Comment Re:Nooooo! (Score 1) 34
I'd say don't give him any ideas, but republicans have already suggested it, and after demolishing the east wing, all bets are off. He's just meglomanical enough to try.
I'd say don't give him any ideas, but republicans have already suggested it, and after demolishing the east wing, all bets are off. He's just meglomanical enough to try.
Israel should be able to do war crimes because america does war crimes is lizard brain logic. both countries need to cut it out.
Maybe I'm just a weirdo but I am very annoyed at them for trying to take away the option of local-only accounts. Why do I need to let them be a third party to everything I do starting with logging in? Nobody asked for this.
At this stage, the best way forward is to apply the "Debian" patch to your system to restore local accounts, and strip out the all the daft AI guff
Like letting people make their own choices? How is letting someone choose to sell or eat a Slim Jim immoral?
Because the processed food companies deliberately design their products to be as addictive as possible. As a society we (correctly) recognize that drug dealers bear some responsibility when users overdose on drugs, and cigarette companies have lost lawsuits because they knowingly sold an addictive and dangerous product while pretending it was perfectly healthy. Processed food companies are doing the same, even deliberately targeting children. Their products may not be *as* harmful as drugs or cigarettes, but they are still harmful and deliberately addictive, and they ought to bear some of the social responsibility for the damage their product has done (since they reaped **all** the profits). "Privatize the profits, socialize the losses" has been going on for a looooong time in this country, and it's pushed this country to (and perhaps past) it's breaking point. Freedom of choice is all well and good, but it requires people to be properly informed, and to actually have a choice (which many people, especially those living in food deserts, who tend to be poor and not well educated to begin with, do not).
Perhaps you should just grow up.
I saw an interview with Linus Torvalds the other day, and he seems to think Nvidias getting better behaved with its drivers now (although my understanding is he's not as fussed by closed source drivers as others are in the industry).
Nvidia are shits though. I know they used to maintain a CUDA implementation for macs. Now? Nope...
As are the GPUs on both the mainstream major gaming consoles (PS5 and Xbox). AMD GPUs arent going anywhere, especially now that their AI picture is starting to come a bit more into focus
Eh. To some value of yes and some value of no.
The library aint nearly as large, but surprisingly a lot of it is there. But don't expect it to be equivelent to a frebreathing 64 core Ryzen 9 with 5090 GPU. Obviously.
If Googles teeth-grindingly stupid AI is what it takes to kill this stupid bubble, well I'll grit my teeth and go along with it.
Because I really feel like I'm in the stupidest industry right now. And thats not what I signed up for 30 years ago.
In a foreign country, you have to follow their laws, just as foreign businesses must do in the US.
I generally agree with this. But I dont think apple is saying they will break the law, but rather that they'd just wIthdraw from the market if forced, which has been their approach in the past.
Plus, while india is a big market, apples 10% of it probably isnt a huge segment of apples revenue, and they have the warchest to just sit it out until Gen Zs flip out hard enough to force the govt to back off.
Yeah I wanna know this too. This is pretty alarming.
Guess thats what happens when you trust a google project.....
No, actually theres plenty of studies. You have to look first if you want to know!
Look up "watching eye effect supermarket" in google scholar or your academic search engine of choice. Theres literally hundreds of studies.
Too bad Australia's court hold zero sway over these social media companies and their fines mean nothing.
If they do business here, they have an office here, servers here and have legal liabilities here. Just like any business.
All the major social media companies dont just have offices here, they have datacenters, or major presences in data centers, here. More than that, they have clients here, and like any company that gets fined, if they dont pay those fines, the courts just *take* the money.
Don't be naive.
You speak with the bias of a person who has experienced a life of multiple hobbies and multiple possibilities and dismiss very legitimate concerns. For people who are actually addicted to shit like social media things can get very nasty indeed.
Thats who the legislation is for. Break the damn screen addiction.
Egotist: A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me. -- Ambrose Bierce