Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:I'm Optimistic (Score 1) 816

Best thing about this: The Holiday Special is going to eventually be released now on DVD, then in a 'Special Edition'. Disney can also blackmail Ford into appearing in the reboot - "What's that, Mr. Ford? You're not interested in appearing? Very well. As an alternative, would you like to team up with Bruce Vilanch to provide commentary on the Special Edition?"

Comment: Re:€ (euro) (Score 1) 868

by TastelessGarbage (#34961782) Attached to: I'd rather my paycheck be denominated in ...

I'm working on a payroll globalization project for Very Large Company. One reason employees want the option of cheques is to receive bonus/special payouts that they don't have to disclose to their significant other.

Cheques will be around for some years to come. Many of us will live to see their eventual elimination on 'security' grounds, though.

Businesses

World of Goo Creators Try Pick-Your-Price Experiment 216

Posted by Soulskill
from the in-for-a-penny-in-for-ten-bucks dept.
2D Boy, the independent game studio behind World of Goo, recently celebrated the game's one-year anniversary by offering it at whatever price buyers cared to pay. They've now released some sales statistics about how people responded to the opportunity. The average price during the sale was $2.03; the game normally retails for $20. According to a survey of why people paid what they did, 22.4% said it was all they could afford at the time, and 12.4% said they already owned World of Goo and were buying it for a different platform. (Yes, there is a Linux version.) Over 57,000 people took advantage of the offer, which was enough for 2D Boy to term it "a huge success." Interestingly, they also saw a significant increase in sales through Steam, and a smaller increase through Wiiware. They've decided to extend the experiment until October 25th.

Comment: Odometer reading will not work... (Score 1) 792

by jwhitener (#29433129) Attached to: Congress Mulls Research Into a Vehicle Mileage Tax

At least for a state gas tax. You can't read the odometer and determine what percent of your driving day was in Oregon versus Washington state. Therefore a mileage tax wouldn't work.

They've been pushing for this in Oregon for a while now. As I understand it, the GPS unit isn't a black box, and a lot of time has been put into privacy concerns. I think one solution had it being read at the pump, and then immediately deleting its contents after being read. Very limited range transmission, it only recorded miles/location, and the location was just 'oregon' or 'not oregon'.

However, for a Federal gas tax, I have no idea why'd they'd want to implement GPS. Odometer reading would work just fine. Just have a tax applied to your tag renewal each year based on miles driven.

Either way, I hope they still have some differences in tax amounts based on vehicle size and weight. I shouldn't have to pay as much as a Semi Truck.

Comment: Re:toposhaba (Score 1) 792

by profplump (#29431797) Attached to: Congress Mulls Research Into a Vehicle Mileage Tax

This is what we do for sales tax, and it seems to work just fine -- there are many cases where sales tax might not apply, and it's up to the purchaser to have the appropriate paperwork to avoid being charged. There are methods both to certify and exemption in an attempt to avoid being charged, and to obtain a refund in the case that tax was improperly collected.

It's also more or less the same system we have for income tax; the IRS assumes that all of your income is subject to taxation unless you provide specific evidence to the contrary.

I'm not saying it would be fun, but it's a pretty standard way to collect taxes -- assume everything is taxable and let individual taxpayers try to justify the reason that some of their activities should not be taxable.

Comment: Re:Stability (Score 1) 891

by DocHoncho (#29403077) Attached to: Why Users Drop Open Source Apps For Proprietary Alternatives

I believe what they are asking for would be equivalent to Draft mode in Word 2007. I think it used to be called something else in previous versions. It's basically a text editor view instead of the simulated page view which shows margins and whatnot.

I can hardly imagine why the lack of such a feature is a "deal breaker."

Comment: Re:Excellent, but apple isn't the first! (Score 1) 342

by pohl (#29402959) Attached to: Apple Open Sources Grand Central Dispatch

Of course you are right to caution against the evils of the marketing literature. That's a good thing to remind people of. God knows I never tire of hearing it. Clearly your goal here is to prevent people from believing things about this technology that are not true, and that is laudable.

That is my goal too. My only skin in this game was to make sure that nobody assumed that the Apple C blocks extension was a necessary part of GCD and its use. A naive reader might have read your emphatic claim that "GCD from the programmers point of view within their application IS BLOCKS!", and left the thread not knowing that GCD can also be useful without these smalltalkish additions to C.

Sure, a lot of the real power of GCD rests on these closures, but not all applications need that sort of thing. Sometimes one is blessed with not having to share state among concurrent operations.

Whatever point you were trying to make didn't matter to me, because your whole rant seemed to be based upon a straw-man argument: wherein you would have us believe that someone claimed that apple invented the thread pool or closures or something.

I couldn't find where anyone actually made such claims, so I was tuning out everything except for those things that might misinform people about the system that was open sourced yesterday.

With all the fancy scientists in the world, why can't they just once build a nuclear balm?

Working...