Seems you don't care about users either. There is nothing in your post that shows you even thought about them. You're not an engineer, you're just an asshole.

Engineers think about user requirements.

Wow, just take a statistics class. You are embarrassing yourself.

If done correctly, the inclusion of Rust wouldn't break anything. And yet here we are.

Clearly things are not being done correctly (ie, with established engineering practices). If he actually had an engineering license, it would be revoked because of decisions like this.

Breaking architecture to improve parsing security on files that are almost always received from a trusted source is really a horrible choice. It's saying, "Fuck you" to those users.

The engineering decision is made worse by the fact that making a fallback to support those platforms would be simple, and is already mostly implemented. It's a bad enough decision that I'd have to say the person who made it is not an engineer, he's just an asshole.

How do you know that the summary is accurate?

This should be emphasized. Douglas Crockford says, "breaking compatibility is an act of violence."

Boogie Woogie? AI can't beat this or this. Not yet.

IT can provide a tremendous amount of slop.

You were clearly replying to a troll. Proof, he/she said this:

There wasn't any time TV shows had heart, but definitely not in 2005.

The Bell Curve is filled with bad math.

OK, this is an interesting topic.

If money is just on the ground, or gold found in the earth, most of us would pick it up.

If you had $10k in your wallet, most of us would not take it from you, and especially wouldn't take it by physically harming you. A few people would.

An even smaller percentage of the population would actively kill you to take the $10k from you.

'Greed' isn't a problem if it doesn't cause harm. There is a small percentage of the population (griefers) who will happily enshittify things. Bankers only see things in terms of dollars, they don't consider the harm they cause (although they do usually try to follow the law).

Probably not majorly, their capitalization is too low.

Nah, I wasn't saying you were wrong, I was just making a joke.

Clearly your point was correct since it was named after Mr Dna and not Watson, Crick or Franklin.

Interesting. Is there a source for this? Do you know which ad it was?

How to say you know nothing about Silicon Valley without saying you know nothing about Silicon Valley.

A legitimate question. It's easy to snidely say, "Why, are you posting from a smartphone that was invented in Silicon Valley?" and that's a legitimate response, but let's look at the question more deeply:

Historically, people have specialized into blacksmith, shepherds, farmers, etc. By and large this is a good thing, because by dividing and conquering, we can accomplish more together. (Of course, there can be problems, but by and large it's a good thing). Silicon Valley engineers are by analogy one of these specializations.

One of these specializations was "leadership," convincing people to do coordinated action, like building the pyramids or canals or other things that wouldn't exist without a strong hand forcing people to work together. I say "leadership" but somehow historically, "leadership" always meant violence, and "working together" always meant theft or slavery. If there was a surplus of grain or gold or anything, the violent leaders would swoop in and take it.

In the modern era, bureaucrats have replaced these experts in violence. Trump is severely limited in what he can do compared to King George (and every modern country's leader is the same). However, the specialists in coercion are still there, and when there is wealth on the table, they will swoop in and take it. These coercion specialists are concentrated in the banking industry and the MBA specialization. If they see something nice, or something they can exploit, they will, and the result is we can't have nice things.

And that is where enshittification comes from.