
The Mini-Quickies That Fell To Earth 114
johnathan spectre wrote in to tell us about these really cool plasma shoelaces. plasticPaddy wrote in to tell us about SkyBird, a nifty remote-control ornithopter. Fire up the flux capacitor, because feebeling wrote in about this WWW guide, circa 1993. seizer told us about some crazy guy TCP/IP tunneling through E-mail: now that's dedication. Speaking of crazy people, Green Monkey scared me with his submission, a Web site devoted to Pokémon butts. From the self-referential bucket, the Webby Awards have nominated Slashdot in the 'Community' and 'Print and Zines' categories. Go Vote and we get some trophy or something. _damnit_ wrote in with a nice little piece on the Ides of March. In case you're in the greater Boston area, Rob 'CmdrTaco' Malda will be speaking at the Geek Pride Festival at the end of the month.
Wow! (Score:1)
Dan
Geek Pride (Score:1)
Congradulations (Score:3)
(Especially with all the
-- Moondog
Tux's Ass? (Score:2)
electric laces (Score:1)
Plasma Laces (Score:1)
The question that plagues us all (Score:1)
Chris Hagar
Email Tunnel (Score:3)
That TCP/IP over email tunnel sounds quite like the problems space stations and probes have.Often it will take many hours to get a reply back if the probe is far away. NASA has spent lots of research money trying to figure out ways to get past this by allowing the probes to do their work automatically. But supporting something like TCP/IP will always be impossible, TCP connections have problems on *any* high latency connection, even a high-speed satelite connection. To combat this both sides use large send and receive buffers to keep bandwidth up, that's what the Allow Large Windows Linux kernel option is for.
shoelaces? (Score:1)
The Good Reverend
Memories... (Score:1)
Geek Pride? (Score:3)
pokemon butts?! (Score:1)
From dancing hampsters (though they are rather cute) to pokemon butts to virtual hugs, anything that can be about anything has somehow found its way onto the net.
The sad part is that someone actually thought it was interesting enough to put the time into writing the page!
Re:The question that plagues us all (Score:2)
Actually Nintendo created the games in question that he derived the page from. So technically from the beginning Nintendo has been warping our children's minds with those evil Pokemon characters (I think they developed this out of an idea from a gay Jamacian porn movie).
Glowing wire: AMAZING! (Score:4)
The stuff is amazing, a company in Israel has the patent on the stuff otherwise I imagine it would be everywhere. Anything you can do with neon you can do with this stuff (although it doesn't last forever) I think that Macintosh should start putting it in their I-Macs. I could see it used in phones, glove compartments, monkeys, everywhere!
If you really want to see this stuff in action go to burning man [burningman.com] this summer! People go crazy with it. woo hoo!
-WG
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:2)
to get past this by allowing the probes to do their work automatically. But supporting something like TCP/IP will always be impossible, TCP connections have problems on *any* high latency connection, even a high-speed satelite
connection. To combat this both sides use large send and receive buffers to keep bandwidth up, that's what the Allow Large Windows Linux kernel option is for.
Perhaps a windows client? This would be a nice little tool where things like content filtering in Schools and libraries is often the norm.
How popular is the web? (Score:1)
Today there are at least 100 hypertext Web servers in use throughout the world.
nice :)
TCP/IP over E-mail? pah! (Score:3)
Yes folks, you heard it right. Pictures broadcast over the airwaves, recaptured, changed to ASCII, subtitles added and broadcast over a telnet connection from linux box.... telnetevision will take the world by storm!
And all so that people needn't leave the public clusters to see the latest edition of Futurama...
What other wonders does the future have in store? Who knows, but with telnetevision, who will care? Not I!
--
Re:TCP/IP over E-mail? pah! (Score:2)
Yes folks, you heard it right. Pictures broadcast over the airwaves, recaptured, changed to ASCII, subtitles added and broadcast over a telnet connection from linux box.... telnetevision will take the world by storm!
