Good joke, but you left out the balloon. The $207-billion balloon?

Just using the number from the story. The actual AI balloon is MUCH bigger than that.

Mostly the ACK, but I largely see it as a motivational problem. The people who want money are strongly motivated and the people who just want to get along or even just want to help other people are relatively weakly motivated. It sort of worked when their ambitions for more money were sane, but at this point they have fallen off the edge of insanity.

Leading to my (crazy) conclusion of the incommensurables:

infinity << money << time << infinity

Thanks for the clarification.

(More typos, however. Tends to make it harder to read your intentions and might even encourage some people to discount your comments.)

My main delusion remains solutions. For example, what if negative moderation reduced the moderator's likelihood of getting more mod points to squander in driving the mood into the mud? More difficult to implement, but comments with constructive suggestions or encouragement should make it more likely that identity will receive mod points to bestow. I think it would be nice to lighten the mood around here. (Then again, perhaps dark moods are the only reasonable reactions to the age of Donaldian Decadence?)

Right, I didn't. Apparently ditto the moderators.

And you didn't motivate any curiosity, then or now.

We know it weakly interacts electromagnetically, which means one of the ways in which it is posited planets form, initially via electrostatic attraction of dust particles, isn't likely to work. This means dark matter will be less "clumpy" and more diffuse, and less likely to create denser conglomerations that could lead to stellar and planetary formation.

What this finding does suggest, if it holds true, is that some form of supersymmetry, as an extension fo the Standard Model is true. Experiments over the last 10-15 years have heavily constrained the masses and energy levels of any supersymmetry model, so it would appear that if this is the case, it's going to require returning to a model that some physicists had started to abandon.

If people trust Google to keep them anonymous (which I wouldn't), apartment complex reviews are gonna get a lot more spicy. As it is, you only get reviews from ex-residents and morons.

More like an anti-solution to me. I almost never use File Explorer. On those rare occasions, it does not bother me to wait for a few seconds while it loads.

Me thinks that the real reason for making it resident is the greater convenience of Microsoft. Probably for some secretive tool that is harvesting my PI for Microsoft's greater glory and profit. Not visibly, of course, but using File Explorer in the background. (Any other comments along such lines?)

Better than the usual FP contribution from an AC, but I'm not getting your point and sure wouldn't moderate the FP interesting or funny (if'n I ever had a mod point to give). Perhaps you care to clarify (and even offer a more focused title)?

I do have some complicated thoughts on the topic. Maybe I'm even qualified as a resident of Tokyo to care about the problem? Calls for my ancient and little used sociologist's hat, however... But I really wish I had studied more psychology.

But I can reduce my answer to my stomach. I like Indian/Nepali food and I like trying new restaurants. I also like "atmospheric" coffee shops. (And sometimes I like to try something else.) I'm pretty sure I'm never going to run out of new places to try in Tokyo. However I'm pretty sure that would be true for many of the largest cities in the world... (AI angle via reviews?)

So how about the flip side of the coin? Why are so many people so strongly motivated to move into large cities? And on that side of the ledger things look really strange in Japan...

A few days ago there was a major fire that consumed about 170 buildings. That was in a small town far from Tokyo. However many of the buildings were empties. They call that an "akiya" for empty house. I've heard an estimate of around 100 empties destroyed in the fire. It's not just that no one wanted to live those vacant homes, and that there are places that will actively encourage people to live in vacant homes, but in this case it's worse. If those empty homes had been removed the rest of the community would still be there. Apparently they were the main source of kindling that made the fire so bad.

Another angle on the extreme demographic concentration. From the central part of Tokyo it is possible to walk to a suburb named West Tokyo. Takes about an hour on foot. Not long ago a bear was sighted in West Tokyo... Yesterday's news included a story about capturing (and killing) an extremely large bear near another town... Kind of like a war now, though I don't trust my (AI) source for this next item: Have the few remaining (and mostly quite elderly) bear hunters actually killed more than 4,200 bears in Japan this year? Actually seems quite possible. Nothing else to stop the bear population from increasing. They only look cute and fuzzy when they are quite young. But there was another story on the news about eating bear meat...

Combining the three branches? At least the bears rarely break into empty houses. No food smells. And so far I haven't heard of any bear sightings in the central parts of Tokyo... So in conclusion lots of people move to Tokyo because they like food and dislike bears?

Without knowing precisely how Explorer is structured, it's conceivable that there may be different dynamically-linked libraries and/or execution points for running the desktop and for the file explorer, in which case just having explorer.exe running in and of itself doesn't mean that new modules have to be loaded if explorer.exe process fires up. The solution could very well be to load the libraries involved in file browsing when the desktop opens.

Just guessing here. There was a time when there was a lot more horsepower required for GUI elements than folder browsing, but this is 2025, and explorer.exe probably uses orders of a magnitude more resources now than it did in 1995, because... well, who knows really. Probably to sell more ads and load up more data to their AI.

That, on modern hardware, they have to preload a fucking file browser so that it pops up faster is just an indication of what a steaming pile of garbage MS is. They had sweet spots with Win2k-WinXP and with Win7, but their incoherent need to be a whole bunch of contradictory things --- with AI! has led what was a rather iffy OS and UI experience to begin with to become a cluster fuck of incoherence.

I do most of my day to day work on MacOS and Gnome, and fortunately the Terminal services version I have to RDP into is Server 2016, but every time I have to work with Windows 11 I'm just stunned by just how awful it looks and how badly it behaves.

Was that an AI generated joke driven by an old timer, or has the old timer (4-digit UID) passed away and the identity been hijacked by an AI generating it's own joke? Seems to be a lot of that going around these years...

It's the first name that reveals the joke. Aidan = AI Dan. The Toner-Rodgers bit might be some kind of joke about permission to laser print?

But it reminds me of another oldie:

Anything you can do, AI can do better. AI can do anything better than me. (There was a musical (later made into a movie) about a gun...)

YouTube at the top? Followed by Facebook? It's like a ranking of the worst in the world, though I'm surprised how quickly it tapers down.

Profits are right and might makes right, so might equals profits? Where does the 500-pound google gorilla sleep? With the fishes, but only if it wants to?

So much for the attempted humor. I'm innocent, I say. It's like attempted murder, right?

In conclusion, right doesn't make right, but the "winners" write the history books and they always write that they were right. Infinity money time infinity and have a nice incommensurable day.

The capacity of the government of a large jurisdiction like California, or more particularly the US, could bankrupt someone like Musk, so I say, bring it on. Within a decade Musk would have abandoned all efforts, or, even better, be stone cold broke (frankly billionaires shouldn't exist at all, and we should tax the living fuck out of them down to their last $200 million).

We're too afraid of these modern day Bond villains when we should be aiming every financial, and probably every real, cannon straight at them and putting them in a sense of mortal danger every minute of their waking lives, so that they literally piss themselves in terror at the though that "we the people" might decide to wipe them out for good.