From your replies it seems you read at most 10% of the words.
Let's be perfectly clear here: you're going to accuse me of having failed to read with understanding unless I agree with whatever it is you want
No. You are inserting your beliefs here. Your beliefs have no basis in reality this time.
More importantly you have already admitted in multiple ways to having not actually read it. Why you insist on lying in the face of your own statements is not clear.
IOW, this is not an actual dialogue.
How can we have a dialogue on a text that you refuse to read? If I did the same about one of your blog posts you would respond the same way would you not?
In fact I expect you would have been just as well off finding a Mandarin translation from the original German, and then attempt to read it in a mirror while gargling hydrogen peroxide and juggling flaming chainsaws.
How would such an arrangement have affected the fundamental sucktacularity of the material in any way?
You would then have a physical excuse for not reading it as you would be physically impeded from doing so. Now you have the text in front of you in a (presumably) readable fashion and are explicitly choosing not to read it.