And all so that people needn't leave the public clusters to see the latest edition of Futurama...
What other wonders does the future have in store? Who knows, but with telnetevision, who will care? Not I!
This is not a bad thing nor is it something that is especially evil or backward. Usually in restrictive environments the brute and unsophisticated methods are very often times the ones that are necessary.
Actually this is possible. All you have to have is large ammounts of disk space or a really fast computer. Essentially you can have a connection to a machine with a tv tuner card. Then have an application like bttv or some other linux app do screen shots of each frame of the thing in question. Then convert the files to pnm (portable anymap) and then convert the resulting files to ascii with aview. Then you could theoretically take the output and cat all the files together or have a cat filename.001 filename.002 and so on with a clear call after each frame.
Bamo instant television over telnet. This medium would work best over delayed broadcast type medium. To get good output you would have to use a small font on the terminal. I use gnome-terminal at a value of Clean Medium at 6 pt to view ascii art creations and it works great.
Webby Nomination (Score:2)
On the Community nomination
ICQ has a better community type presence (IMO), but how many ICQ users are going to know about the Webby awards? I think
I can see it now... (Score:2)
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:2)
Make Seven
Re:I can see it now... (Score:2)
barely playable.
Clear back in the 1890's chess by mail was a reality. What would be interesting would be to have say an interavtive game with extremely good graphics to be done via say e-mail. You have a machine that sends the data over e-mail and your client parses it. Turn based games work on this principle already.
About the tunneling TCP/IP over email... (Score:2)
I have a couple of doubts on the subject, though. TCP/IP is inherently a low-latency protocol... (by low-latency, I mean less than 5 minutes). In the case of email, were looking at, potentially, latencies of up to 15 min or more. How would the TCP/IP client or server application handle those? You would have to manually readjust the timeouts in the software before trying out this stuff. I see it as very interesting, though.
I was also thinking... this way of tunneling depends entirely on the mail servers... which sometimes, in some businesses at least, are very, VERY overloaded... adding more to the latency... in contrast, a tunneling solution would almost certainly have a server dedicated to it... making it much faster... oh well, just thinking on the subject.
from the WWW guide one... (Score:1)
Nobody even imagined back in the day that we could have sounds, videos, and animations on the page itself. But now we do, and what do we do with it?
Hampsterdance, [hampsterdance.com], that's what.
Make Seven
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:1)
pgp?
Re:shoelaces? (Score:2)
random tip: altoids crushed in coke or pepsi... mmmm.
Plasma network cables (Score:1)
1993 Guide to the Internet (Score:3)
"Today there are at least 100 hypertext Web servers in use throughout the world."
Wow. I feel old. I have no doubt that within a decade, it will be hard to even remember what life was like before the ubiquitous "http://...". It will be like trying to imagine life without telephones. Sure, people will read about it, but they won't really "get" it. Even if they grew up "pre-web".
Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:1)
Re:Webby Nomination (Score:1)
All ICQ has to do is to put up a notice on their web page asking users to vote for ICQ, and if even 1% of their users vote, ICQ will win.
Email Tunnelling (Score:1)
Re:1993 Guide to the Internet (Score:1)
they won't really "get" it. Even if they grew up "pre-web".
I remember growing up without a television and also without a computer til I was in the 10th grade. Life was definately simpler. Although some of my fondest memories were of watching cartoons on my little black and white television at 6am.
I think that people can get it but just some of the more interesting apects will be hard to convey.
Pokemon (Score:1)
What's slower than tunneling IP over mail? (Score:5)
"Patent Considerations: There is ongoing litigation about which is the prior art: carrier or egg."
Not quite Tux... (Score:2)
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:3)
Actually there is work being done on the Interplanetary Network Protocol (IPN) at this time. There is an article on it here [spaceref.com] and here [spaceref.com] (and yes, we suggested this story to Rob and the boys and got turned down for some reason). Its quite a fascinating task to tackle.
Disclaimer: I work for spaceref.com just so you know...
