What other industries have stipulations like this. If I'm a home modeller and I remodel my own house can my employer claim that my house is now theirs?

you and at most a few others would have to get together and form a legal entity that could then hold that copywright. We could call it a grouporation or a cooperative relationship or something. You'll probably want to make sure you have someone to manage the inventors and some people to help find other talented inventors so you may want to make a people resources department. You'll need to take in some money to get everything started and you'll want some people that can manage it for you so you'll want to hire some money counting people. You'll want to sell your invention so maybe you could have a whole depart^H^H^H^H^Hsection of product price negotiator people. You'll probably want more people to help manage some of these things too. Just as long as it's not a corporation that holds these patents and copywrites.

especially if you consider that that data is likely encrypted somewhere along the line anyway. Just transmitting something over the internet probably has an encrypted hop somewhere.

I can do what ever I want as long as I am not a vessel for pumping warm water up peoples asses? There is far to much ambiguity in your brevity.

I'm not a religious hating atheist, but I am an atheist. I don't think you have hit it even close. Perhaps worded:

"Still, if you have come to this conclusion, then you have done something very right, and most people do manage that much. Although, history has shown that occasionally some people can twist the message for selfish and evil gains."

As I said, we only get one example and it is poor. If we could get rid of that we could possibly get many more examples and see which ones work and which ones don't.

i would give you 50 examples of varying degrees of workable schools but the DOE kinda screwed that up so we only have once chance of finding the right way of doing something.

Google maps with trip pre-caching turned on.

I'm torn:

On the one hand I am all for people paying according to their risk to the insurance company. If this proves to the company that you are a lower (or higher) risk to adjust payment correctly then it makes sense.

On the other hand I really don't like the idea of someone tracking my every movement, government or not it's an invasion from big brother.

Anyway should my driving history prove a little better my ability to drive. Just because I take corners fast or brake hard doesn't necessarily mean 'I' am a risk. Perhaps my overall skill is better than most. (hypothetical "my skill" I consider myself pretty average for someone with 20+ years of driving experience)

Exactly!! This is like buying a car with an engine included when I already have an engine at home that I plan to use with the new car. I should be able to demand a refund for the unneeded bundled engine.