The Current Policies Scenario model assumes all policies globally are frozen at their current state, then projects from there. It's not realistic, and not worthy of a lot of upset.
A well-informed article on the misunderstanding here: https://www.sustainabilitybynu...
Many couples don’t believe they can afford to start a family. As the cost of living continues to balloon, this affects a couple’s ability to raise children comfortably. For those contemplating whether to have children, the mere cost of child care, which is an average of $15,600 per year, provokes questions of whether it is even feasible.
This is not just future generation's problem. Catastrophic lack of affordability for housing, healthcare, and childcare results in fewer kids, this in turn means that in 20 years there will be less adults working and paying taxes, in turn bankrupting social nets. So today's childlessness crisis will translate to tomorrow destitute seniors crisis.
Please let me clarify that I was tanking about Krafton and their AI innitiative specifically.
Seen many a comment, so I'll respond generically:
Your top performers are separated intwo groups, those who are genuinely excited to work with AI, and those who do not, with a very small group of "don't cares". Guess who stays and who leaves.
In the mid-range and low tier something similar occurs. Also, in those two populations the group of "don't cares" is much bigger.
This will self-select out the people that will either actively or passive-agressively oppose AI to leave on their own volition. And avoid mass layoffs which may attract scrutiny in SouthKorea specifically, and more generaly, worldwide.
Also, some people that were mid-tier before AI, may move up or down the tier list as AI is introduced. Good in both cases (the one who moved up became more productive and we keep, the ones who moved down are primed for the next round of layoffs).
Then you focus on the low tier workers post AI. Doing a "justifiable firing" case for those should be easy. If you achieve the desired employment levels, then mission acomplished. Otherwise:
Then comes the work-mobbing/slow firing of the mid-tier workers that were not smart enough to go on their own volition until you acquire satisfactoy employment levels.
Well lastI heard germany did not have bationvide 5g outside urnan atreas yet ( coreect me if my info is outdated j so their interrest in 6g, that AFaIK is not fully standardised yet, might be shal we say not that great
You do not need to achieve full nationwide blanked coverage in one of the Gs, before you start to deploy the next Gs, if there are customers who want the service, and are willing to pay reasonable rates for it.
And customers are not only you and me with our smartphones, is also consumers with wireless broadband, customers and companies with latency sensitive workloads (and 4G brought a reduction in latency, 5G brough even morem and 6G even more), companies which need network slicing, or companies which need energy savings @ a fixed Mbps (each digital G has lowered the pJoules per bit down significantly). Also, things like self driving cars, including cargo transportation platoons, companies which need network slicing, etc.
These are just a few examples of capabilities that will be enhanced in 6G.
And a few years behind Huawei. It will be the same as it was with 4G and 5G. Huawei first to market, each generation the lead extends, and later Western companies come along with their knock-offs and rely on national security concerns to get into the market.
Germans will have to wait for 6G, or maybe Nokia can do a deal to rebadge Huawei gear, stick their own OS on it or something.
I agree with you that Huawei was in the technical lead in 5G, and that lead will extend in 6G. but that lead is not sooo big. Depending on the specific area, I'd meassure that lead as less than 36 months tops, and that streches it.
Except for telcos that do the 6G rollouts in the 2029~2031 timeframe (which are few and far between), not really relevant...
The main issue is the cost advantage. With Huawei and ZTE being significantly less expensive than Nokia or E//.
In RF/BSS only Samsung is an alternative, cost-wise, from a big company. There are other alternatives, but at that point, you are assuming a risk if you are a small telco, or playing kingmaker if you are a large one.
As I said, In Servers (for the NFV core) Germany (and europe) have Jackshit domestic alternatives. In DCN (Data Comm Network), they only have Nokia, and in optical, they have Nokia or Adtran (IIRC, E// killed/ejected their DWDM dept).
So, less options == more price AND less flexibility.
Full disclosure: Was in Huawei's payroll in my country in the late '00s, and worked with them as an independent contractor in the mid '10s. Have kept up to date in the area, and still have contacts inside.
Imagine a truly valued employee watching one of his colleagues scoop up 3yrs of salary on his way out the door having been refused the package themselves because "wouldn't want to lose you". It's going to lead to some resentment unless they are also offering a 36 month retention bonus.
Agree 100% with you. Voluntary severance packages should be offered in a no questions asked first come first served basis.
If manglement* or HR can say no to a request, it means that trust is broken. Manglement KNOWS that the employee wants to leave, and the employees know that they know. This leads to the employee embarking in a mad race to find a new job, for fear of being fired, and manglement trying to replace the employee ASAP (for fear of them leaving). I'v seen it first hand, with a very gifted storage Sysadmin. It was not pretty.
While I despise AI initiatives in their current form, this is the way to do it.
You declare your AI intentions and lofty goals, then give the employees a decent (or, in this case substantial) voluntary resignation package.
No bad blood, and if you need to re-hire these people in the future, no burned bridges.
I hope more companies idd things like this.
JM2C
YMMV
I mean, both are Europeans, and Nokia has a slight touch of Germany
Also, they shall not be using Cisco, Juniper or Arista Routers (too USoAn). Lucky for them, Nokia has a router line inherited mostly from Alcatel.
But, things get realy nasty once we continue, they shall not be using Samsung RF or DWDM equipment(too Korean), even though it is the leader of low priced fiber, and in 5G RF (and probably in 6G too).
And for the NFVs (Network Function Virtualization) at the core of the network, they can not use HP/Dell servers (too USoAn again), no Lenovo Servers (too chinese), no ASUS/ACER/Supermicro servers (too Taiwanese),
And finally, no NEC and/or Stratus Technologies ft servers (too Japanese & USoAn) for the cloud controllers and critical servers...
Good luck with that 6G network.
Because it fell to the floor a short while after being unveiled, so, if the teacher in the "humanoid robot classroom" were reading the grades outloud would say: "Adol, F"
Nickels also cost more to make than the coin's worth, and the dollar bill deteriorates so fast, that a coin replacing it is the best option.
the 2 dollar bill can take it place in stipers thongs, as the minimum note.
Also, for coin operated vending machine convenience, ramping up minting of half dollar coins would be prudent.
Today, we are gonna learn how to bypass al security safeties with simple hand tools. We will need a breaker bar, a torque wrench and our safety glasses
Where have you been? On Windows, at least, the default is to view PDFs in Edge. If you install Chrome then the default changes to Chrome. There's no need for Adobe Reader anymore, and hasn't been in years.
Hold on to the root.
