Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Comment Re:War of choice (Score 1) 270

Did you mean pedophilic Demorats who support urban savage mayhem, narco-Mex mules ,  Muzziwog  fraudsters, buttfuckers and child rapists ? Those progressives ... enemies of the republic  yes indeed could well be slaughtered without any ill effects.   Actually the American yeomanry would benefit immensely from newly unfettered resources  as progressives tend to produce nothing of value while consuming food, housing and transportation.

Comment Re:What's the problem? (Score 1) 58

The JOKER is *.ai which can produce plausible-sounding tropes about anything. Discovering computer-code "bugs" is  just one example. No concern about the systematic value of the trope or the work load that report places on maintainers. What would you prefer: a "mans man" or butler  who calls-out the 743 things you do wrong every day or one who identifies by advising change to the four personal disasters ?

Comment Re:necessary (Score 1) 120

American consumers can "demand" whatever American farm & industry produce.  Use-it-here ... make-it-here. The industrial IP/history/capital/skills remain in America.  Excepting medical items, all other trade is either affectation ( womens shoes / Chinese GPUs  ) or political pander (Mexican Fords ). Like wise , American investors  who depend on American law/finance/military to generate  & conserve wealth can put their money where they live. 

Comment necessary (Score 1) 120

Removing Chinese made products from the American market is necessary , but not sufficient to protect our Angle-Western culture.  Globalist panders should understand that rigid tariff barriers are only a START to the required isolation from toxic influence, whether that influence is characterized as progressive, efficient, tolerant, collectivist, humanitarian, tyrannous or "nanny" statist. Consider Chinese trade a "coal-mine cannery" measuring corruption within Americas "estates general" ... or  fin-tekno-elite.

Comment Re:Haven't heard of? (Score 1) 24

by noshellswill (#66144563) Attached to: Writers Are Fleeing the Substack Tax
Nobody learns about Patreon watching UTube ... the text-string  "patreon" does appear, but what it does remains obscure ... thus unknown. The watcher/reader /listener of UTube has no contact whatsoever with patreon. What those other services/URLs/companies are/do remains a deeper mystery. I've never heard of them. A writer/website-builder etc who does use those services lives in a different universe than the viewer.

Comment Re:Use AI to make yourself think (Score 1) 120

by noshellswill (#66143111) Attached to: Software Developers Say AI Is Rotting Their Brains
Identifying <good> or <bad>  code/text/math/art  is a lower intellectual skill than generating <good> or <bad> code/text/math/art . See any "skills" hierarchy for details. Without doubt, use of code-producing *.ai  deskills coders, in a way analogous to CNC machines  deskilling  lathe-workers. If the task-at-point is repetitive and the output a commodity  then machine automation proves  doable, cheaper and perhaps higher quality. Otherwise an extended form of Godels Theorem applies. The craftsman in Ohio who hand-built  my  olive-wood curve-bladed pairing-knife set  remains secure . 

Comment Re:The Developer is dead - long live The Engineer (Score 1) 120

by noshellswill (#66142505) Attached to: Software Developers Say AI Is Rotting Their Brains
Who is so narrow-minded they believe language  translators are accountants? Surely not the people who translated  hieroglyphs ... Sanskrit ... cuneiform ... Linear-B etc.  Or who translate English into Russian during a nuclear confrontation ( we pray ...) .  So who then? Only  accountants ?

Comment Re:GPAs are trash, yet companies still filter on t (Score 1) 177

by noshellswill (#66141975) Attached to: Harvard Votes On Limiting 'A' Grades
You seem to believe exams have something to do with taught lecture material. Indeed:   Bloomfeld rules K-12 , but Piaget rules Uni. For high school exams you teach to the testing; at Uni exams measure combinatorial structures that almost by definition  never  were taught. So you expect  (optimistically ) only 13% of a population gets their BS.  Other than self-interest, why does Harvard ignore well documented performance constraints?  Is frustration generosity?  So what about everyone else ? Simple.  Their < Best Money = B$ = best life > comes from their doing whatever pattern-matching or sensation  they do best ... whatever it is combinatorial logic does not rule. Really you can tell over-educated people all year  ... that Steinmetz did the maths while Einstein rowed against the bow wave ... and get back nothing , but a blank stare or contempt.

Comment market (Score 1) 65

by noshellswill (#66141615) Attached to: Why Are Some People Mosquito Magnets?
In-the-day, moving to a SC barrier island over-run with mosquitos I learned the trick locals used.  Somebody needs to buy Skin-So-Soft ! If you took the SSS "bath" bugs would gather like a cloud, but never land on your skin; absolute miracle ! Think of the investors.

Slashdot Top Deals

The world is moving so fast these days that the man who says it can't be done is generally interrupted by someone doing it. -- E. Hubbard

Close