Well, IBM also contributed to Nazi Germany technology in WW2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Also, this sure would qualify as processed food IMHO. We'd have to know how the whole process works, what substances are used to trigger things etc. I doubt that you put a cell in a reactor and that it starts growing by itself.

Anyway, wait and see seems like a nice strategy IMHO. Let the states who want to test it test it. Waiting at least a few decades to see the impacts on human health might be a good idea. How can they say that it's perfectly safe for human health without publishing their whole [most likely secret] industrial process?

As you might have noticed if you read my post, I didn't even look up nor try to compute the speed of light in water. This is a discussion about sharks with laser on their head duh!

I am sure there is a pretty big market for an XQJ-37 Pan-Sexual Roto-Plooker:
https://songmeanings.com/songs...

Maybe I'll buy some, 'eh?

Nah, light travels too slow in water. In the atmosphere although it's travels at about 99.9% c while in fiber it's slowed to ~66% c.

I am pretty sure you didn't use the same dosage TFA would suggest for medical use.

Is it like snitching and reporting on your users? Seriously asking. I didn't look any further.

Off topic and it doesn't make me look younger but with you highlighting it, his username reminds me of Joe 90:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Who knows? With his low uid, maybe Joe 90 inspired him when he chose his user name...

Pictures:
https://www.bing.com/images/se...

I couldn't help but notice the following formulation is TFS:

As I seem to recall it, it used to be something like: "Because of climate changes caused by humans".

The new formulation sounds much more scientific and credible IMHO so at least there is that.

I had a pretty good pinball game fitting on a single floppy disk. It was all in assembly and you had to boot the 8086 computer from the floppy disk to play the game so it used no operating system at all.

Sure, a computer will always use all the memory it has available in buffers/cache unless your drives are smaller than your RAM or you access less data on the drives than you have RAM. It's no indication that you couldn't have less memory and still have acceptable performances although.

I'll just settle for 24GB RAM

wrong link, here is the correct one:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/chin...

UN secretary-general is in China right now for that summit with Xi Jinping, Putin and Kim Jong Un to plan actions probably going against the interest of the western world, he isn't even trying to hide it anymore. It's no surprise that UN say China surpassed Japan IMHO
https://press.un.org/en/2024/s...

Why? Do you spiral left too? /s