Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:Biased summary (Score 1) 273 273

Yes, Reagan was a liberal. Did you notice, in your detailed dissection of the poll questions, that they were about science... not fucking idiocy like astrology? If there was a pool like this done on the idiotic fringe of "belief" systems, i'm would imagine that conservatives would score as having much higher numbers believing in the fringe areas, as conservatives tend to be much more prone to "believe" something than live in reality.

Comment: Re:Drone It (Score 1) 819 819

Oh not to worry... yet another test pilot saying the plane is a piece of shit hasn't changed my mind that it's a piece of shit... an expensive, useless, piece of shit, that can't fight, can't run, can't do what it was supposedly designed for... especially if it's raining.... that's bleeding taxpayer money because coward warmongers and neo-cons are scared of everyone, everything, and their shadow.

Anyone who complains about government spending, and doesn't start with this piece of shit, is nothing more than a fucking hypocrite.

Past due and massively inflated costs are the course for private companies stealing taxpayer money with impunity because of elected cowards.

Comment: Re:Drone It (Score 1) 819 819

If it works

...and there;'s absolutely no sign that it will. It's past due years, massively inflated costs, and THE PILOT says the thing is a piece of shit. I'll take his opinion over your hope and prayer that it may someday, in some mythical time of unicorns and fairies, that it actually works. Until then, all it is is a fucking waste of money by fucking cowards.

Comment: Re:Drone It (Score 1) 819 819

Yeh, that's bullshit. What accrues are projects like this that are nothing more than tax payer money giveaways to weapons makers, massive national debt, and the broken bodies of veterans who fight in those little wars along the way. What we need to do is have a forced draft of neo-cons and when they want a war, we send them in as battalions of grunts on the first day as cannon fodder. That's the only way these sick fucking twisted warmongers will ever get an idea of what war actually is.

Comment: Re:Time for incest NOW!! (Score 1) 1082 1082

I didn't realize you wanted to fuck your sister so much. You could have been doing this years ago if you live in some of the southern states... after all, their definition of a virgin is a girl who can run faster than her brothers. You go ahead and start working on getting that done, and maybe Rick Santorum can work on getting recognition for him marrying his dog.

Comment: Re:The Majority Still Has Follow the Constitution (Score 1) 1082 1082

It was about religious bigots trying to use tyranny of the majority to refuse rights to a minority. Marriage, even defined in the bible, is not just one man/one woman... so you're suggestion that it's some sacrosanct number is bullshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

What you want to do is define marriage in such a way as to use tyranny of the majority to disenfranchise a group of citizens. There are few things more opposed to the basic foundations of this country than that.

Comment: Re:Another great Scalia line (Score 1) 1082 1082

And this is why people think you're an idiot.

Our founding fathers were largely deists. Anyone who can actually read should already know that. While their values as deists isn't in question, their desires for this countries form of government in regards to religion, specifically Christianity, can be seen in the Treaty of Tripol1, article 11.. which was signed by some of the same members that signed the Constitution:

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

The 14th amendment is a great vehicle for actually making sure that people don't have their civil rights stripped because of fucking bigots like you. The majority does not get to use tyranny of the majority to strip peolpe of their rights... as much as you assholes want to try. It's unconstitutional, and that's what this court has said. I realize you never met a civic class you could actually pass, and your knowledge about the Constitution, the legal system, and civil rights is on par with what a rock knows about quantum physics, but when you say really stupid fucking partisan idiocy, like you have, you just look really fucking stupid... even when compared to that rock.

Your idea of marriage is like, as i said before, BULLSHIT. There have been all types of marriage, co-habitations, relationships, whatever you want to call them, throughout history.... the only way you can get to "one man, one woman forever" is to be a complete fucking idiot. Marriage in the US gives specific legal rights to the married couple.... The 14th amendment requires that people be treated the same; that states cannot take away peoples rights capriciously... or through tyranny of the majority.

I am constantly amazed by those who scream about tyranny from Obama, when in fact they are the ones trying to use tyranny of the majority to strip peoples rights. What fucking hypocrites.

Comment: Re:Another great Scalia line (Score 1) 1082 1082

Because while you may believe you know more about religion than me, you clearly don't know jack shit about the foundation of this country being THE CONSTITUTION.. not YOUR religious preferences. The US is NOT a theocracy. The US was NOT founded on a religion. We have a Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. Our legal system, and laws, were not based on your idea of these 3 great religions. Your religion should never have a damn thing to do with our laws.

Comment: Re:Another great Scalia line (Score 1) 1082 1082

Are you fucking stupid, or are you just being a fucking troll?

This country was founded on the Constitution, not some fucked in the head religion of backwards thinking dipshits. Civil rights ARE NOT subject to vote, otherwise we would be justified in voting to have trolls like you to have no rights at all. If you do not understand the premise of unalienable rights, buy a fucking book and read about it. In addition, the US Constitution supersedes state constitutions; if a state enacts a law or amendment that goes against the US Constitution, then that law/amendment cannot be enforced.

As for your bullshit argument that your three religions have always defined marriage a certain way... well, again... BULLSHIT. That argument only works on fucking morons who don't know a thing about their own fucking religion. Here's a good primer for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Lastly, you might notice some hostility on my part to religion. If you do, look in the mirror and understand that YOU, and people like YOU, are the cause.

Comment: Re:A dark day (Score 2) 591 591

What's a dark day is when people are incapable of using their brains to see objectively reality. This one line that you have your panties in a knot about is 4 words out of tens of thousands, thousands of which explicitly reference these subsidies being available to everyone. Being a fucking idiot, and focusing on 4 words, when everywhere else those words are shown to have an incorrect LITERAL meaning (although a correct LEGAL meaning...as in "the state" meaning government), is asinine to the extreme, and a position that only fucking morons would take. I'm sorry you've bought into the teabagger hysteria of lies and deceit; please, grow a fucking brain and use it.

Comment: Re:TNSTAAFL (Score 3, Insightful) 272 272

However, it's still not net neutrality. ATT got busted for fraud basically. They were lying to their customers. Sprint, because of their actions here, are basically admitting that they too were committing fraud, but because ATT got busted and they don't want to, they're going to stop lying to customers; they just needed a scapegoat, which was an easy find because, once again, we have a certain population in this country who HATE the government no matter what.... Sprint simply knew it could jerk their chain and they'd rant, rave, and froth at the mouth voicing their hatred of the government.

Let me fix that for you: "Telecoms could only offer "unlimited" data because it was never truly unlimited, BUT THEY WOULD LIE ABOUT IT SAYING IT WAS."

After an instrument has been assembled, extra components will be found on the bench.

Working...