Autopsy Of A Furby 78
Cooper Stevenson writes: "Ever wonder what makes a Furby tick? Well, neither have I but it made for an interesting read." Personally, I'd rather see someone disembowel Teddy Ruxpin, but this is a good start.
One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.
Re:WTF! (Score:1)
Just curious... (Score:3)
While I do find it annoying to see this story grace the page yet again, I'll live. I understand it's probably timothy's first viewing of it, and that's fine, but once the error has been pointed out...how's about retracting it?
It might help improve reader opinion to at least acknowlege a screw up, rather than ignore it.
(Was the article updated while writing this? Let's find out.
Chinese Clones! (Score:1)
When furbies first came late 1998, I told my two young daughters about it, and they wanted one. We could not get any of them locally first due to non-availability, then due to the exorbitant high price.
Then, two Made in China clones appeared in the market at one third the price. One called Furbish, and the other called Baby (or similar).
We bought one for the kids after months of waiting, and to my dismay, they only played for half an hour with it and that was it! They never touched it again! What a disappointment!
I think I will not do an autopsy, but will kill the darn thing for the frustrating experience!
Re:Moderating stories (Score:3)
It used to be that I could spend hours from my workday pouring over interesting news and participating in discussions. Now it's all Furby and Protest redundants. It's denegrated to the point where this is a check-in-once-in-a-while sorta site, just like everything else. I blame it on Columbine. It's like a TV sitcom. It's all well and good until they attempt that "very special" show about awareness for {drugs, teen drinking, cancer, homosexuality, three-toed sloths, etc}. The fame gets to ya and you start to think you're terribly insightful and can make a difference, or something.
Ultimately everyone "cares" (Score:1)
This is annoying, but more importantly for
It doesn't make any sense that
Slashdot desperately needs to switch from selectign stories manually themselves to having readers themselves moderate the "submission queue", which then simply becomes the days story list, with users as always being able to select their desired browing level. At "Score 5" you'd get the top 10 or so intersting and new stories, and at "Score 0" you'd get the whole submission queue of 3-400 stories.
If slashdot doesn't change soon, more and more people are going to end up leaving and instead rely on sites such as "The Register" that can be relied on to be among the first to carry technical breaking news.
Re:Yes, it's old (Score:1)
Just show us the rejects! (Score:1)
Well then, just take all the flame garbage and crap; throw it in a new tree of the main page called "Garbage that didn't make it". Now take everything else that didn't make it and put it in a new queue... That way we get to see all the groovy stuff that lost out to yet another post about a new alpha linux driver for furby surgery herf gun... and hey maybe we can even vote for articles in the queue and if they reach a certain positive point total they can be submitted to the main page from "Slashdote Losers(sic)" or something less appropriate.
---
Openstep/NeXTSTEP/Solaris/FreeBSD/Linux/ultrix/OS
Seeing the Queue is a Bad Thing (Score:3)
Say there are about 400 stories in the queue right now. If that queue were made public, you'd see it jump to about 900, I bet, if not more. And the headlines would probably mostly match a search on the words 'hot grits', 'oog', 'portman', 'penis', 'fuck', 'trolls on parade'
Maybe that could be addressed with another layer of moderation. But I think that kinda misses the point-- the owners of this site are the benevolent dictators and gatekeepers. Slashdot is, ultimately, theirs. If you disagree, visit SlashCode [slashcode.com].
Re:Yes, it's old (Score:1)
I've heard that Shakespeare stole, err... borrowed some of his material from others, so Chris Carter isn't doing anything unusual or unheard of by ripping off Shakespeare...
You philistine.
From Merriam-Websters Online Collegiate Dictionary [m-w.com]: one uninformed in a special area of knowledge.
Guilty as charged. I haven't read Shakespeare since high school over 20 years ago, and then it was under duress. He's just another DWM (dead white male) to me. Jeez, judging from the atrocious grammar/spelling of your average
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
Re:Moderating stories (Score:2)
The year's in the URL. Look up there, you'll see "sid=00/04/30".....
--
Re:Moderating stories (Score:1)
Re:Moderating stories (Score:1)
The other benifit of the site is that Rusty will delete the trolls, making things much easier to read. Its liabilities are that voting on the submissions are not good for news stories, it has a much smaller readership (1500 or so ids at last count), and Rusty is still fixing some of the old bugs. Anyway, swings and roundabouts, you don't like /., no one forces you to read it.
