7 4 0.15% http://slashdot.org/articles/00/07/21/1422251.shtm l
8 2 0.08% http://arcanum.simplenet.com/links.html
9 2 0.08% http://slashdot.org/submit.pl
10 2 0.08% http://slashdot.org/comments.pl
11 2 0.08% http://slashdot.org/interviews/00/05/23/007214.sht ml
12 2 0.08% bookmarks
13 2 0.08% http://slashdot.org/askslashdot/00/07/15/2030252.s html
14 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/apache/00/05/22/1858206.shtml
15 1 0.04% news://news.sprint.ca/397CFD3F.5FE204BA@metallicaf an.com
16 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/17/2136258.shtm l
17 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/index.pl
18 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/askslashdot/00/05/09/0131249.s html
19 1 0.04% http://www.greatdomains.com/domains/details.asp
20 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/science/00/05/04/0816244.shtml
21 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/articles/00/07/24/1617240.shtm l
22 1 0.04% http://www.zdnet.com/gamespot/filters/
23 1 0.04% http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/22/1345215.shtm l
Hrmmm...Lost Some Text (Score:2)
Humans get along remarkably well (Score:5)
I understand the point of and the lamentation in your post. However, I heard an anthropologist point out an interesting fact, how well humans do get along, better than most other species. Humans are willing to sit quietly next to total strangers in a dark movie theater or in a crowded train. Other animals are mostly not capable of this sort of feat.
Weren't they the oens who posted to Slashdot? (Score:2)