Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:OPT OUT (Score 1) 564

by eth1 (#39045695) Attached to: Female Passengers Say They Were Targeted For TSA Body Scanners

I do this, and take the opportunity to tell the TSA guy that he really ought to do some Google searches for "terahertz radiation" if he's going to be exposed to it all day. So far all the guys I've said that too seemed interested, perhaps more so because I was actually friendly and not calling them sexual predators like most people seem to. If they won't stand next to those machines, those machines can't be there.

Go one step further and suggest that there might be a big pay day if it turns out they were exposed to something dangerous. Nothing like a little greed to get thing moving...

Comment: Re:OPT OUT (Score 1) 564

by eth1 (#39045659) Attached to: Female Passengers Say They Were Targeted For TSA Body Scanners

This is a non-violence approach as best as Ghandi himself would have come up with. If the everyone opted for a pat down, then there would be massive queues as the TSA sods could not keep up with the folks in line, that gives them bad press - which is the last thing they want coming up to an election.

A possibly more effective solution: Refuse to fly. Take a bus, take a train, drive, or forgo travel, but don't pay into the system by buying a plane ticket.

So instead of buying a ticket and at least getting something for my money, I'm forced to pay into the system via tax dollars when the airlines get bailed out?

Comment: Re:massive battery hog = massive failure. (Score 4, Interesting) 306

by eth1 (#38999493) Attached to: Tesla Reveals Its Model X Gullwing SUV

So can I jump in one of these and expect to drive at a steady 70mph for over 300 miles? If it can't, then it can't replace my diesel car.

I don't care if it can do 0-60 in 4.5 seconds. I *do* care if it can do 0 to 250 miles in 4.5 hours.

You wouldn't replace your diesel car with a gas or diesel SUV, either, would you (unless you need the space)?

This is a soccer mom vehicle. They don't drive 70mph for 300 miles. They drive 30-50 mph for lots of small trips, which is what an electric is really good for. Think of this as an electric replacement for gas-hog SUVs, and it makes more sense.

Comment: Re:Because everyone needs a gullwing suv (Score 2) 306

by eth1 (#38999397) Attached to: Tesla Reveals Its Model X Gullwing SUV

Who cares what kind of doors it has? The important thing is that it's electric and has the seating of a large SUV.

The soccer mom crowd doesn't need long range for ferrying family around, so this would be a great market, and would get a lot of gas guzzlers off the street if they can shave another 20-30k off of the price. The current tiny all-electrics would be terrible for lots of kids, multiple car seats, etc.

Comment: Re:If they were manned aircraft would it be an iss (Score 1) 294

by eth1 (#38982413) Attached to: FAA Bill Authorizes Surveillance Drones Over US

Exactly. This has to do with unmanned aircraft, which is entirely orthogonal to surveillance aircraft.

Personally, I'd like to see unmanned cargo flights; there's no real reason why every UPS/FedEx plane needs any human beings on it at all. (Of course, I supposed that would have ruined the movie Castaway).

captcha: "airmail". heh.

Also, the fall from the UPS delivery drone to my front yard would probably be more gentle than the current treatment...

Comment: Re:So? (Score 1) 486

by eth1 (#38967611) Attached to: Pasadena Police Encrypt, Deny Access To Police Radio

Police radios are intended for tactical communication & coordination. There's normally little on there that would require covering up.

As a volunteer with my local PD, we were trained on the radios, and golden rule was, "Assume anything you say on the radio today will be on YouTube or the national news tomorrow." They already will use the issued cell phones or the chat/IM on their computers for anything sensitive or potentially embarrassing unless it's time critical.

So they sort of have to worry about what they say, but not enough to really matter. At least the radio traffic is recorded, unlike the cell phones.

Comment: Re:So? (Score 1) 486

by eth1 (#38967485) Attached to: Pasadena Police Encrypt, Deny Access To Police Radio

The way the police are headed recently we need every single control and check possible over what they say and do. Letting them censor their own communications is a bad idea.

*Everything* the police does should be made public. If it was up to me I'd have every public servant walking around with a video camera on his shoulder recording everything they say/do. We need to watch the watchmen.

OTOH, yes, letting criminals listen in real time isn't good - it helps them get away. There's a better solution then 'encrypt everything' though...

In my city, most of that sensitive stuff isn't put on the radio in the first place. It all goes encrypted to the computers in their cars.

I have in the past heard police radio traffic that broadcast people's name, DOB, SSN, and all sorts of other identifying information (trying to verify a warrant) in the clear, so encryption wouldn't necessarily only benefit the police.

Comment: Re:Easy fix. (Score 1) 159

by eth1 (#38920255) Attached to: Did North Korea Conduct Secret Nuclear Tests?

1) Nuke the North
2) Blame it on fusion experimentation
3) ???
4) PROFIT!

Though I expect you are joking, I do expect the US and ROK have been exploring these options for years -- considering if it would work and how China would react. The North Korean leaders are clearly the most despicable exploiters of the human race the world has seen in generations, but China likes to have them as a buffer. Possibly also fearing the economy and military of a unified Korea.

Can't you trace radioactive residue somehow (ratios of isotopes, or something like that) after the fact? That might make that scheme difficult unless we can get some of their own nuclear material to build the bomb out of.

Comment: Re:How about something eveyrone would get use out (Score 1) 756

by eth1 (#38869541) Attached to: What If the Apollo Program Never Happened?

Bullet trains just don't make sense in the US. In, for example, Japan, there are fewer metropolitan areas, so transportation that's limited to a few high-traffic routes makes sense. There are too many combinations of origins and destinations here for anything but an insanely expensive and huge train network to be useful.

We'd be better off with a network of short-haul auto-trains built in the interstate highway right-of-way. Hop on just south of Dallas, for example, and get off at Waco, get back on the next section if you're going all the way to Austin. (basically a commuter train for cars) Bonus if you can charge electric cars on the train (suddenly that 100mi range doesn't seem so bad). This gets existing gasoline-powered cars off the road, and means that it's still useful even if it doesn't go exactly where you're coming from or going to.

Comment: Re:What's the point of these? (Score 1) 273

by eth1 (#38868429) Attached to: Shmoocon Demo Shows Easy, Wireless Credit Card Fraud

What they should be doing is putting a chip on the card that contains a private key (which you can't read from the card). Plug the card into the POS system, and the POS system uploads the transaction information, the card attaches your account number and signs it, then returns it to the POS system which can then forward it to the bank.

Doesn't help if someone physically steals the card, but any sort of "skimming" would be impossible. (unless it's using a gimmicked point-of-sale system that's fiddling with the transaction information before it's signed, but if the card could display merchant name & amount, that would take care of that, too)

Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we diet.

Working...