--
Re:Furby (Score:1)
Remember the rules dont't feed it after midnight and never allow it near water
Ever wondered how a Firby looks unaturally like a Gremlin...
Re:Yes, it's old (Score:1)
Yes, That's My Furby Site In Your Pants... (Score:1)
Yup, the FA was mentioned here back in '98. BTW, the Autopsy is not updated anymore because, well... Furbys are lame, and we just don't give a Pokemon's ass about 'em anymore. Plans to combine a Furby with one of those annoying singing plastic Xmas trees and call it "Douglas Furby" were abandoned sometime mid-99. Sigh. Like Wang Chung's popularity, "Party Of Five", and the Cuban Missile Crisis, "it was fun, folks, but it's over."
Re:IF I EVER... (Score:2)
- Stop praying for someone to save you, and save yourself.-
KMFDM
Re:WTF! (Score:1)
Re:Moderating stories (Score:3)
However, I think moderation depends on what Taco, Hemos, Nate and Potter plan on doing with slashdot. The only reason I wouldn't want moderation of stories would be because the founding purpose of
Then again, is it really that big of a deal. Do any of us feel really all that violated when we have to see a post on something that we have already seen in the past. My point: Who cares!
Re:WTF! (Score:1)
Re:Yes, it's old (Score:2)
That's old news too. South Park had an episode LAST YEAR that covered that topic...
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
Re:Moderating stories (Score:4)
The 400+ people with submissions in the queue that didn't see the light of day for that repost care.
--
Re:Moderating stories (Score:1)
Moderation isn't a solution to a problem, it's a replacing of a problem with another, uglier problem. And, since Rob/Hemos/Etc RUN the board, they have the power/right to decide how to run it. So, realize that, realize that they don't want story moderation, and quit whining about it over and over and over. Talk about repeatition.
--knick
Re:Desperate? (Score:1)
Re:Yes, it's old (Score:1)
So... (Score:1)
Slashdot, R.I.P. (Score:1)
Why on earth don't they add a new poster or two--someone who's been reading for a while and knows what's been posted already? Any one of the people complaining that this is an old story, for example. This is just ridiculous.
--
Re:Repeat -MODERATORS on CRACK AGAIN - was #2 post (Score:1)
This shows how moderators should not read everything from highlest to lowest, since all that does is provide positive feedback for those submissions that have already been bumped up.
currently moderating without my head up my ass
(I think)
Re:Murderers! (Score:1)
Re:Moderating stories (Score:1)
Re:Repeat (Score:1)
Wow, I miss my dog. Thanks for the chuckle.
--
A host is a host from coast to coast...
Repeat (Score:2)
Yes, I am easily amused.
--
Re:WTF! (Score:3)
Third time? (Score:4)
http://slashdot.org/articles/99 /01/03/1950227.shtml [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/articles/98 /12/11/2338244.shtml [slashdot.org]
furbies and college (Score:3)
Yes, it's old (Score:1)
Re:WTF! (Score:1)
Re:WTF! (Score:4)
http://slashdot.org/articles/98
even better... (Score:2)
Perhaps offtopic, but.... (Score:4)
Consider this like the Sunday edition of the New York Times. Sure, there are some interesting stories in the back pages of the travel section, but should that be a "headline" story?
Besides... this is only a natural evolution of the posting moderation. That and the main editors (Rob & Co.) could still have "unlimited" story moderation points to pretty much put things where they want them anyway. It would allow the readers to put a little bit into how they feel about a story as well.
Anyways.... this story is truly stale news. The page info from the server says:
Last Modified: Sunday, August 01, 1999 06:33:45 PM Local time
Or even note that cross reference pages even have a link to
Re:Repeat (Score:1)
Marshmallow Bunny Survival Tests (Score:2)
heh heh.
Maybe it's old news, but it reminds me of the Marshmallow Bunny Survival Tests. (Not exactly new either, but they might be new to someone.)
See:
Re:Perhaps offtopic, but.... (Score:1)
The other way round is far more likely to happen. Remember its got a lucky dolllar in its name. M$
Farhat.
I thought this said "Autopsy Fury" (Score:2)
It's way too late and I'm not reading right.
It isn't just that the story was repeated. (Score:1)
There are articles that I've submitted that are far more interesting than this. Like an interesting virus that uses your modem (if you have one) to dial '911.' It's true! Yet this story was repeated for the third time.
