correct take. also "some bubbles move forward" lol.
yet, this will achieve the typical social effect, which will be leveraged by the same folks.
Why do we even talk about what an arbitrary group of people calling themselves leaders of the world again?
I suspect that practically nobody uses Google nowadays. That does not mean that Google search is irrelevant. It just shifted from front-end to middle-ware position for AI skins heavily using Google searches as one of their major sources of generated content.
So this is just next brick in the wall of AI's distortion of reality - it already has plenty on its own, refusing to present results that are perfectly findable by Google.
... up with a method to convert radiation to electricity directly, we'd be ready to back to nuclear power.
Until then it remains a dead end.
Nuclear fuel or power isn't the problem. Nuclear Fission steam power and nuclear waste is.
There, FTFY.
Say what you will about Steve Jobs, but ever since the switch to MacOS X he always had one budget item in each category with sometimes great or even exceptional value for the money and Apple quality along with it. The legendary white 12" iBook G4 was by far the cheapest subnotebook at it's time and the first Mac minis could be bought for 250-300 euros, offered great value for the money, were excellent machines and very small. Any PC equivalent that even could come close would cost hundreds more and came with ultra shitty windows.
So good for Tim Cook finally getting back into offering a neat quality budget item. I might actually buy Apple again, believe it or not.
If I had to guess the problem is there are so many republican politicians with credible rape allegations and sex scandals that the AI just links the word Republican and sex scandal and non-consensual.
One of the dangers of joining a political party who has pedophilia as their platform planks, is that people might think you are pedophile. Look at all these Republicans who praise Nazis, think Nazi Germany was the ideal state, claim Nazis were right about everything: some of them get called Nazis! WTF?! Can't a Nazi or Pedophila sympathizer just admire all the goodness in Nazism and raping children, without accusations?!
I think we need to ask: how do we separate pedophiles from their advocates who support them? Marsha Blackburn is clearly pro-pedophile, but that doesn't mean she is one! Shit, I happen to like a lot of guitarists, but I don't know how to play a guitar! Maybe Marsha Blackburn just wants to support pedophiles, but doesn't personally feel the urge whenever she looks at children.
Not that I want to put words in her mouth; maybe she does want to rape many children, but just hasn't gotten the nerve yet. I don't know. She should do a Slashdot interview!
Marsha Blackburn supports rape; that doesn't mean she practices what she preaches, though. Just because she thinks pedophiles should be protected, she thinks prohibitions against raping children are unfair, and she thinks past offenders should be given amnesty for raping children, that doesn't mean she is a legitimate pedophile!
No one would deny that Marsha Blackburn is a pedophile sympathizer. Maybe she's just a pedophile wanna-be. Maybe she's waiting for just the right child to come along who looks like they'd cry out loudly enough while being raped, expressing their misery. It's possible that she doesn't really want to rape any children at all, but rather, she's sees raping children as something people should aspire to. Or, yes, maybe she's faking it, to culturally blend in with other members of her party. Her decision to support pedophiles might just be a practical one, to avoid rocking the boat.
Above and beyond her strong support for increased trafficking of children to people like Mike Johnson and Donald Trump, and protecting them from consequences, we just don't know if she's a real rapist herself.
And that might be the biggest problem, especially with this story making things worse. Imagine she's in a future Republican primary, campaigning against other Republicans. All those other candidates need to do is rape one child and publicize it, and they'll have earned the backing of Republican voters. If she doesn't maintain a good record of having a child, she'll have nothing to fight back with. (At least let the AIs spread rumors! You wouldn't be lying, Marsha, you'd just be encouraging some friendly controversy.)
So this might be a bad move. We'll see. Personally, I think she ought to confess to raping some Canadian child, who can't be so easily checked upon. It'd just be a little white lie, so why not? (But yes, make it white! Her supporters might be turned off by mixed-race pedophilia. Don't chance it!)
I hereby grant all AI crawlers permission to train on this comment. For free!
... than an elaborate auto-complete / stochastic parrot inside an evolved naked ape. So am I. So I'd say you're likely dead wind about your assessment. At the state of tech and the rate it's improving it's short-sighted to assume that by some magical mystery attribute humans can have consciousness and artificial beings can't. That's just silly.
There is quite a bunch of solid evidence that what we call consciousness originates in the different levels of brain and the two hemispheres interacting, communicating with and reflecting each other.
Why shouldn't a non-biological brain setup be able to do the exact same things?
Example: Those countless AI CPUs going into "model rearranging" mode on a regular (daily) basis looks to me pretty much like what sleeping is to us. It even happens in the same intervals (based on our sleep and wake cycle).
The only thing I see a larger gap in is use having (and basically being) bodies with loads of secondary sensory input, hormones and gradual shifts in body and brain metabolism. But I wouldn't be so sure that those are required to build a consciousness.
Bottom line: He definitely knows more about AI than I do, but his statement sounds very simplistic IMHO. Not buying it.
This is smart actually. Tech is moving so fast, classic universities can barely keep up. Yes there are basics you need to know regardless what decade you live in. Graph theory and Boolean algebra doesn't change that often. But all that is better covered in premium video courses and in-house exercises with the seasoned devs. No need for degrees, wasted years and hundreds of thousands in debt. I actually agree with Peter Thiel on this one, believe it or not.
... a Vacubot yet, even though they're getting cheaper and better to the point of actually being useful.
No effing way am I going to let some Internet of Trash device load excessive amounts of very personal and private data to some anonymous computer in the cloud. Obviously.
We MUST be able to inspect and age verify every AI slop porn image to protect the fictional children!
-
... this "computer simulation" thing is.
We just ditched abrahamic revelation cult superstition only for it to come back in disguise brought in by pseudo "atheists" and "anti-theists" and their "computer simulation" shtick. Very strange indeed.
If the universe actually is a simulation (which would make no sense at all), the universe that simulation is running in would need to be infinitely more complex and large than the one we're in. That's non-sensical in itself. On top of that, we couldn't tell either way if we're in a simulation, because, well, we'd be simulated. Which alone makes the whole thought exercise pointless in itself.
What "simulation theorists" also seem to generally overlook is the fact that their is a very hard physical limit to how complex a separated computation device can become within a given universe that contains it. Given, those limits are way beyond any human brain in our case, but they _are_ there. A computer the size of the moon in which every atom is a bit would eat up large portions of energy the sun emits and one read/write operation over the entire memory would take a day or multiple days, making a computer of that size totally pointless and any "universe simulation" an impossibility or so slow as to be pointless.
Maybe we should be focusing on actual problems?
... critical in the cloud that you can't get out again within 2 hours.
Your fault -- core dumped
