Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:BBC / other state broadcasters? (Score 1) 132 132

Yes and No.

Let's take a very successful British (BBC) or Danish TV show, they are sold abroad and this money helps finance the next production.
Making all public or licence funded productions available EU wide or even globally available will cause some damage.

Comment Silly but (Score 0) 471 471

At least partially silly but I do understand some of the banned items like baseball caps (or any other head wear like hoodies) as they are totally impolite to be worn indoors.
What I miss is a ban on dark glasses while speaking with someone.
Anyway, what I mention as unacceptable are US-only problems :)
Which brings up the next issue, dress style is depending on the culture you are living in and may vary greatly around the globe.

Comment But does it run Linux? (Score 1) 79 79

The question 'but does it rune Linux?' needs these days of UEFI be expanded with the question 'is it easy to install?'
My W520 is still working very well but has been around the world and shows some scars and I'm trying to decide on a replacement.

Maybe it is a sign of the times these questions weren't addressed in the original article...

Comment Re:British man arrested for sale of grapefruit kni (Score 1) 63 63

You are looking in the right direction, the UK is since many years enforcing a nanny state and the subject of flashing displays fits nicely.

Yes it is horrible if you are afflicted with this sensitivity but I am really wondering why it is ONLY on UK TV that you are warned about an upcoming item with 'flash photography'.
Is this sensitivity outside of the UK so rare as to not be a concern?

Or do the sufferers in other countries just turn away their eyes when they notice the offending picture?

Comment Re:I'm surprised (Score 4, Informative) 58 58

Uhh, Cameron himself said he wants to scrap the European Human Rights Act.
http://www.independent.co.uk/n...
This European Convention on Human Rights has nothing to do with the European Union and pre-dates it by decades. Its institutions and courts are completely separate.

The Act covers all the rights included in the European Convention.

These rights are: Right to life, right not to be tortured or subjected to inhumane treatment, right not to be held as a slave, right to liberty and security of the person, right to a fair trial, right not be retrospectively convicted for a crime, right to a private and family life, right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, right to freedom of expression, right to freedom of assembly and association, right to marriage, right to an effective remedy, right not to be discriminated against, the right to the peaceful enjoyment of one’s property, and the right to an education.

The European Convention on Human Rights was the brainchild of Conservative Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill.
Its chief author was the right-wing Scottish Conservative lawyer Sir David Maxwell Fyfe.
Churchill needs no further introduction. Maxwell Fyfe is otherwise known in history for his forensic cross-examination of Goering at the Nuremberg trials, and for declining to intervene (when Home Secretary) in the hanging of Derek Bentley in 1953.
It is surely one of the most bizarre turns in politics that it is right-wing Conservatives who now oppose a treaty which their direct political predecessors created. There is nothing left-wing, excessively liberal, wet (or whatever) about freedom from arbitrary arrest, freedom from government expropriation of private property, the right to due legal process and all the rest of the treaty.

Freedom from state oppression is not an exclusively, or primarily, left wing credo.

Doing away with this 'horrible' act will in my view fit nicely with the ideas Mrs. May is voicing in the name of the Cameron government.

Comment Damn! (Score 4, Interesting) 110 110

My stupid sister and an equally stupid cousin uploaded their address book to Farcebook.
Then I got threatening mail from said Facebook imploring me to join 'my friends' on their website, a cold day in hell indeed!
So now after a few idiots have tagged me on their stupid 'Social' pages I'll be recognisable for every privacy invading company in the world.

Al I can do is waiting for a EU court to cut this crap as the US side won't do anything for us 'The People'.

Comment Re:Censorship in the US (Score 2) 180 180

Exactly!
That's why I carefully selected my ISP and mail provider, I can choose to receive all mail, including what is spam for others.
Now the problem is that a very large part of the world's population has selected Google (gmail) for mail and Facebook and Twitter for their information, dumb, yes but that's the present situation. (for dumb people).
It's similar to watching Fox News and declaring you're watching the news.

Comment Nothing wrong with proprietry software (Score -1) 216 216

There's nothing wrong with proprietary software as long as it is declared a such and we understand free software is better.

Although I've been running Kubuntu for over 10 years now and Linux (RH) since the late nineties I've never had a reason to visit this Ubuntu store, Muon (acces to the repositories) has most I want.

Quote from TFA:

After clicking on "More info" for some of the ones I don't know, I see "License: Unknown" and "Updates: Unknown". Basically, I am given the option to install software for which I have no idea what the license is.

Now that is wrong by any Linux and FS standard.

Another quote from TFA:

When clicking on "Books and magazines", there is a long list that is confused by the fact that 1) Some of the titles are not in English

Duuuhhhh, only a minority of people speak English, yes it is since the end of WWII the De Facto Lingua Franca of this world but why the hell would we translate everything in English?

Yes there are reasons to promote Free Software and this shop is clearly not doing it's part as seen from the Free Software movement.
But hey, it's run by a commercial entity, what else do you expect?
B.t.w, I'm more upset about the way Ubuntu (Shuttleworth) has recently been treating Jonathan Ridell and by proxy Kubuntu and KDE.
http://jriddell.org/2015/05/26...

Steve Jobs said two years ago that X is brain-damaged and it will be gone in two years. He was half right. -- Dennis Ritchie

Working...