Do any of the individuals that 'accept' stories for Slashdot talk amongst themselves? Or is the Web simply running out of interesting things for Geeks, so we run across them again and again?
I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'
Death by Autopsy (Score:1)
It was a mercy murder [Audence]
[Rocky Horror Picture show]
"I knew a guy who really loved his work..
he did autopsys...
He found a hobo on a bench and did an autopsy to discover why he did...
He was honnest.. Death by autopsy"
[Author forgotten.. anyway I mangled it]
"He's dead jim"
"You grab his wallet I'll grab his phaser"
"Now give me the wallet"
-Old joke going around...
The punchline was my own but I did it like 15 years ago...
"We can rebuild him.. we can make him better stronger faster and less annoying...
we can make him the first 1 million doller Furbe"
Furby (Score:1)
Re:Moderating stories (Score:1)
Farther down, I'd rather read about first-posting Natalie Portman's petrified grits than this crap. The furby thing has been posted before; twice! At least the trolls can think of new ways to combine the words "hot grits" "Natalie Portman" "First Post!" and "Naked and Petrified".
And... (Score:1)
Damn, don't ya have anything else to do? Are you a student? If so, finals are undoubtedly coming up...if not, how 'bout some laundry, some housecleaning, etc.? Put a little soap and water on those dirty dishes that are piling up since you're too busy hunting down redundant posts? How's the weather where you're living? Where I am, it's beautiful. I skipped out on church to sleep in (I'm bad) and since my home church has low numbers, they don't meet every Sunday, and I'm going to be a bad bad person and mow some grass since It's beautiful and sunshiny. Unlike some of my coding friends, I no longer pass for a vampire; I'm getting a bit brown. While that's not healthy, it *does* prove that I'm not sitting at the computer all day hunting down redundant Slashdot posts.
Truthfully, I went ahead and looked at the site again...it's funny as hell, funnier than that damn AfroSquad, almost as funny as watching Troops. "All suspects are guilty. Period. Otherwise, they wouldn't be suspects, would they?"
Re:Moderating stories (Score:1)
Even if it didn't if the story got moderated up that would mean people either
1. Didn't see it the first time (so redundancy is meaningless) or
2.Were interested enough in a story to want ot read more and post more about it. Not bad things in my opinion.
B) Put only INTERESTING stories up
Once again moderation could show what the majority community feels is interesting. True it may not help submissions but it may give the editors a feel for the current mood of their audience.
Just my $.02
-Marc
Flame all you want, I'll Post more.
Re:Hot Grits and the "Chosen" People (Score:1)
The bionic furby... oh wait... (Score:1)
We have the technology.
We have the capability to make the world's first Biological furby.
Furby #11252 will be that furby.
Better than it was before.
Better . . . cuddlier . . . and ten times more annoying!
(quickly brings pinky to side of mouth)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Murderers! (Score:1)
Probably the most prominent name on the Clinton Body Count list is that of White House Staffer Vince Foster, a confidante of President and Mrs. Clinton. Foster's name has been closely linked to the Whitewater scandal and Foster has been mentioned in the latest White House uproar over misuse of FBI files.
This has information about Bill Clinton's body count, I believe that he is the one actually responsible for this violent practice of killing innocent furbies. Bill is known for starting wars to protect his ass from being fired. I am sure that given enough time, instead of fighting defensless countries somewhere east, he would actually try to divert public's attention from his promiscuous life style to the robotic droids known as furbies. Imagine hearing newscast:
-The president of the USA has commanded his army to take on the furby factories.
-My dear fella Americans. Our country can not continue to sit and do nothing while millions of furbies are invading our home nation. For how long, I ask you, for how long will the attrocities continue? Furbies, (http://www.furby.com [furby.com]), these inhumane creatures, they are taking over our lives, they are everywhere. I can't sleep at night, and it is not just because Monica won't let me, it is because of public outcry. The public can not take this anymore. Furbies are disturbing our life style, they take us away from our families and the TV shows that we love. Average american spends more time with his/her Furby then listening to my speaches. I can not take this any more! A la guerre, comme a la guerre! Down with furbies!
This is old news (Score:1)
But can it run Linux? (Score:2)
Hey, even better... I could wire it to my house's electrical wiring, and run my whole house off the furby!
