Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:This is how democracy dies (Score 1) 88

Schools have school boards for local control and home schooling as a backstop to escape government intervention. You soon won't be able to escape presenting your government issued ID to an app to access the internet in the EU. I don't really care as long as identity doesn't leak to government to the service provider, but it will be inescapable without emigrating to a more free nation.

Comment Re:They are collecting the water, right? (Score 1, Interesting) 21

Your point is sneaky/snarky, but valid.  Dump the rain-water on purpose !! If Oman wanted sandy-clay-loam instead of sandy deserts  Sultan Haitham bin Tariq would have bought it 5 years ago ... or 10. Why wait for the flood? But, perhaps Oman does not want to have yeoman farmers bowing to Allah and His gifted wheat crops  ... NOT the Sultan. Money grubbing Western oilmen will kiss the Sultans ass for black gold while hoping  wheat seeds never leave Alberta.

Comment Re:We've done the experiment (Score 1) 160

Remove 230 and sites become liable for most of the abuses. Those sites don't have anything like the pockets of those abusing them.

Some sites do have the money: X, Facebook and the like. All the small sites (like Slashdot) don't and would be very likely to shut down.

Without Section 230, sites are more likely to be sued for moderating, not less. Section 230 protects "good faith" moderation.

Comment Re: We've done the experiment (Score 5, Insightful) 160

This; if a platform is informed of illegal behavior, they ought to have liability to take it down.

Clear, simple and utterly wrong. Who can report? Anyone? Who gets to decide if it is illegal? How quickly does the platform have to respond.

Look at how the Copyright takedown notices work today. Platforms are flooded with such notices, many of which come from sources unrelated to the copyright holder, or who misrepresent copyright ownership, or who ignore fair use. The result is that lots of items get taken down for bogus reasons.

Comment Re:We've done the experiment (Score 1) 160

Multiple examples of fraudulent coercion in elections, multiple examples of American plutocrats attempting to trigger armed insurrections in European nations, multiple "free speech" spaces that are "free speech" only if you're on the side that they support, and multiple suicides from cyberharassment, doxing, and swatting, along with a few murder-by-swatting events.

What makes you think that these will stop if Section 230 is repealed? In fact, what is likely to happen is that this type of "speech" will be the only thing left.

Perhaps you don't really understand Section 230?

Comment Re:US also used ~21GW for data-centers in 2024... (Score 3, Informative) 54

I wonder why in 2024, 92% (yes, ninety-two) of all power added to the grid worldwide was Wind and Solar, if it has so many disadvantages. And no, this was not mandated by some government. It was people in countries like Kenya or Pakistan buying some solar panels, loading them on their motorcycles and riding to their villages to mount them on roofs to get power independent from the big utilities. That's something you can't do with nuclear or geothermal.

If you want fast and cheap energy added to the grid, go Solar and Wind.

Comment Re:No surprise[s in today's SF?] (Score 1) 124

Possibly Iain M Banks? The Culture is such an optimistic view of the future, notwithstanding all the gruesome deaths?

And the concept of artificial hells (Surface Detail).

Iain Bans wrote one of the all-time great first lines in a novel:
"It was the day my grandmother exploded"

Comment Re:We've done the experiment (Score 3, Insightful) 160

Yes.

Let's be clear on the purpose of this campaign: Trump and the GOP have got control of the big platforms. Those big platforms can withstand the loss of Section 230.

Repealing Section 230 would result in thousands (millions?) of small platforms shutting down. Those big platforms don't want the competition and some (all?) of the GOP is on board with this, now that they control the big platforms.

Comment religion (Score 0) 26

Many countries had/have a state religion. Arab states  required Islamic teaching to all students -- even women --- while Brits DID require Anglican before OxBridge wimpwists took power, and Russia ... well 1st it's the Czar then Stalin no difference. Now the ol' USA chose the "golden calf" as their gawdhead, corn whisky /whales/ coal/oil were the incense. But, since Silicon Valley took over we've nothing left, but bits & bytes. All controlled by a  single massive computer stack that even the universities  worship. All hail the LLM ... may the nekbearded angelic hosts surround it and keep track of hallucinations that malloc didn't anticipate.

Slashdot Top Deals

I judge a religion as being good or bad based on whether its adherents become better people as a result of practicing it. - Joe Mullally, computer salesman

Working...