Just redo your constitutional setup.
"Just"
It's super hard to redo our constitution. There's only two ways, one is with fire and the other requires consensus.
It's not that the vast majority of people in the US ain't noticing that fundamentals of the US system have to change.
The vast majority of people in the US don't know shit.
Why are US lawmakers so bad at their jobs that these kinds of work-arounds are a thing? Don't they get experts to write the laws, and then fire them if they screw up this badly?
I've noticed that a lot of US tech companies don't understand how this isn't normal, and when they discover that the same work-arounds don't work in Europe, they get very upset.
Let's not forget how many nuns were/presumably still are
A) lesbians kicked out of society
B) young women with no prospects who found themselves working in a Vatican-owned brothel euphemistically called a convent
C) both of the above
This is of course nonsense.
You will never be free from oversight so long as you are using money. Nor should you be.
You seem to be illiterate.
Or just head over to The Pirate Bay and grab everything in a DRM-free format to enjoy.
To be fair, they don't. They want to slightly reduce the sun's output, so that it offsets the greenhouse effect we have caused. So no famine, just less catastrophic climate change (which causes famine) than we would otherwise experience.
The two biggest dangers are that we screw it up and dim too much, with no way to undo it, and that we use it as an excuse to keep polluting.
The UK just agreed a "deal" with the US where the cost of medication will rise by at least 25%. The cost of living crisis is not going away, it's getting worse.
Their model seems to be people who don't use a car enough to warrant owning one, but want the convenience of having access to one and are willing to pay a premium for it.
I'm not understanding how you could 'focus' an aerosol
I'm not understanding why you thought that was a reasonable reply to my comment.
Should this requirement apply to autonomous vehicles equipped with sensors that would prevent it from hitting a pedestrian when reversing?
Until they are infallible, yes.
the city should have banned charging stations in these locations via zoning before one was built there
Life is chock-full of "should haves", alas. Instead of each new project being better than the ones before, many people and organizations seem to think they know everything when they should have learned from others. I'm quite sure someone else had figured this out already.
If they have access to social media they might find out that the Pope protected a sex pest before he even became pope. I believe that's actually a requirement, though...
I'm not reading the code rn but I would assume the volume is mandated. It's got to be over a certain level to be considered audible to people with hearing disabilities. We had one on our RV as it used to be a bus, I disabled it. I will probably put it on a switch at some point though
On one hand you're right, on the other hand, unmet need is unsustainable
No, what's fucking stupid is that Microsoft clearly has no meaningful automated testing for these patches before they send them to "Insiders".
What's almost as stupid is defending their incompetence for free.
Vitamin C deficiency is apauling.
