Maybe they're just fucking idiots, with an IT department that either is utterly inept or had been so marginalized by MBA morons and sociopaths.
Where do Zuckerberg and Ellison fit into this Lucasian demonology?
For various medical reasons, not every child can have particular vaccines, so these children are put at risk when herd immunity is compromised.
The state doesn't own them either, but until they are the age of majority, the courts have a longstanding obligation to assure their safety.
If you don't like it, leave.
You don't own your kids, period. If you endanger them, the courts will take charge. Not vaccinating them is endangering them.
The courts order children to undergo other medical care even where the parents object. Why are vaccinations any different?
ACtually, there are plenty of cases when parents and guardians have had their rights over their children stripped. REad up on JW's and blood transfusions.
Your children are not your property. You are entrusted with your well being, until such time as you demonstrate that you cannot be trusted in this manner.
It might work for PCs, but as we can see, the whole thing has failed for RT. The market share is so infinitesimal that even giving it away with methods to say, install it on Nexus 7, probably are doomed to failure.
Some kids cannot have the vaccines. Herd immunity protects them from this diseases. What's your solution for those kids? Force them to live in a bubble?
The solution is simple. Charge any parents or guardians who refuse vaccinations for their children without a medical reason with child abuse. Seize the children. Vaccinate the children.
How is it you have the brains to learn to read and write, but in other respects appear to be an ignorant halfwit?
Individual liberty doesn't give you the right to do things that directly endanger those around you. The old maxim "you're right to swing your fist ends at my nose" applies here. These fucking morons are endangering a wider population; compromising herd immunity which means that minority, who for a variety of medical reasons, cannot have the vaccine, are now at much higher risk of illness.
Frankly, I think anyone who, without permission of a doctor, who doesn't get their kids vaccinated should be charged with child abuse. We don't let Jehovah's Witnesses deprive their children of life saving blood transfusions, so why would we allow some antivaxxer nut compromise their childrens' safety?
The problem was no one had the balls to haul him into court, and then into jail. They allowed him to walk away from it; discredited yes, but unpunished in any substantive way, probably because of the culpability of some of his peers in allowing their names to show up on his fake study.
Fuck it. Just ban their kids from attending public schools, daycares and the like. If they want to endanger their kids, they should not be permitted to endanger anyone else's.
If I don't personally assemble the bits on punchcards by hand, I don't trust anything! I figure I should have my trusted JVM ready to go in about forty years...
No one said Microsoft actually knew how to gain market share. The old tools of threatening OEMs with a fate worse than death don't work any more, so Redmond is a bit of a fish out of water.