Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:"...the same as trespassing." (Score 1) 1170 1170

One item you excluded is that "physical force" does *not* included deadly force. Deadly force is defined in 503.010 (1), and is distinct and separate from 503.010 (4) which defines physical force.

Except there can't be deadly force executed on something that can't be killed. I bet the courts will ultimately rule that the drone is a person by proxy in this regard. These are monumental violations of private property and privacy. I don't know if Kentucky has recording consent laws, but in many states you cannot be recorded in a place of expected privacy without explicit permission from both parties.

Comment Re:"...the same as trespassing." (Score 3, Informative) 1170 1170

KRS 503.080
Protection of property
(1) The use of physical force by a defendant upon another person is justifiable when the defendant believes that such force is immediately necessary to prevent: (a) The commission of criminal trespass, robbery, burglary, or other felony involving the use of force, or under those circumstances permitted pursuant to KRS 503.055, in a dwelling, building or upon real property in his possession or in the possession of another person for whose protection he acts

KRS 503.085
Justification and criminal and civil immunity for use of permitted force –Exceptions
(1) A person who uses force as permitted in KRS 503.050, 503.055, 503.070, and 503.080 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom the force was used is a peace officer, as defined in KRS 446.010, who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law, or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a peace officer. As used in this subsection, the term "criminal prosecution" includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.

Comment It's the facility's responsibility (Score 1) 227 227

Asking people to comply is a dumb policy and doesn't work. It's the facility's responsibility to maintain security. At the Pentagon, for instance, you can barely get a cell signal once you're in the walls because the building materials block the signals. There are a few spots where you can get a reliable signal, but for the most part if you're not by a window(and there aren't many), you're basically not getting access. On top of that rather natural effect, they sweep for broadcast wifi signals and such and you're required to turn in electronics when you walk into certain secure areas(and they will check you in those areas).

Comment Re:The project known as F-35 (Score 2) 843 843

It's a first generation multirole stealth fighter(the F-117 is not a fighter and the F-22 is not multirole). The F-4(again, a first generation multirole fighter) was a boondoggle when it first released as well, and took many many variants to get right. The lessons learned on the F-4 turned directly into the F-14, F-15, F-16, and F/A-18.

1000 pains = 1 Megahertz

Working...