Comment Well duh! (Score 1) 26
If AI has never eaten a grilled cheese sandwich, how would you expect it to know what a protein shake is?
If AI has never eaten a grilled cheese sandwich, how would you expect it to know what a protein shake is?
I have the issue where not every mouse click is recognized. On anything. Web page, form, MS Office software, third-party software, Windows itself, text field, you name it. I'll click somewhere, the mouse directly on what needs selected, and nothing happens. I have to click again to do what I want.
I first noticed it in W10 and it has continued to W11.
NT existed when IBM brought out at least two major versions of OS/2 without such features while NT had them, so... No.
Even if it is in the largest font size, is the average person even going to understand what the ramifications are?
No, but it would let people who care know, and it would let people who potentially care google and find out.
My question is, why only 10 hours a month!?!? I'm sure that's the only reason it's free, but that should also alleviate some of the bandwidth usage concerns.
I would tend to assume that if you pay you get more, so it's just a trial version, and this is just an indirect slashvertisement.
There really needs to be an international age verification working group that spends the next five years coming up with a system, then pressures everyone to implement it.
I don't think creating a centralized world ID database is going to be a win at this point.
OS/2 had no security features needed for multiuser support. It might as well have been classic MacOS. Citrix had a multiuser version of OS/2 with security tacked on, but it wasn't a realistic solution and was never popular. Building an OS without security was the moronic decision that killed it. Plus IBM never did anything meaningful to promote it so nobody cared. That it was used anywhere (especially in ATMs) was a horrible decision itself because of the lack of security features and has created untold woes. Maybe nobody ever got fired because they bought IBM, but they should have.
It is neither right or wrong
It's wrong. The processor has a feature. People will reasonably assume they can use that feature. Then they find out it's disabled.
assuming the features or lack thereof is declared upfront.
If that declaration is not in the largest font size used in the materials then it's hidden.
For the 1000th time, having a "reaction" listed on VAERS _does not_ mean the vaccine caused the reaction. That is not how it works nor what that site is intended for.
But keep spreading misinformation if it makes you feel better and so you can keep your anti-vax credentials.
While the U.S. government was shut down and citizens weren't receiving the services they paid for, Israel continued to receive $63 million every day.
When Grok was asked who were the worst purveyors of "misinformation" was on Twitter and came back with Musk, minutes later Musk said that would be taken care of. In fact, Musk had Grok blocked from reaching sites which were critical of Musk and his lies.
So there's the truth.
Yeah, that was a big goof, thanks for understanding.
Apple is capable of hiring talented people and creating a useful product. They just don't seem to be capable of being user-friendly in the ways that matter to me. TBH they were never great at it, and MUGs did the heavy lifting in the customer relations department for them for free. Anyway I'm totally capable of believing their performance claims, to a reasonable point, especially when the results aren't putting them first.
I wish they were friendlier, because their hardware is reasonably impressive. I'm also just not in their target demographic apparently because I'd rather have a slightly thicker device with better cooling and battery capacity.
We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge. -- John Naisbitt, Megatrends