Ornithopters (Score:1)
I think #4 is my ass... (Score:1)
Re:TCP/IP over E-mail? pah! (Score:1)
This stuff reminds me of SOAP or XML-RPC or whatever it's called. It would just seem easier to change the firewalls rather than try to run everything over HTTP and SMTP.
--
Use of the word "circa." (Score:1)
The page is clearly dated October 1993, so (in my quite humble opinion) since we have an exact year, it is not proper to use circa.
Am I wrong on this?
Stuff it! (Score:1)
Stuffstuffstuffstuffstuffstuff
-WG
Quote from the Plasma Laces site (Score:2)
Am I the only one wondering about the last sentence?
Bah! The internet is nothing! (Score:1)
Oh man, the internet does not change our lives very much at all! Compare the internet revolution to that of when the automobile was invented. The internet and computers are just small fries compared to what cars has done to world culture. Imagine what it would have been like to grow up "pre-car"
-WG
Quickies Reply (Score:3)
The Plasma shoelaces look really interesting. The thing that gets me, is the Website says they have a 13 hour battery life (and the blinking slows down drain...), but can you turn them OFF? And how hard can you tighten your laces before a rupture sprays plasma in your eye? Or, what if the dog gets ahold of your shoes, and thinks the blinking laces look tasty?
The SkyBird doesn't look that cool. It would be niftier if it was physiologically correct against a REAL bird, and flew like a real bird.
Reading the WebGuide was a trip back, but this section gave me pause:
How was the Web created?
The Web began in March 1989, when Tim Berners-Lee of CERN (a collective of European high-energy physics researchers) proposed the project to be used as a means of transporting research and ideas effectively throughout the organization. Effective communications was a goal of CERNs for many years, as its members were located in a number of countries.
1989? Jeez, Al Gore must have just been getting started. (The document has no mention of ARPANET that I could find whatsoever.)
Pokemon Butts: WHY GOD, WHY?!
CmdrTaco: That's GEEK pride. PLEASE make sure you show up at the correct festival. GEEK pride. GEEK.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Re:Congradulations (Score:2)
Well, /. will win the community award, easy.
(especially since that's the one all the hacking /.ers will stuff)
But even I plan on voting for Salon in the magazine category. Honestly, it's better than most print magazines. And frequently, Slashdot articles point to Salon features. So there you go
Re:Not quite Tux... (Score:1)
50 GB (Score:1)
I think that I probably downloaded that much stuff today on my own...
-----
Re:Quickies Reply (Score:1)
"The Web" != "The Internet"
This is for real (Score:3)
I'm a terrible programmer, but in half an hour of mucking about I came up with something interesting. There's some very crude screenshots here [man.ac.uk] and here [man.ac.uk]. I'm currently working on some working scaling code (to get the aspect ratio right), 'aliasing' (,,, ''' etc), and possibly some way for the program to do the grabbing itself. Image grabbing is currently done by Xawtv's streamer program.
Well, as I said, I'm very sorry about all this.
Re:The question that plagues us all (Score:1)
You'd pick Pokemon, wouldn't you?
I thought so.
128K? Luxury! (Score:2)
In Brazil we use IP over regular surface mail. Horrid ping times, usually several weeks. In fact I'm still waiting for the original 1993 web document to be loaded, and I started the connection in 1993!
Re:I can see it now... (Score:2)
RFC1149
RFC1149 [ietf.org]
Pretty funny! I seem to remember there was one of these for a coffee pot protocol... hmm...
Ongoing, Perpetual Geek Pride Festival (Score:2)
We call it "silicon Valley".
WWW Guide? (Score:1)
Dammit, I mean DOESN'T (NT) (Score:1)
Routing through e-mail (Score:2)
Ah, those were the days...