Re:WTF! (Score:1)
When playing the C64 version of Super Mario Bros (well, ok, Great Giana Sisters) hold down all 5 keys simultaneously to automatically warp to the next level with a hefty time bonus: M A N F R
:)
Bowie J. Poag
Murderers! (Score:3)
Furby! (Score:2)
Re:Now it's on (Score:1)
"I am Teddy Ruxpin. I have come for your SOUL!"
Re:furbies and college (Score:3)
Moderating stories (Score:2)
This story would be moderated "Redundant" until it fell down somewhere between "Natalie Portman Pours Hot Grits Down Pants" and "Naked and Petrified First Posts".
--
Hack Furby a good site, too (Score:4)
http://www.homestead.com/hackfurby/
This place is pretty cool, too. They are trying to document the IR protocol. It has software to control the furby with a computer.
Re:Furby! (Score:1)
Do you see massive storage devices on them? Processors strong enough to handle speach processing, let alone figure out context for it? I think not.
Furbys come knowing a SET number of words, and over time and after playing with them for more time, they "learn" new words be simply loading that word into thier vocaburlary.
Don't underestimate how utterly stupid computers are.
Old stories... (Score:1)
Nothing to see here, guys, just keep on trolling...
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [ncsu.edu].
Re:Moderating stories (Score:2)
Story-by-story moderation is the way forward: it shouldn't necessarily knock stuff off the front page, but be there in the background to let the editors know when they've posted something truly lame.
What is news? (Score:1)
My point is that for something to be news, it should be something which is current that most people don't know about. Older web sites would be OK if they've been sitting pretty idle for the most part (and few links to them), but such a site should be an exception.
furbies aren't as bad as j/k (Score:1)
Fellow geeks: listen to your boiling blood and follow your heart. Make illegal copies of Katz's book and post them on the internet, everywhere. After all, we own part of what is contained in that book.
Jon Katz, I damn you. If you ever find yourself down on your luck, don't expect to receive pity from us again. You used this community to rebuild your pathetic career, and look what you give us in return.
You soaked up the blood of those bullet riddled corpses with the pages of that book. You stole the cries of all maligned geeks in this world. You'll make your quick buck, and you'll think you're content, but I promise you that those unresting spirits will haunt you for the rest of your days.
Jon Katz, raper and pillager of the very souls he claims to defend.
You are a monster.
"The Birth of Furby" lecture is on MURL. (Score:1)
Re:furbies and college (Score:1)
Re:Moderating stories (Score:2)
Furby death (Score:1)
See, if I were designing the Furby, I would put in an easter egg which, when the Furby were cut open or otherwise mutilated, would cause the Furby to let out blood-curdling screams of pain!
Just thinking about some kid accidentally maiming his Furby and being terribly traumatized as a result just makes me chuckle.
Very Redundant (Score:1)
Oldie but goodie.. (Score:1)
I seem to remember reading in Keyboard or Electronic Musician waaay back in the 80's about two guys that sampled the control track from a Teddy Ruxpin doll, figured out what signals moved his body parts, and completely reprogrammed him into something called "Bob From Hell".
Can't find any info online about it though :-(
Re:Ultimately everyone "cares" (Score:1)
Furby Stories (Score:1)
I must have spent hours figuring out how to an autopsy,it was eithert that or work on some NT servers
The up-side is: ever since then I have been using the threat of an autopsy to discourage those people around me from purchasing one of the annoying balls of fur. So far the threats still work.
P.S. Anyone else notice that an unwillingness to fix NT computers directly causes net surfing?
P.S.S. Most of the NT servers are gone now, thanks for caring.
Devil Ducky
RedHat & M$? (Score:1)
Begin Venting...
1. Why would anyone want the Microsoft OS buisness? The code is bloated, excessively buggy, copyrighted out the *$$, the product has bad press, and it's losing it's following (finally).
2. Nothing could hurt the crusade (Jihad?) of open source more than Windows being owned by one of our own.
3. $10M would be much better spent on getting GNOME 1.2 finished, or pushing for a stable release of the GIMP this century, or even to buy me a keyboard where the spacebar works on the first try.
4. Why am I numbering these?
Venting Complete... [OK]
Devil Ducky
Re:Murderers! (Score:1)
Re:WTF! (Score:2)
The icon for the followup quickies also wasn't finished in time.