Comment Re:Or Herbicides (Score 1) 65
The tractor can't climb stairs.
The tractor can't climb stairs.
Schools have school boards for local control and home schooling as a backstop to escape government intervention. You soon won't be able to escape presenting your government issued ID to an app to access the internet in the EU. I don't really care as long as identity doesn't leak to government to the service provider, but it will be inescapable without emigrating to a more free nation.
Time to replace herbicides with lasers.
Remove 230 and sites become liable for most of the abuses. Those sites don't have anything like the pockets of those abusing them.
Some sites do have the money: X, Facebook and the like. All the small sites (like Slashdot) don't and would be very likely to shut down.
Without Section 230, sites are more likely to be sued for moderating, not less. Section 230 protects "good faith" moderation.
How many people can afford to sue Trump?
Nothing to do with the merits of the dispute, but the cost of Trump's litigation strategy.
This; if a platform is informed of illegal behavior, they ought to have liability to take it down.
Clear, simple and utterly wrong. Who can report? Anyone? Who gets to decide if it is illegal? How quickly does the platform have to respond.
Look at how the Copyright takedown notices work today. Platforms are flooded with such notices, many of which come from sources unrelated to the copyright holder, or who misrepresent copyright ownership, or who ignore fair use. The result is that lots of items get taken down for bogus reasons.
Multiple examples of fraudulent coercion in elections, multiple examples of American plutocrats attempting to trigger armed insurrections in European nations, multiple "free speech" spaces that are "free speech" only if you're on the side that they support, and multiple suicides from cyberharassment, doxing, and swatting, along with a few murder-by-swatting events.
What makes you think that these will stop if Section 230 is repealed? In fact, what is likely to happen is that this type of "speech" will be the only thing left.
Perhaps you don't really understand Section 230?
The Dems are sponsoring this repeal bill.
Thus showing how stupid some Dems (mostly the "establishment Democrats") are and why the Dems need some new blood.
If you want fast and cheap energy added to the grid, go Solar and Wind.
What abut Neal Stephenson? His books are a bit hit-and-miss. Snow Crash I found to be excellent, but Seveneves was just awful -- a waste of time that seemed designed merely to satisfy the author's interest in the physics of whips.
Possibly Iain M Banks? The Culture is such an optimistic view of the future, notwithstanding all the gruesome deaths?
And the concept of artificial hells (Surface Detail).
Iain Bans wrote one of the all-time great first lines in a novel:
"It was the day my grandmother exploded"
Yes.
Let's be clear on the purpose of this campaign: Trump and the GOP have got control of the big platforms. Those big platforms can withstand the loss of Section 230.
Repealing Section 230 would result in thousands (millions?) of small platforms shutting down. Those big platforms don't want the competition and some (all?) of the GOP is on board with this, now that they control the big platforms.
I judge a religion as being good or bad based on whether its adherents become better people as a result of practicing it. - Joe Mullally, computer salesman