Re:Speaking of Pokemon and butts... (Score:1)
Plasma Shoelaces (Score:1)
Re:1993 Guide to the Internet - how little change (Score:2)
Let us not be too proud of our progress, however. Read the document, and think how LITTLE has changed in six years. There is more of everything, but that page looks as modern as any other. Note the discussion of neat MOSAIC features such as MPEG and streaming QuickTime video ...
We have been standing still by comparison with the period from 1989 to 1993 (Gopher, HyperG, the web, etc.) Consider all the stillborn and unborn: RDF, VRML, VR conferencing, true hypertext, NNTP/HTML collaboration frameworks, Xanadu, alternative navigation frameworks (RDF, Apple's Project X). CSS-2 is barely implemented anywhere, and even CSS-1 is not implemented. Client-side Java has struggled.
Those were the days of the giants, and now we are still digesting those changes -- and fighting endless patent battles.
Ahh, when I was a younger man ... now those were exciting days. Let me tell you .... :-)
john
Email networking.. that's nothing! (Score:2)
Oh man... (Score:1)
I still remember the day I upgraded from Mosaic to Netscape, of course, little did I know how related they were, but it was so cool, finally being able to download multiple images as well as the text at the same time. No more downloading the HTML, then downloading the background (which of course, was a MUST for webpages back then), then downloading every image. Netscape could handle more than once at a time.
I really wish I could go back in time for an Internet not polluted with noise, just lousy background images...
Any other
_____________________
step one: place
TCP/IP by air... (Score:3)
Anyhow, if you don't mind coming up with your own protocol, and high lag is a way of life (like a Mars-Earth IP link), just transmit everything redundantly over a UDP like protocol with extra redundancy! Then keep everything on file for retransmission if packets still get lost.
Re:the Ides of March (no, not the music group) (Score:1)
Watch out for the e-mail tunneling site (Score:1)
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4886]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2165, 80
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4886]: Returned: 2165 , 80 : NO-USER
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4888]: Connection from gore.nocrew.org
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4888]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2166, 80
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4888]: Returned: 2166 , 80 : NO-USER
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4889]: Connection from gore.nocrew.org
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4889]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2167, 80
Mar 15 22:49:34 DarkStar identd[4889]: Returned: 2167 , 80 : NO-USER
Mar 15 22:49:35 DarkStar identd[4890]: Connection from gore.nocrew.org
Mar 15 22:49:35 DarkStar identd[4890]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2168, 80
Mar 15 22:49:35 DarkStar identd[4890]: Returned: 2168 , 80 : NO-USER
Mar 15 22:49:54 DarkStar identd[4891]: Connection from gore.nocrew.org
Mar 15 22:49:54 DarkStar identd[4891]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2169, 80
Mar 15 22:49:54 DarkStar identd[4891]: Returned: 2169 , 80 : NO-USER
Mar 15 22:49:55 DarkStar identd[4892]: Connection from gore.nocrew.org
Mar 15 22:49:55 DarkStar identd[4892]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2170, 80
Mar 15 22:49:55 DarkStar identd[4892]: Returned: 2170 , 80 : NO-USER
Mar 15 22:49:58 DarkStar identd[4893]: Connection from gore.nocrew.org
Mar 15 22:49:58 DarkStar identd[4893]: from: 192.137.161.201 ( gore.nocrew.org ) for: 2171, 80
Mar 15 22:49:58 DarkStar identd[4893]: Returned: 2171 , 80 : NO-USER
Re:TCP/IP by air... (Score:1)
Re:TCP/IP by air... (Score:1)
A protocol with lots of redundant redundancy to reduce the effect of errors, but without ACK/NAK and therefore without the hassle with windowing that high latency brings.
I think NASA has already come up with space-borne versions of the major TCP/IP protocols to solve this problem, but I forget the link. There was a /. story about it once. Here it is: Interplanetary Internet protocol in devel. [slashdot.org]
Re:This is for real (Score:1)
Synergy (Score:1)
Lets do the basic addition:
Pokemon Porn
+Battery Powered Birdies
+Plasma laces(You make that sound more whacky)
+Glowing Electric Wire
=The makings of a cartoon butt-bomb ?
