Comment Re:Empirically (Score 1) 31
Them: Why don't you act your age?
Me: Well, I've never been this age before.
Them: Why don't you act your age?
Me: Well, I've never been this age before.
Like buying booze, renting a car, purchasing a handgun, buying a lottery ticket, getting a tatoo?
(some of these vary by state)
I don't see how you're too immature to order a Chianti with your steak dinner but you're mature enough to go $200K in debt based on a sales pitch of returns after investment.
These aren't even reasonable equivalents from a neuroscience perspective.
A read is supposed to be fine. At read time the firmware *should* rewrite the cell if the read is weak.
The firmware also *should* go out and patrol the cells when idle and it has power.
you can dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=2M once a year if your firmware behaves.
If your drive is offline you could
dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/sdX bs=2M iflag=fullblock conv=sync,noerror status=progress
to be sure, though write endurance is finite.
If you're running zfs you can 'zpool scrub poolname' to force validation of all the written data. This is most helpful when you can't trust the firmware to not be buggy crap. Which only applies to 90% of drive firmware out there.
Well 0-clicks and OTA attacks but yeah, to your point, device compromise lets you use apps on the device.
News at 11!
> I have found that streaming directly to my Plex home server over TLS is generally smoother without going through Wireguard. Not quite sure why.
I recently had to solve this.
Wireguard should work with a regular 1500byte MTU connection at 1440 or 1420 bytes (the default) --- however --- if your ISP is routing your IPv4 using 4-in-6 internally (like my major cable company) everything goes to hell.
Try dropping your wg MTU to 1360, MSS at 1320, and set up a mangle table to clamp MSS to PMTU (e.g. iptables rule).
I got a 10x bump in TLS over wireguard throughput.
Total pain in the ass and lightly documented.
Problems don't start showing until several months down the line for most things being promised.
Cite?
I'm not commenting on the quality of the cars simply the conflict of interest.
What conflict of interest? DCar Studio has money and wants advertising, the influencer wants money and can provide advertising. I see an alignment of interests, not a conflict.
The biggest pro for a Tesla used to be the charging network & Elon.
Now the charging network is open to many other EVs and the biggest con is Elon.
I continue to use burned DVDs for backing up the critical stuff. Not perfect, of course, but not electromechanically-failure prone like a hard disk drive, not "terms of service" failure prone like cloud storage, and not "the charge magically held in the gate leaked away" failure prone. I have optical discs over 25 years old which are still perfectly readable.
DVD-R? DVD+R? DVD+RW? Single or dual layer? Gold metallic layer? Silver metallic layer? How are they stored?
Depending on how you answer those questions, your 25 year-old media may be past due and you've just gotten lucky, may be just entering the timeframe where it may die, or may have decades of reliable life left.
DVD-R single layer disks with a gold metallic layer are good for 50-100 years. Other recordable DVD options are less durable, some as little as 5-10 years.
> These programs work well in intensely impoverished areas
[Citation needed]
I'm not saying you're wrong, or even that I disagree; But the catch here is that the places where this program presumably has the biggest impact are also the places where little to no data is available.
But also, if the OLPC are actually existing and being used... they have network connectivity. Presumably they need some form of internet to "give access to information that otherwise just wouldn't be there" if only intermittently or by proxy, which in turn should provide a way to collect usage statistics and/or track students in these hard to survey populations.
Either way you can't claim they work well in any population without actual data or reports to support that claim.
=Smidge=
Without knowing precisely how Explorer is structured, it's conceivable that there may be different dynamically-linked libraries and/or execution points for running the desktop and for the file explorer, in which case just having explorer.exe running in and of itself doesn't mean that new modules have to be loaded if explorer.exe process fires up. The solution could very well be to load the libraries involved in file browsing when the desktop opens.
Just guessing here. There was a time when there was a lot more horsepower required for GUI elements than folder browsing, but this is 2025, and explorer.exe probably uses orders of a magnitude more resources now than it did in 1995, because... well, who knows really. Probably to sell more ads and load up more data to their AI.
That, on modern hardware, they have to preload a fucking file browser so that it pops up faster is just an indication of what a steaming pile of garbage MS is. They had sweet spots with Win2k-WinXP and with Win7, but their incoherent need to be a whole bunch of contradictory things --- with AI! has led what was a rather iffy OS and UI experience to begin with to become a cluster fuck of incoherence.
I do most of my day to day work on MacOS and Gnome, and fortunately the Terminal services version I have to RDP into is Server 2016, but every time I have to work with Windows 11 I'm just stunned by just how awful it looks and how badly it behaves.
And I wouldnâ(TM)t bank on a paid email account not being used for AI scraping.
In Google's case, they're under quite a lot of FTC scrutiny, operating under two consent decrees, and they have an employee population that isn't known for keeping their mouths shut. It's possible that Trump's FTC might not act if he were paid off, but a leak would definitely generate a lot of press.
"I was a Unix admin before Linus wrote the first line of Linux. It still isn't ready for the desktop for 99% of people"
Would that matter? Apple has been "ready for the desktop" for 40 years and has never gone much above 15% market share. Android / ChromeOS are or could be desktop-ready yet where have those efforts gone?
Nothing fucking happened, BlueAnon clown.
So he was there.
Who said he wasn't?
Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. - Alan Turing