Maybe I'm just a weirdo but I am very annoyed at them for trying to take away the option of local-only accounts. Why do I need to let them be a third party to everything I do starting with logging in? Nobody asked for this.
At this stage, the best way forward is to apply the "Debian" patch to your system to restore local accounts, and strip out the all the daft AI guff
I saw an interview with Linus Torvalds the other day, and he seems to think Nvidias getting better behaved with its drivers now (although my understanding is he's not as fussed by closed source drivers as others are in the industry).
Nvidia are shits though. I know they used to maintain a CUDA implementation for macs. Now? Nope...
As are the GPUs on both the mainstream major gaming consoles (PS5 and Xbox). AMD GPUs arent going anywhere, especially now that their AI picture is starting to come a bit more into focus
Eh. To some value of yes and some value of no.
The library aint nearly as large, but surprisingly a lot of it is there. But don't expect it to be equivelent to a frebreathing 64 core Ryzen 9 with 5090 GPU. Obviously.
If Googles teeth-grindingly stupid AI is what it takes to kill this stupid bubble, well I'll grit my teeth and go along with it.
Because I really feel like I'm in the stupidest industry right now. And thats not what I signed up for 30 years ago.
In a foreign country, you have to follow their laws, just as foreign businesses must do in the US.
I generally agree with this. But I dont think apple is saying they will break the law, but rather that they'd just wIthdraw from the market if forced, which has been their approach in the past.
Plus, while india is a big market, apples 10% of it probably isnt a huge segment of apples revenue, and they have the warchest to just sit it out until Gen Zs flip out hard enough to force the govt to back off.
Yeah I wanna know this too. This is pretty alarming.
Guess thats what happens when you trust a google project.....
No, actually theres plenty of studies. You have to look first if you want to know!
Look up "watching eye effect supermarket" in google scholar or your academic search engine of choice. Theres literally hundreds of studies.
Too bad Australia's court hold zero sway over these social media companies and their fines mean nothing.
If they do business here, they have an office here, servers here and have legal liabilities here. Just like any business.
All the major social media companies dont just have offices here, they have datacenters, or major presences in data centers, here. More than that, they have clients here, and like any company that gets fined, if they dont pay those fines, the courts just *take* the money.
Don't be naive.
You speak with the bias of a person who has experienced a life of multiple hobbies and multiple possibilities and dismiss very legitimate concerns. For people who are actually addicted to shit like social media things can get very nasty indeed.
Thats who the legislation is for. Break the damn screen addiction.
As whacky as the research sounds, theres precedents, albeit less funny ones.
Back in the 1980s where I lived, supermarkets used to always stick cardboard cutouts of policemen around the shop, cross-armed and staring. Apparently those where really effective.
Nobody actually thought it was a real policeman staring, but the psychological effect was enough that people felt too *observed* to actually go and do the crimes. I can only assume what this shows is it doesnt really matter what the authoritarian figure is , be he commissioner gordon, or batman, its enough to make people feel anxious about wanting to do good, or rather to be SEEN as doing good.
As the philosopher foucault observed, panopticon doesnt work by the prison guards doing the discipline, but the discontinuous sense of being observed made the prisoners discipline themselves.
The uranium has never been the expensive part of nucllear.
its building the bloody thing. The reality is nuclear is stil one of the most expensive forms of power out there whilst solar and wind (Especially in australia) are by far the cheapest. Its kind of weird to ignore the obvious solution to go for a plan that wont even come online until a decade after the solution is due.
Its only real flaw with the latest tech is the pacing, but it doesn't take much for a human to correct that. It's not at all what I'd call slop
Its objectively slop and the best models sound dead and lifeless. What *I* want is for Voice artists to still have the career they've been slaving their asses off to still exist. Your not going to get the traumatized performance of Astarion collapsing with grief after killing the vampire who enslaved him, without Neil Newbon drawing on his own experience of trauma, or even the narators snarky delivery without a voice actor whos spent her life playing D&D with absolutely diabolocial nerds informing her subtle intonations and knowing delivery. All you hear in AI performances is
It is the very definition of slop.
If its true, then.... well yeah.
And we'll almost certainly get a better name for it than "Phrase which confuses non scientists into thinking scientists have an unprovable theory when scientists literally called it that to indicate that actually, they really dont have a theory yet, or more concisely 'dark matter' "
Where, prey tell, do you think humans get the vast majority of their "knowledge" in 2025?
I had a person yelling at me online this morning because I had the gall to point out that the only way vaccines could cause autism would be using time travel (your born with autism, clearly something that happens to you after you are born can't cause something that happened to you before you without a time machine of some sort), and it struck me that actually the internet IS how a lot of people are "learning" and its making people incredibly stupid.
"Nuclear war can ruin your whole compile." -- Karl Lehenbauer