In case you are not laughing, my condolences on the death of everyone you held dear.
What do you mean ? Of course it's funny.
OK, I'm done abusing your bandwith for now.
Re:The question that plagues us all (Score:1)
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:1)
Re:This is for real (Score:1)
I swear that second [man.ac.uk] one looks like Peter Davidson... scary stuff.
--
Re:Synergy (Score:1)
Hrm. Perhaps you were thinking of:
Pokemon Butts
+ Battery-Powered Birdies
+ Plasma Laces
+ Glowing Electric Wire
+ TCIP/IP Tunneling Over Mail
=A Hyper-Lightspeed Antenna [slashdot.org]!
The Pokemon Butts react with the Battery-Powered Birdies to generate the opposing planes of force, while the Plasma Laces and the Glowing Electric Wire provide the parallel heat sources and the "input" and "output" "ports".
TCP/IP Tunneling over Mail is the obvious protocol to use for communication: with negative latency, no less!
Re:Congradulations (Score:1)
Later...
Palm(c) Pr0n (Score:1)
Palm(c) Pron [ebay.com]
Excerpt:
A typical Palm Vx user review...
O Palm Vx, how do I love thee? Let me count the ways. You are super slim and very light indeed. A PDA is only as useful as it is portable, and you are the most portable of them all. You are a beautiful metallic color, and you get nice and chilly when I set you down. When I take you out, people look at you with envy because you are so sexy. You have a rechargeable lithium-ion battery, which I like better than the AA batteries your predecessors (and your successor, the Palm VII) require. I like this because I like always having a fully charged battery, instead of having to replace batteries periodically. Some people don't like this because they don't like carrying around your cradle or your travel recharger when they travel, but I don't mind. Unlike your dull sibling the Palm V, you have 8 MB of main memory, four times as much. You are much smarter and can remember much more stuff. You come with AvantGo, which is nice for reading stuff fro! ! m the Web when I'm not at my machine. Whenever I HotSync you, you download some of my favorite Web pages, and I can read them later, like during a boring meeting. But Palm Vx, you are not perfect. I will now list some of your flaws, so you will not get a big head on me.
You are practically naked. The little leather cover that comes with you is little more than something to protect your screen from getting scratched. What's more, it presses one of your buttons when it is held closed, and this can mess up alarms that go off while the cover is on in this way (though there is a HackMaster hack, PalmVHack, that works around this). I'm working on getting a new case for you right now.
Re:Synergy (Score:1)
This is one neato reply, you shoulda gotten a 5 ! And I oughta get banned.
Re:Palm(c) Pr0n (Score:1)
You should have gotten Score 0: Flamebait.
you are so sexy No offense but that guy who wants to fuck misty suddenly seems a lot more normal.
I love computers too (though I prefer my two-processor home-made beowulf-supercomputer to any PDA) but sheez man, there is a very thick line between geek and gross, and your on the wrong side.
Re:I can see where this is going... (Score:2)
TCP/IP over floppy disks! (Score:1)
Re:This is for real (Score:2)
Alternatively, when you've missed an episode of South Park, maybe you could view later it in glorious textorama on Deja.
Keep up the good work.
Regards, Ralph.
Plasma Shoelaces/Electroluminescent Fibers (Score:1)
If you want the tech specs, go to: www.livewireent.com [livewireent.com]. They also sell the fiber but it costs more unless you want bulk. ($1.42/ft but only on full 820ft rolls)
It seems to have the best efficiency running at 80v, 450mw/meter, @2000hz refresh. The effective life of the material is about 800-1000hrs which puts it at 50% output. It can run out to twice that, but the output becomes negligible. It has a maximum "safe" bending radius of about 5 iameters. It can be bent more but you've got a chance of realigning the EL material. It is also moisture sensitive but most of the manufacturered stuff is environmentally sealed (water resistant with shrink-tubing but not necessarily waterproof) You can cut it yourself and just solder the end connections together and put a heat-shrink end on it.
