I don't deny GCC but I certainly want to see the data.
I suppose the big questions is: beings as you are here, writing about climate change, why the fuck haven't you ALREADY looked at the data as it's been available for a while now?
Anyone who complains about government spending, and doesn't start with this piece of shit, is nothing more than a fucking hypocrite.
Past due and massively inflated costs are the course for private companies stealing taxpayer money with impunity because of elected cowards.
If it works
What you want to do is define marriage in such a way as to use tyranny of the majority to disenfranchise a group of citizens. There are few things more opposed to the basic foundations of this country than that.
Our founding fathers were largely deists. Anyone who can actually read should already know that. While their values as deists isn't in question, their desires for this countries form of government in regards to religion, specifically Christianity, can be seen in the Treaty of Tripol1, article 11.. which was signed by some of the same members that signed the Constitution:
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
The 14th amendment is a great vehicle for actually making sure that people don't have their civil rights stripped because of fucking bigots like you. The majority does not get to use tyranny of the majority to strip peolpe of their rights... as much as you assholes want to try. It's unconstitutional, and that's what this court has said. I realize you never met a civic class you could actually pass, and your knowledge about the Constitution, the legal system, and civil rights is on par with what a rock knows about quantum physics, but when you say really stupid fucking partisan idiocy, like you have, you just look really fucking stupid... even when compared to that rock.
Your idea of marriage is like, as i said before, BULLSHIT. There have been all types of marriage, co-habitations, relationships, whatever you want to call them, throughout history.... the only way you can get to "one man, one woman forever" is to be a complete fucking idiot. Marriage in the US gives specific legal rights to the married couple.... The 14th amendment requires that people be treated the same; that states cannot take away peoples rights capriciously... or through tyranny of the majority.
I am constantly amazed by those who scream about tyranny from Obama, when in fact they are the ones trying to use tyranny of the majority to strip peoples rights. What fucking hypocrites.
This country was founded on the Constitution, not some fucked in the head religion of backwards thinking dipshits. Civil rights ARE NOT subject to vote, otherwise we would be justified in voting to have trolls like you to have no rights at all. If you do not understand the premise of unalienable rights, buy a fucking book and read about it. In addition, the US Constitution supersedes state constitutions; if a state enacts a law or amendment that goes against the US Constitution, then that law/amendment cannot be enforced.
As for your bullshit argument that your three religions have always defined marriage a certain way... well, again... BULLSHIT. That argument only works on fucking morons who don't know a thing about their own fucking religion. Here's a good primer for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Lastly, you might notice some hostility on my part to religion. If you do, look in the mirror and understand that YOU, and people like YOU, are the cause.
Let me fix that for you: "Telecoms could only offer "unlimited" data because it was never truly unlimited, BUT THEY WOULD LIE ABOUT IT SAYING IT WAS."