You can also get sheets of this stuff from other vendors. If you're interested I can email you the links I've got.
Whoa! (Score:1)
Being able to make a rfc for that is insane enough but what would be geniusly insane would be to implement it.
Of course the Open BSD version would use pigeons with DNA-based steganography [slashdot.org] and cryptography (to be invented). It would also be engineered with materials that make it almost undestructible.
The Linux version would be sold by three hundreds different birds factories and would have most of the features of the other versions in option. It would also run on Pigeons, Eagles, canaris and even on pterodactyles for those of us that didn't upgrade our hardware.
The FreeBSD version would have a faster IP stack implemented in the pigeons, making them fly at supersonic speed.
The windows version would be with different colored feathers that look beautoiful but would literally crash without visible reason from the casual user POV.
The old Mac version would let you enter your packets only in one way and retrieve them only in one way, which is very simple but gets in your way when you are used to use a Unix pigeon.
The new Mac OS X version looks even better, can work on very long distances without problem but has got some useability issues such as when you overload the interface with too muck packets.
What's new on the WWW? (Score:1)
Speaking of 1993, that's when NCSA started publishing What's new for this little package they had called Mosaic.
Here's the first issue. [uiuc.edu]
I was rather surprised to find that a lot of the links I tried still work. I guess that being "first to market" causes some staying power.
Re:Gay pride? (Score:1)
Nah, thats first sunday in june and much, Much cooler. :)
Though maybe I can get a pride for pride attendance deal going with my NICOE this year.
-Kahuna Burger
a bit more info (Score:1)
Wanna make your own? Cool Neon [coolneon.com] has pre-made kits as well as parts for those so inclined. There's a couple other sites i've found, but the bookmarks are at home, and I'm at work
Re:Email Tunnel (Score:1)
Disclaimer: I work for spaceref.com just so you know...
they already posted the story [slashdot.org] on that last august...
Bandwidth? (Score:1)
For a standard TV broadcast at 30fps, what's the cps? Any compression being done on the fly?
Har
--
looking forward to the eye problems this will cause
Re:Bah! The internet is nothing! (Score:1)
Crazytalk (Score:1)
Chris Hagar
Re:This is for real (Score:1)
######
#####
####
###
##
#
make it look like this:
------/
#####/
####/
###/
##/
#/
.
or something like that?
Or something like
Nope... :) (Score:1)
I've been experimenting with very basic colour support, using a kind of look-up table. The program has a list of ANSI foreground and background colours, along with various characters to print, and roughly what RGB values they correspond to. It's very messy, and doesn't work too well, but the colour is vaguely acceptable...
You can see some really bad screenshots here [man.ac.uk], here [man.ac.uk], here [man.ac.uk], and here [man.ac.uk] - the first two were of the initial, really bad colour support, being developed over telnet, naturally... The third is the new colour support with a very small lookup table, and the third is with a slightly larger lookup table (still very small though).
I considered 'detail' support, but I'm a terrible programmer and it probably wouldn't be worth the effort.
I've also got the program to display frames in sequence - it's almost semi-watchable...
Ford Prefect
Re:Nope... :) (Score:1)
Anyways, if you look closely at those photo collages that were so hip a couple of years ago, it almost does appear that they choose pictures based on sub-picture resolution colors... I'll explain:
Say the pixel you're doing contains the edge between a dark and a light area (someone's chin typically). If you look closely at those montages, it seems like the program has chosen mostly pictures that have the bottom half darker than the top half -- in effect getting sub-pixel (in this context, a pixel is one of the small pictures) resolution. You might be able to steal some code from there.
The ascii character set offers very few characters like that, but it'd be easy enough to do some downsampling of the pixel and then edge enhancement. If that matches one of a small set of cases (/\-_|+@VA>) reasonably well, use that, else use your grey-level lookup table.
D'ya got any movies to watch yet?